195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29726489)
1. Normative best-corrected values of the visual image quality metric VSX as a function of age and pupil size.
Hastings GD; Marsack JD; Thibos LN; Applegate RA
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2018 May; 35(5):732-739. PubMed ID: 29726489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combining optical and neural components in physiological visual image quality metrics as functions of luminance and age.
Hastings GD; Marsack JD; Thibos LN; Applegate RA
J Vis; 2020 Jul; 20(7):20. PubMed ID: 32692825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction?
Hastings GD; Marsack JD; Nguyen LC; Cheng H; Applegate RA
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):317-325. PubMed ID: 28370389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical applications of personalising the neural components of visual image quality metrics for individual eyes.
Hastings GD; Applegate RA; Schill AW; Hu C; Coates DR; Marsack JD
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Mar; 42(2):272-282. PubMed ID: 34981848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Pupil Size on Wavefront Refraction during Orthokeratology.
Faria-Ribeiro M; Navarro R; González-Méijome JM
Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Nov; 93(11):1399-1408. PubMed ID: 27668637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of optical quality metrics to predict subjective quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Bühren J; Pesudovs K; Martin T; Strenger A; Yoon G; Kohnen T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):846-55. PubMed ID: 19393883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Change in visual acuity is highly correlated with change in six image quality metrics independent of wavefront error and/or pupil diameter.
Ravikumar A; Sarver EJ; Applegate RA
J Vis; 2012 Sep; 12(10):11. PubMed ID: 22984224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicted accommodative response from image quality in young eyes fitted with different dual-focus designs.
Faria-Ribeiro M; Amorim-de-Sousa A; González-Méijome JM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 May; 38(3):309-316. PubMed ID: 29383756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of pupil diameter on the relation between ocular higher-order aberration and contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Oshika T; Tokunaga T; Samejima T; Miyata K; Kawana K; Kaji Y
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Apr; 47(4):1334-8. PubMed ID: 16565365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dioptric differences between clinically determined and metric-optimised refractions for adults with Down syndrome.
Plaumann MD; Marsack JD; Benoit JS; Manny RE; Anderson HA
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Sep; 43(5):1016-1028. PubMed ID: 37208971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-dimensional simulation of eccentric photorefraction images for ametropes: factors influencing the measurement.
Wu Y; Thibos LN; Candy TR
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Jul; 38(4):432-446. PubMed ID: 29736941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topography.
Chalita MR; Chavala S; Xu M; Krueger RR
Ophthalmology; 2004 Mar; 111(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 15019317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contribution of optical zone decentration and pupil dilation on the change of optical quality after myopic photorefractive keratectomy in a cat model.
Bühren J; Yoon G; MacRae S; Huxlin K
J Refract Surg; 2010 Mar; 26(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 20229950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wave aberration of human eyes and new descriptors of image optical quality and visual performance.
Lombardo M; Lombardo G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 36(2):313-31. PubMed ID: 20152616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of age, decentration, aberrations and pupil size on subjective image quality with concentric bifocal optics.
Rio D; Woog K; Legras R
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jul; 36(4):411-20. PubMed ID: 27196105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance.
Marsack JD; Thibos LN; Applegate RA
J Vis; 2004 Apr; 4(4):322-8. PubMed ID: 15134479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uncorrected wavefront error and visual performance during RGP wear in keratoconus.
Marsack JD; Parker KE; Pesudovs K; Donnelly WJ; Applegate RA
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jun; 84(6):463-70. PubMed ID: 17568315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling refractive correction strategies in keratoconus.
Rozema JJ; Hastings GD; Marsack J; Koppen C; Applegate RA
J Vis; 2021 Sep; 21(10):18. PubMed ID: 34554182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optical quality of rotationally symmetrical contact lenses derived from their power profiles.
Del Águila-Carrasco AJ; Monsálvez-Romín D; Papadatou E
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):346-350. PubMed ID: 28522252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual Acuity Prediction Based on Different Refraction Types For Patients With Down Syndrome.
Schneider LV; Mitchell GL; Marsack JD; Anderson HA
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2023 Sep; 12(9):11. PubMed ID: 37725391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
