969 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29726616)
1. Long-term outcomes of patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Abdelaziz HK; Saad M; Abuomara HZ; Nairooz R; Pothineni NVK; Madmani ME; Roberts DH; Mahmud E
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):176-186. PubMed ID: 29726616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure versus medical therapy for prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with prior cryptogenic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Akobeng AK; Abdelgadir I; Boudjemline Y; Hijazi ZM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):165-173. PubMed ID: 29602258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: To Close or Not to Close? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Lattanzi S; Brigo F; Cagnetti C; Di Napoli M; Silvestrini M
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2018; 45(5-6):193-203. PubMed ID: 29649819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke - An Updated Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.
Sitwala P; Khalid MF; Khattak F; Bagai J; Bhogal S; Ladia V; Mukherjee D; Daggubati R; Paul TK
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Aug; 20(8):687-694. PubMed ID: 30282597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors of recurrent events in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale within the CLOSURE I (Evaluation of the STARFlex Septal Closure System in Patients With a Stroke and/or Transient Ischemic Attack Due to Presumed Paradoxical Embolism Through a Patent Foramen Ovale) trial.
Elmariah S; Furlan AJ; Reisman M; Burke D; Vardi M; Wimmer NJ; Ling S; Chen X; Kent DM; Massaro J; Mauri L;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(8):913-20. PubMed ID: 25147037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale versus Medical Therapy after Cryptogenic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Darmoch F; Al-Khadra Y; Soud M; Fanari Z; Alraies MC
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2018; 45(3-4):162-169. PubMed ID: 29597192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Case for Selective Patent Foramen Ovale Closure After Cryptogenic Stroke.
Wiktor DM; Carroll JD
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 11(3):e004152. PubMed ID: 29870380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Closure versus medical therapy for preventing recurrent stroke in patients with patent foramen ovale and a history of cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack.
Li J; Liu J; Liu M; Zhang S; Hao Z; Zhang J; Zhang C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; 2015(9):CD009938. PubMed ID: 26346232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term follow-up after PFO device closure: Outcomes and Complications in a Single-center Experience.
Taggart NW; Reeder GS; Lennon RJ; Slusser JP; Freund MA; Cabalka AK; Cetta F; Hagler DJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jan; 89(1):124-133. PubMed ID: 27027873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Closure of patent foramen ovale or medical therapy alone for secondary prevention of cryptogenic cerebrovascular events.
Fortuni F; Crimi G; Leonardi S; Angelini F; Raisaro A; Lanzarini LF; Oltrona Visconti L; Ferrario M; De Ferrari GM
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2018 Jul; 19(7):373-381. PubMed ID: 29708911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Device closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy in cryptogenic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Khan AR; Bin Abdulhak AA; Sheikh MA; Khan S; Erwin PJ; Tleyjeh I; Khuder S; Eltahawy EA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Dec; 6(12):1316-23. PubMed ID: 24139929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Percutaneous closure versus medical therapy for stroke with patent foramen Ovale: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang XL; Kang LN; Wang L; Xu B
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2018 Mar; 18(1):45. PubMed ID: 29499641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Versus Medical Therapy in Cryptogenic Strokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
Vidale S; Russo F; Campana C; Agostoni E
Angiology; 2019 Apr; 70(4):325-331. PubMed ID: 30270651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patent foramen ovale transcatheter closure vs. medical therapy on recurrent vascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Rengifo-Moreno P; Palacios IF; Junpaparp P; Witzke CF; Morris DL; Romero-Corral A
Eur Heart J; 2013 Nov; 34(43):3342-52. PubMed ID: 23847132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Versus Medical Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials.
Wang TKM; Wang MTM; Ruygrok P
Heart Lung Circ; 2019 Apr; 28(4):623-631. PubMed ID: 29602754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale for secondary prevention of ischemic stroke: Quantitative synthesis of pooled randomized trial data.
Hakeem A; Cilingiroglu M; Katramados A; Boudoulas KD; Iliescu C; Gundogdu B; Marmagkiolis K
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Nov; 92(6):1153-1160. PubMed ID: 29332308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percutaneous closure versus medical therapy alone for cryptogenic stroke patients with a patent foramen ovale: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Pickett CA; Villines TC; Ferguson MA; Hulten EA
Tex Heart Inst J; 2014 Aug; 41(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 25120387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Propensity Score-Based Analysis of Percutaneous Closure Versus Medical Therapy in Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale: The IPSYS Registry (Italian Project on Stroke in Young Adults).
Pezzini A; Grassi M; Lodigiani C; Patella R; Gandolfo C; Zini A; DeLodovici ML; Paciaroni M; Del Sette M; Toriello A; Musolino R; Calabrò RS; Bovi P; Adami A; Silvestrelli G; Sessa M; Cavallini A; Marcheselli S; Marco Bonifati D; Checcarelli N; Tancredi L; Chiti A; Del Zotto E; Tomelleri G; Spalloni A; Giorli E; Costa P; Giacalone G; Ferrazzi P; Poli L; Morotti A; Piras V; Rasura M; Simone AM; Gamba M; Cerrato P; Zedde ML; Micieli G; Melis M; Massucco D; Guido D; De Giuli V; Bonaiti S; D'Amore C; La Starza S; Iacoviello L; Padovani A;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 27582111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Preventing Subsequent Neurological Events: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis to Identify the Best Device.
Varotto L; Bregolin G; Paccanaro M; De Boni A; Bonanno C; Perini F
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2020; 49(2):124-134. PubMed ID: 32289794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percutaneous Closure Versus Medical Treatment in Stroke Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
De Rosa S; Sievert H; Sabatino J; Polimeni A; Sorrentino S; Indolfi C
Ann Intern Med; 2018 Mar; 168(5):343-350. PubMed ID: 29310133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
