380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29727767)
1. Bioabsorbable plating in the treatment of pediatric clavicle fractures: A biomechanical and clinical analysis.
Osborn EJ; Farnsworth CL; Doan JD; Edmonds EW
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Jun; 55():94-99. PubMed ID: 29727767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unicortical and bicortical plating in the fixation of comminuted fractures of the clavicle: a biomechanical study.
Looft JM; Corrêa L; Patel M; Rawlings M; Ackland DC
ANZ J Surg; 2017 Nov; 87(11):915-920. PubMed ID: 28922701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two reconstruction plates provide superior stability of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in comparison to single plating - A biomechanical study.
Yanev P; Zderic I; Pukalski Y; Enchev D; Rashkov M; Varga P; Gehweiler D; Richards G; Gueorguiev B; Baltov A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Dec; 80():105199. PubMed ID: 33129563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low-Profile Dual Small Plate Fixation Is Biomechanically Similar to Larger Superior or Anteroinferior Single Plate Fixation of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures.
Ziegler CG; Aman ZS; Storaci HW; Finch H; Dornan GJ; Kennedy MI; Provencher MT; Hackett TR
Am J Sports Med; 2019 Sep; 47(11):2678-2685. PubMed ID: 31381363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Unicortical versus bicortical locked plate fixation in midshaft clavicle fractures.
Bravman JT; Taylor ML; Baldini T; Vidal AF
Orthopedics; 2015 May; 38(5):e411-6. PubMed ID: 25970369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A hybrid approach to mid-shaft clavicle fixation.
Rawlings M; Knox D; Patel M; Ackland D
Injury; 2016 Apr; 47(4):893-8. PubMed ID: 26944179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of clavicle fracture plating techniques: does a locking plate provide improved stability?
Celestre P; Roberston C; Mahar A; Oka R; Meunier M; Schwartz A
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Apr; 22(4):241-7. PubMed ID: 18404033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are clinical outcomes affected by type of plate used for management of mid-shaft clavicle fractures?
Alzahrani MM; Cota A; Alkhelaifi K; Aleidan A; Berry G; Reindl R; Harvey E
J Orthop Traumatol; 2018 Aug; 19(1):8. PubMed ID: 30112628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of the Locking Compression superior anterior clavicle plate with seven and ten hole reconstruction plates in midshaft clavicle fracture stabilisation.
Eden L; Doht S; Frey SP; Ziegler D; Stoyhe J; Fehske K; Blunk T; Meffert RH
Int Orthop; 2012 Dec; 36(12):2537-43. PubMed ID: 23073924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Numerical simulation and biomechanical analysis of locking screw caps on clavicle locking plates.
Kim DG; Min Kim S; Kim Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Jul; 101(30):e29319. PubMed ID: 35905263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A biomechanical comparison of superior and anterior positioning of precontoured plates for midshaft clavicle fractures.
Toogood P; Coughlin D; Rodriguez D; Lotz J; Feeley B
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2014 Oct; 43(10):E226-31. PubMed ID: 25303449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual mini-fragment plating for midshaft clavicle fractures: a clinical and biomechanical investigation.
Prasarn ML; Meyers KN; Wilkin G; Wellman DS; Chan DB; Ahn J; Lorich DG; Helfet DL
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Dec; 135(12):1655-62. PubMed ID: 26377733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single versus dual orthogonal plating for comminuted midshaft clavicle fractures: a biomechanics study.
Boyce GN; Philpott AJ; Ackland DC; Ek ET
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jul; 15(1):248. PubMed ID: 32646450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical analysis of locked and non-locked plate fixation of the clavicle.
Little KJ; Riches PE; Fazzi UG
Injury; 2012 Jun; 43(6):921-5. PubMed ID: 22405337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures: A systematic review of biomechanical studies.
Hulsmans MH; van Heijl M; Houwert RM; Burger BJ; Verleisdonk EJM; Veeger DJ; van der Meijden OA
Injury; 2018 Apr; 49(4):753-765. PubMed ID: 29523350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of contemporary clavicle fixation devices.
Renfree T; Conrad B; Wright T
J Hand Surg Am; 2010 Apr; 35(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 20138445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical analysis of bicortical versus unicortical locked plating of mid-clavicular fractures.
Hamman D; Lindsey D; Dragoo J
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Jun; 131(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 21069362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New generation of superior single plating vs. low-profile dual minifragment plating in diaphyseal clavicle fractures: a biomechanical comparative study.
Pastor T; Zderic I; Berk T; Souleiman F; Vögelin E; Beeres FJP; Gueorguiev B; Pastor T
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Feb; 33(2):409-416. PubMed ID: 37748530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation.
Wang SH; Lin HJ; Shen HC; Pan RY; Yang JJ
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Apr; 20(1):178. PubMed ID: 31027505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical Comparison of Bicortical, Unicortical, and Unicortical Far-Cortex-Abutting Screw Fixations in Plated Comminuted Midshaft Clavicle Fractures.
Croley JS; Morris RP; Amin A; Lindsey RW; Gugala Z
J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jun; 41(6):703-11. PubMed ID: 27113909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
