These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29727813)

  • 41. MaSTR™: an effective probabilistic genotyping tool for interpretation of STR mixtures associated with differentially degraded DNA.
    Holland MM; Tiedge TM; Bender AJ; Gaston-Sanchez SA; McElhoe JA
    Int J Legal Med; 2022 Mar; 136(2):433-446. PubMed ID: 35092470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Application of random match probability calculations to mixed STR profiles.
    Bille T; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):474-85. PubMed ID: 23425220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Validating TrueAllele
    Bauer DW; Butt N; Hornyak JM; Perlin MW
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):380-398. PubMed ID: 31580496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A Review of Probabilistic Genotyping Systems:
    Gill P; Benschop C; Buckleton J; Bleka Ø; Taylor D
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 34680954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) Internal validation of STRmix™ - a multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11-24.
    McNevin D; Wright K; Chaseling J; Barash M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():e14-e17. PubMed ID: 30948259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluating forensic DNA profiles using peak heights, allowing for multiple donors, allelic dropout and stutters.
    Puch-Solis R; Rodgers L; Mazumder A; Pope S; Evett I; Curran J; Balding D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):555-63. PubMed ID: 23948327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Response to: Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) Internal validation of STRmix™ - A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11-24.
    Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Ciecko A; Kruijver M; Mallinder B; Magee A; Malsom S; Moretti T; Weitz S; Bille T; Noël S; Oefelein RH; Peck B; Kalafut T; Taylor DA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102198. PubMed ID: 31710898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts.
    Bleka Ø; Storvik G; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():35-44. PubMed ID: 26720812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Exploring likelihood ratios assigned for siblings of the true mixture contributor as an alternate contributor.
    Kelly H; Coble M; Kruijver M; Wivell R; Bright JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1167-1175. PubMed ID: 35211970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Investigating a common approach to DNA profile interpretation using probabilistic software.
    Cooper S; McGovern C; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():121-131. PubMed ID: 25596557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics.
    Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 19647706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Facilitating complex DNA mixture interpretation by sequencing highly polymorphic haplotypes.
    Voskoboinik L; Motro U; Darvasi A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():136-140. PubMed ID: 29775859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model.
    Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. ProbRank: An efficient DNA database search method for complex mixtures per a quantitative likelihood ratio model.
    Hoogenboom J; Sijen T; Benschop C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102884. PubMed ID: 37150077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A large-scale validation of NOCIt's a posteriori probability of the number of contributors and its integration into forensic interpretation pipelines.
    Grgicak CM; Karkar S; Yearwood-Garcia X; Alfonse LE; Duffy KR; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102296. PubMed ID: 32339916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A series of recommended tests when validating probabilistic DNA profile interpretation software.
    Bright JA; Evett IW; Taylor D; Curran JM; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jan; 14():125-31. PubMed ID: 25450783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Combining artificial neural network classification with fully continuous probabilistic genotyping to remove the need for an analytical threshold and electropherogram reading.
    Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jan; 62():102787. PubMed ID: 36270165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A tool for simulating single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Kruijver M; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Sep; 60():102746. PubMed ID: 35843122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.