These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2972805)

  • 1. Evidence for auditory temporal distinctiveness: modality effects in order and frequency judgments.
    Glenberg AM; Fernandez A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Oct; 14(4):728-39. PubMed ID: 2972805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modality effects in delayed free recall and recognition: visual is better than auditory.
    Penney CG
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1989 Aug; 41(3):455-70. PubMed ID: 2798920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immediate serial recall of mixed-modality lists.
    Greene RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):266-74. PubMed ID: 2522515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distinctiveness revisited: unpredictable temporal isolation does not benefit short-term serial recall of heard or seen events.
    Nimmo LM; Lewandowsky S
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1368-75. PubMed ID: 17225515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repetition blindness: the effects of stimulus modality and spatial displacement.
    Kanwisher N; Potter MC
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 2927309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Serial recall of two-voice lists: implications for theories of auditory recency and suffix effects.
    Greene RL
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jan; 19(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 2017031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of auditory features in memory span for words.
    Drewnowski A; Murdock BB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 May; 6(3):319-32. PubMed ID: 7373250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is the word length effect in STM entirely attributable to output delay? Evidence from serial recognition.
    Baddeley A; Chincotta D; Stafford L; Turk D
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):353-69. PubMed ID: 12047049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct versus indirect tests of memory for source: judgments of modality.
    Kelley CM; Jacoby LL; Hollingshead A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Nov; 15(6):1101-8. PubMed ID: 2530308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The modality effect and echoic persistence.
    Watkins OC; Watkins MJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Sep; 109(3):251-78. PubMed ID: 6447188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A dissociation in the effects of study modality on tests of implicit and explicit memory.
    Hayman CA; Rickards C
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jan; 23(1):95-112. PubMed ID: 7885269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influences of delayed distraction on the modality effect in free recall.
    Gathercole SE; Gregg VH; Gardiner JM
    Br J Psychol; 1983 May; 74(Pt 2):223-32. PubMed ID: 6883013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is there a modality effect? Evidence for visual recency and suffix effects.
    Battacchi MW; Pelamatti GM; Umiltà C
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):651-8. PubMed ID: 2266866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition.
    Connine CM; Mullennix J; Shernoff E; Yelen J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Nov; 16(6):1084-96. PubMed ID: 2148581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rehearsal of visual and auditory stimuli while shadowing.
    Kroll NE; Kellicut MH; Parks TE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 Mar; 104(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 1141832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of sensory modality for presentation and word imagery on paired-associate learning.
    Papineau W; Lohr JM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Jun; 52(3):747-50. PubMed ID: 7267250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inverting the modality effect in serial recall.
    Beaman CP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):371-89. PubMed ID: 12047050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of recoding and presentation format on recency and suffix effects.
    Manning SK; Koehler L; Hampton S
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Mar; 18(2):164-73. PubMed ID: 2319958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enumeration produces poor primacy for tactile presentation relative to visual and auditory presentation as the only modality effect.
    Gibbons JA; Velkey AJ; Partin KT
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Jun; 106(3):795-810. PubMed ID: 18712201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A retrieval account of the long-term modality effect.
    Glenberg AM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Jan; 10(1):16-31. PubMed ID: 6242733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.