These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29728189)
21. Normative data on nasalance scores for Farsi speaking children: Influence of age, gender and phonetic context. Saber-Moghadam R; Faham M; Ghavami FS; Ghayoumi-Anaraki Z Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Dec; 127():109680. PubMed ID: 31536853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Influence of glottal stops on nasalance and velopharyngeal closure status after cleft palate surgery]. Gao T; Ma L; Luo Y; Sun YG Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Dec; 55(12):958-962. PubMed ID: 33280360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores. Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 22938066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer, the NasalView, and the OroNasal System. Bressmann T Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Jul; 42(4):423-33. PubMed ID: 16001925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Nasalance scores for normal Korean-speaking adults and children. Park M; Baek WS; Lee E; Koh KS; Kim BK; Baek R J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Feb; 67(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 24211114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of cleft type on overall speech intelligibility and resonance. Van Lierde KM; De Bodt M; Van Borsel J; Wuyts FL; Van Cauwenberge P Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2002; 54(3):158-68. PubMed ID: 12077507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The relationship between nasalance and nasality in children with cleft palate. Watterson T; McFarlane SC; Wright DS J Commun Disord; 1993 Apr; 26(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 8340487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Relationship between perceptual ratings of nasality and nasometry in children/adolescents with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction. Sweeney T; Sell D Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(3):265-82. PubMed ID: 17852526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dialectal and gender differences in nasalance for a Mandarin population. Kim HK; Yu XM; Cao YJ; Liu XM; Huang ZM Clin Linguist Phon; 2016; 30(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 26853731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Same noses, different nasalance scores: data from normal subjects and cleft palate speakers for three systems for nasalance analysis. Bressmann T; Klaiman P; Fischbach S Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):163-70. PubMed ID: 16428233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Normative nasalance scores in the production of words and syllables for Brazilian Portuguese speakers. Sampaio-Teixeira ACM; Oliveira DN; Yamashita RP; Fukushiro AP; Trindade IEK Clin Linguist Phon; 2019; 33(12):1139-1148. PubMed ID: 30894033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained from the Nasometer and the NasalView. Lewis KE; Watterson T Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Jan; 40(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 12498604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Investigating the Effects of Glottal Stop Productions on Voice in Children With Cleft Palate Using Multidimensional Voice Assessment Methods. Aydınlı FE; Özcebe E; Kulak Kayıkçı ME; Yılmaz T; Özgür FF J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e9-763.e15. PubMed ID: 26739858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of pharyngeal flap surgery on nasality and nasalance scores of nasal sounds production in individuals with cleft lip and palate. Fukushiro AP; Ferlin F; Yamashita RP; Trindade IE Codas; 2015; 27(6):584-7. PubMed ID: 26691623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Nasalance Scores for Normal Speakers of American English Obtained by the Nasometer II Using the MacKay-Kummer SNAP-R Test. Alfwaress F; Kummer AW; Weinrich B Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2022 Jun; 59(6):765-773. PubMed ID: 34184583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Perceptual-Speech, Nasometric, and Cephalometric Results After Modified V-Y Palatoplasties With or Without Mucosal Graft. Oyama K; Nishihara K; Matsunaga K; Miura N; Kibe T; Nakamura N Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 Jul; 53(4):469-80. PubMed ID: 26606277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of different calibration schedules on the test-retest differences of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer 6450. Hahm J; Bressmann T Clin Linguist Phon; 2022 Mar; 36(2-3):292-300. PubMed ID: 34554041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Nasometric values for normal nasal resonance in the speech of young Flemish adults. Van Lierde KM; Wuyts FL; De Bodt M; Van Cauwenberge P Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Mar; 38(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 11294538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]