498 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29728249)
1. False-positive reduction in computer-aided mass detection using mammographic texture analysis and classification.
Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Kurek J; Swiderski B; Kruk M; Zagrouba E
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 160():75-83. PubMed ID: 29728249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multi-scale textural feature extraction and particle swarm optimization based model selection for false positive reduction in mammography.
Zyout I; Czajkowska J; Grzegorzek M
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():95-107. PubMed ID: 25795630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography.
Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Wei J; Cha K
Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6654. PubMed ID: 27908154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incorporation of an iterative, linear segmentation routine into a mammographic mass CAD system.
Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 15259655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-aided mass detection in mammography: false positive reduction via gray-scale invariant ranklet texture features.
Masotti M; Lanconelli N; Campanini R
Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 19291970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiresolution local binary pattern texture analysis combined with variable selection for application to false-positive reduction in computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms.
Choi JY; Ro YM
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):7029-52. PubMed ID: 23053352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms: global and local multiresolution texture analysis.
Wei D; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):903-14. PubMed ID: 9198026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Efficient Approach for Automated Mass Segmentation and Classification in Mammograms.
Dong M; Lu X; Ma Y; Guo Y; Ma Y; Wang K
J Digit Imaging; 2015 Oct; 28(5):613-25. PubMed ID: 25776767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses using visually sensitive image features.
Wang Y; Aghaei F; Zarafshani A; Qiu Y; Qian W; Zheng B
J Xray Sci Technol; 2017; 25(1):171-186. PubMed ID: 27911353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mass type-specific sparse representation for mass classification in computer-aided detection on mammograms.
Kim DH; Lee SH; Ro YM
Biomed Eng Online; 2013; 12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. PubMed ID: 24564973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Decision support system for breast cancer detection using mammograms.
Ganesan K; Acharya RU; Chua CK; Min LC; Mathew B; Thomas AK
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):721-32. PubMed ID: 23636749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applying a new quantitative image analysis scheme based on global mammographic features to assist diagnosis of breast cancer.
Chen X; Zargari A; Hollingsworth AB; Liu H; Zheng B; Qiu Y
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Oct; 179():104995. PubMed ID: 31443864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new and fast image feature selection method for developing an optimal mammographic mass detection scheme.
Tan M; Pu J; Zheng B
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081906. PubMed ID: 25086537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Local Binary Patterns Descriptor Based on Sparse Curvelet Coefficients for False-Positive Reduction in Mammograms.
Pawar MM; Talbar SN; Dudhane A
J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():5940436. PubMed ID: 30356422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided diagnosis in mammography: classification of mass and normal tissue by texture analysis.
Petrosian A; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Dec; 39(12):2273-88. PubMed ID: 15551553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms.
Sapate SG; Mahajan A; Talbar SN; Sable N; Desai S; Thakur M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():1-20. PubMed ID: 30119844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer aided detection of masses in mammography using subregion Hotelling observers.
Baydush AH; Catarious DM; Abbey CK; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1781-7. PubMed ID: 12906196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of mammographic masses based on level set segmentation with new image features and patient information.
Shi J; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Nees A; Wu YT; Wei J; Zhou C; Zhang Y; Cui J
Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):280-90. PubMed ID: 18293583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
