These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29728918)

  • 1. The Sufficient and Necessary Condition for the Identifiability and Estimability of the DINA Model.
    Gu Y; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):468-483. PubMed ID: 29728918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sufficient and Necessary Conditions for the Identifiability of DINA Models with Polytomous Responses.
    Lin M; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):717-740. PubMed ID: 38517594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generic Identifiability of the DINA Model and Blessing of Latent Dependence.
    Gu Y
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):117-131. PubMed ID: 36167947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifiability of Latent Class Models with Covariates.
    Ouyang J; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2022 Dec; 87(4):1343-1360. PubMed ID: 35254608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models.
    Xu G; Zhang S
    Psychometrika; 2016 Sep; 81(3):625-49. PubMed ID: 26155755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.
    Chen Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y; Douglas J
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 28861685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Note on Weaker Conditions for Identifying Restricted Latent Class Models for Binary Responses.
    Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):158-174. PubMed ID: 35896935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifiability of Hidden Markov Models for Learning Trajectories in Cognitive Diagnosis.
    Liu Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y
    Psychometrika; 2023 Jun; 88(2):361-386. PubMed ID: 36797538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the Consistency of Q-Matrix Estimation: A Rejoinder.
    de la Torre J; Chiu CY
    Psychometrika; 2017 Jun; 82(2):528-529. PubMed ID: 27339703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the Link between Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Knowledge Space Theory.
    Heller J; Stefanutti L; Anselmi P; Robusto E
    Psychometrika; 2015 Dec; 80(4):995-1019. PubMed ID: 25838246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Sparse Latent Class Model for Cognitive Diagnosis.
    Chen Y; Culpepper S; Liang F
    Psychometrika; 2020 Mar; 85(1):121-153. PubMed ID: 31927684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Empirical Q-Matrix Validation Method for the Polytomous G-DINA Model.
    de la Torre J; Qiu XL; Santos KC
    Psychometrika; 2022 Jun; 87(2):693-724. PubMed ID: 34843060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A classification model for continuous responses: Identifying risk perception groups on health-related activities.
    de Oliveira ESB; Wang X; Bazán JL
    Biom J; 2023 Apr; 65(4):e2100222. PubMed ID: 36782079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A General Method of Empirical Q-matrix Validation.
    de la Torre J; Chiu CY
    Psychometrika; 2016 Jun; 81(2):253-73. PubMed ID: 25943366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New Paradigm of Identifiable General-response Cognitive Diagnostic Models: Beyond Categorical Data.
    Lee S; Gu Y
    Psychometrika; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38967857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating CDMs Using the Slice-Within-Gibbs Sampler.
    Xu X; de la Torre J; Zhang J; Guo J; Shi N
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2260. PubMed ID: 33101108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Procedure for Assessing the Completeness of the Q-Matrices of Cognitively Diagnostic Tests.
    Köhn HF; Chiu CY
    Psychometrika; 2017 Mar; 82(1):112-132. PubMed ID: 27714544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Going Deep in Diagnostic Modeling: Deep Cognitive Diagnostic Models (DeepCDMs).
    Gu Y
    Psychometrika; 2024 Mar; 89(1):118-150. PubMed ID: 38079062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating the DINA model parameters using the No-U-Turn Sampler.
    da Silva MA; de Oliveira ESB; von Davier AA; Bazán JL
    Biom J; 2018 Mar; 60(2):352-368. PubMed ID: 29194715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Restricted Four-Parameter IRT Model: The Dyad Four-Parameter Normal Ogive (Dyad-4PNO) Model.
    Kern JL; Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2020 Sep; 85(3):575-599. PubMed ID: 32803390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.