These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29728933)

  • 1. Effect of Topical Steroids on Skin Prick Test: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Ebbesen AR; Riis LA; Gradman J
    Dermatol Ther (Heidelb); 2018 Jun; 8(2):285-290. PubMed ID: 29728933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of distance between sites and region of the body on results of skin prick tests.
    Nelson HS; Knoetzer J; Bucher B
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1996 Feb; 97(2):596-601. PubMed ID: 8621844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of montelukast on wheal reactions in skin prick tests: a double-blind-placebo-controlled randomized trial.
    Bulan K; Aydogan M; Siraneci R; Aydogmus CY
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 77(10):1655-8. PubMed ID: 23958393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative skin prick testing. Dose-response of histamine- and allergen-induced wheal reactions.
    Malling HJ
    Allergy; 1987 Apr; 42(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 3592144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impaired resolution of wheals in the skin prick test and low diamine oxidase blood level in allergic patients.
    Wagner A; Buczyłko K; Zielińska-Bliźniewska H; Wagner W
    Postepy Dermatol Alergol; 2019 Oct; 36(5):538-543. PubMed ID: 31839770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of skin prick location on the forearm using a novel skin prick automated test device.
    Seys SF; Gorris S; Uyttebroek S; Backaert W; Jorissen M; Schrijvers R; Daems R; Loeckx D; Van Gerven L; Hellings PW
    Front Allergy; 2023; 4():1289031. PubMed ID: 38026131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Skin reactivity to histamine and to allergens in unselected 9-year-old children living in Poland and Italy.
    Ronchetti R; Haluszka J; Martella S; Falasca C; Guglielmi F; Parmiani S; Zakrzewski J; Bednarek AL; Barreto M; Villa MP
    Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2003 Jun; 14(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 12787299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpreting skin prick tests in the evaluation of food allergy in children.
    Eigenmann PA; Sampson HA
    Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 1998 Nov; 9(4):186-91. PubMed ID: 9920216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The comparison of reactions in skin prick test performed with the standardized lancet and the injection needle].
    Semik-Orzech A; Barczyk A; Pierzchała W
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Jun; 24(144):495-501. PubMed ID: 18702329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement and interpretation of skin prick test results.
    van der Valk JP; Gerth van Wijk R; Hoorn E; Groenendijk L; Groenendijk IM; de Jong NW
    Clin Transl Allergy; 2015; 6():8. PubMed ID: 26909142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diurnal Variations in Skin Prick Testing.
    Ochfeld E; Cheng B; Bowsher N; Fishbein A
    Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol; 2021 Dec; 34(4):125-129. PubMed ID: 34714138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnosis and immunotherapy of mould allergy. II. Reproducibility and relationship between skin sensitivity estimated by end-point titration and histamine equivalent reaction using skin prick test and intradermal test.
    Malling HJ
    Allergy; 1985 Jul; 40(5):354-62. PubMed ID: 4041142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The shape of and applied weight on skin prick lancets critically affect the wheal size in the skin prick test.
    Bartko EA; Elberling J; Mosbech H
    World Allergy Organ J; 2024 Jun; 17(6):100915. PubMed ID: 38974945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Skin reactivity in the histamine-equivalent skin test in hypersensitivity to grass pollen].
    Paranos S; Petrović S; Bojović I
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2000; 128(5-6):194-9. PubMed ID: 11089421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of reservoir effect of clobetasol propionate cream in an experimental animal model using histamine-induced wheal suppression test.
    Abidi A; Ahmad F; Singh SK; Kumar A
    Indian J Dermatol; 2010 Oct; 55(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 21430883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of skin prick test criteria on estimation of prevalence and incidence of allergic sensitization in children.
    Meinert R; Frischer T; Karmaus W; Kuehr J
    Allergy; 1994 Aug; 49(7):526-32. PubMed ID: 7825719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of montelukast (10mg daily) and loratadine (10mg daily) on wheal, flare and itching reactions in skin prick tests.
    Kupczyk M; Kupryś I; Górski P; Kuna P
    Pulm Pharmacol Ther; 2007; 20(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 16516511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Topical dermal anaesthesia inhibits the flare but not the weal response to allergen and histamine in the skin-prick test.
    Pipkorn U; Andersson M
    Clin Allergy; 1987 Jul; 17(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 3621549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skin test reactivity in infancy.
    Ménardo JL; Bousquet J; Rodière M; Astruc J; Michel FB
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1985 Jun; 75(6):646-51. PubMed ID: 2409121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Half an hour versus three hour contact of topical steroid (clobetasol propionate).
    Rai R; Uppal M; Sharma NK; Srinivas CR; Mathew A
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2004; 70(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 17642617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.