These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29729022)
1. Reassessment of stopping power ratio uncertainties caused by mean excitation energies using a water-based formalism. De Smet V; Labarbe R; Vander Stappen F; Macq B; Sterpin E Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3361-3370. PubMed ID: 29729022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to patient stopping-power-ratio estimation using the stoichiometric calibration. Yang M; Zhu XR; Park PC; Titt U; Mohan R; Virshup G; Clayton JE; Dong L Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 57(13):4095-115. PubMed ID: 22678123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimized I-values for use with the Bragg additivity rule and their impact on proton stopping power and range uncertainty. Bär E; Andreo P; Lalonde A; Royle G; Bouchard H Phys Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 63(16):165007. PubMed ID: 29999493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Towards subpercentage uncertainty proton stopping-power mapping via dual-energy CT: Direct experimental validation and uncertainty analysis of a statistical iterative image reconstruction method. Medrano M; Liu R; Zhao T; Webb T; Politte DG; Whiting BR; Liao R; Ge T; Porras-Chaverri MA; O'Sullivan JA; Williamson JF Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1599-1618. PubMed ID: 35029302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A robust empirical parametrization of proton stopping power using dual energy CT. Taasti VT; Petersen JB; Muren LP; Thygesen J; Hansen DC Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5547. PubMed ID: 27782721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Revisiting the single-energy CT calibration for proton therapy treatment planning: a critical look at the stoichiometric method. Gomà C; Almeida IP; Verhaegen F Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235011. PubMed ID: 30474618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of an MR-based multimodal method for molecular composition and proton stopping power ratio determination using Marants R; Tattenberg S; Scholey J; Kaza E; Miao X; Benkert T; Magneson O; Fischer J; Vinas L; Niepel K; Bortfeld T; Landry G; Parodi K; Verburg J; Sudhyadhom A Phys Med Biol; 2023 Aug; 68(17):. PubMed ID: 37463589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose to 'water-like' media or dose to tissue in MV photons radiotherapy treatment planning: still a matter of debate. Andreo P Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):309-37. PubMed ID: 25503312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic analysis of the impact of imaging noise on dual-energy CT-based proton stopping power ratio estimation. Lee HHC; Li B; Duan X; Zhou L; Jia X; Yang M Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2251-2263. PubMed ID: 30883827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimal energy selection for proton stopping-power-ratio estimation using dual-energy CT-based monoenergetic imaging. Je E; Lee HH; Duan X; Li B; Jia X; Yang M Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(19):195015. PubMed ID: 31437824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of using megavoltage computed tomography to reduce proton range uncertainty: A simulation study. Hu Y; Ding X; Shen J; Bues M; Liu W; Kang Y; Leng S; Yu L J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):131-140. PubMed ID: 33608992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Technical Note: On the calculation of stopping-power ratio for stoichiometric calibration in proton therapy. Ödén J; Zimmerman J; Bujila R; Nowik P; Poludniowski G Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5252-7. PubMed ID: 26328974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Material assignment for proton range prediction in Monte Carlo patient simulations using stopping-power datasets. Permatasari FF; Eulitz J; Richter C; Wohlfahrt P; Lühr A Phys Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 65(18):185004. PubMed ID: 32460261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of joint statistical dual-energy CT reconstruction of proton stopping power images: Comparison to image- and sinogram-domain material decomposition approaches. Zhang S; Han D; Politte DG; Williamson JF; O'Sullivan JA Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2129-2142. PubMed ID: 29570809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to stopping-power-ratio estimation using dual-energy CT imaging. Li B; Lee HC; Duan X; Shen C; Zhou L; Jia X; Yang M Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(17):7056-7074. PubMed ID: 28678019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A stoichiometric calibration method for dual energy computed tomography. Bourque AE; Carrier JF; Bouchard H Phys Med Biol; 2014 Apr; 59(8):2059-88. PubMed ID: 24694786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A linear, separable two-parameter model for dual energy CT imaging of proton stopping power computation. Han D; Siebers JV; Williamson JF Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):600. PubMed ID: 26745952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography to Assess Intra- and Inter-Patient Tissue Variability for Proton Treatment Planning of Patients With Brain Tumor. Wohlfahrt P; Möhler C; Troost EGC; Greilich S; Richter C Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Nov; 105(3):504-513. PubMed ID: 31271828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pre-clinical evaluation of dual-layer spectral computed tomography-based stopping power prediction for particle therapy planning at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center. Faller FK; Mein S; Ackermann B; Debus J; Stiller W; Mairani A Phys Med Biol; 2020 Apr; 65(9):095007. PubMed ID: 32028273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Bayesian approach to solve proton stopping powers from noisy multi-energy CT data. Lalonde A; Bär E; Bouchard H Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5293-5302. PubMed ID: 28752662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]