913 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29729035)
1. Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database.
Obinata D; Sugihara T; Yasunaga H; Mochida J; Yamaguchi K; Murata Y; Yoshizawa T; Matsui T; Matsui H; Sasabuchi Y; Fujimura T; Homma Y; Takahashi S
Int J Urol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):655-659. PubMed ID: 29729035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
Baines G; Price N; Jefferis H; Cartwright R; Jackson SR
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 31041499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost analysis of surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse by laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or transvaginal mesh.
Carracedo D; López-Fando L; Sánchez MD; Jiménez MÁ; Gómez JM; Laso I; Rodríguez MÁ; Burgos FJ
Actas Urol Esp; 2017 Mar; 41(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 27614392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Analysis of a National Multi-institutional Dataset.
Kisby CK; Occhino JA; Bews KA; Habermann EB; Linder BJ
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):72-77. PubMed ID: 31094716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What to Do With Recurrent Prolapse After Vaginal Mesh Failure?
Norinho de Oliveira P; Bourdel N; Rabischong B; Canis M; Botchorishvili R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 26408228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of abdominal sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, and laparoscopic pectopexy for apical prolapse.
Biler A; Ertas IE; Tosun G; Hortu I; Turkay U; Gultekin OE; Igci G
Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(5):996-1004. PubMed ID: 30044591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with mesh for severe pelvic organ prolapse.
Zhu L; Sun Z; Yu M; Li B; Li X; Lang J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 May; 121(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 23415023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
Pan K; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xu H
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: how low does the mesh go?
Wong V; Guzman Rojas R; Shek KL; Chou D; Moore KH; Dietz HP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):404-408. PubMed ID: 26877210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: with or without robotic assistance.
Chan SS; Pang SM; Cheung TH; Cheung RY; Chung TK
Hong Kong Med J; 2011 Feb; 17(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 21282827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse, a randomized controlled trial: SALTO-2 trial, study protocol.
Coolen AWM; van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden AMJ; Veen J; van Eijndhoven HWF; Mol BWJ; Roovers JP; Bongers MY
BMC Womens Health; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28747206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trends in Mesh Use for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair From the Medicare Database.
Wang LC; Al Hussein Al Awamlh B; Hu JC; Laudano MA; Davison WL; Schulster ML; Zhao F; Chughtai B; Lee RK
Urology; 2015 Nov; 86(5):885-91. PubMed ID: 26344153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Costantini E; Mearini L; Lazzeri M; Bini V; Nunzi E; di Biase M; Porena M
J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 26780167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Age on Complications Rate and Surgical Outcomes in Women Undergoing Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy and Sacrocolpopexy.
Gluck O; Rusavy Z; Grinstein E; Abdelkhalek Y; Deval B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):753-758. PubMed ID: 35123043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: 8 years experience.
Granese R; Candiani M; Perino A; Romano F; Cucinella G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Oct; 146(2):227-31. PubMed ID: 19615810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
