BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

954 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29729338)

  • 21. Starch-based nanocomposites with cellulose nanofibers obtained from chemical and mechanical treatments.
    Tibolla H; Czaikoski A; Pelissari FM; Menegalli FC; Cunha RL
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2020 Oct; 161():132-146. PubMed ID: 32522543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of cellulose nanocrystal and cellulose nanofiber on the properties of pumpkin starch-based composite films.
    Zhang L; Zhao J; Zhang Y; Li F; Jiao X; Li Q
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2021 Dec; 192():444-451. PubMed ID: 34606791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of cellulosic fiber scale on linear and non-linear mechanical performance of starch-based composites.
    Karimi S; Abdulkhani A; Tahir PM; Dufresne A
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2016 Oct; 91():1040-4. PubMed ID: 27339322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preparation and characterization of bio-nanocomposite films based on cassava starch or chitosan, reinforced with montmorillonite or bamboo nanofibers.
    Llanos JHR; Tadini CC
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2018 Feb; 107(Pt A):371-382. PubMed ID: 28888543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bio-nanocomposite films reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals: Rheology of film-forming solutions, transparency, water vapor barrier and tensile properties of films.
    El Miri N; Abdelouahdi K; Barakat A; Zahouily M; Fihri A; Solhy A; El Achaby M
    Carbohydr Polym; 2015 Sep; 129():156-67. PubMed ID: 26050901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of cellulose reinforcement on the properties of organic acid modified starch microparticles/plasticized starch bio-composite films.
    Teacă CA; Bodîrlău R; Spiridon I
    Carbohydr Polym; 2013 Mar; 93(1):307-15. PubMed ID: 23465935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dextrin Nanocomposites as Matrices for Solid Dosage Forms.
    Phillips J; Venter JL; Atanasova M; Wesley-Smith J; Oosthuizen H; Emmambux MN; Du Toit EL; Focke WW
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Apr; 12(14):16969-16977. PubMed ID: 32191427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cellulose nanocrystals-starch nanocomposites produced by extrusion: Structure and behavior in physiological conditions.
    Nessi V; Falourd X; Maigret JE; Cahier K; D'Orlando A; Descamps N; Gaucher V; Chevigny C; Lourdin D
    Carbohydr Polym; 2019 Dec; 225():115123. PubMed ID: 31521280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Preparation and characterization agar-based nanocomposite film reinforced by nanocrystalline cellulose.
    Atef M; Rezaei M; Behrooz R
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2014 Sep; 70():537-44. PubMed ID: 25036597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Preparation and characterization of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose/cotton linter cellulose nanofibril composite films.
    Oun AA; Rhim JW
    Carbohydr Polym; 2015; 127():101-9. PubMed ID: 25965462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biocomposites reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals derived from potato peel waste.
    Chen D; Lawton D; Thompson MR; Liu Q
    Carbohydr Polym; 2012 Sep; 90(1):709-16. PubMed ID: 24751097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of xylooligosaccharides (XOS) in hemicelluloses/chitosan-based films reinforced by cellulose nanofiber: Effect on physicochemical properties.
    Xu J; Xia R; Yuan T; Sun R
    Food Chem; 2019 Nov; 298():125041. PubMed ID: 31261000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Preparation and performance of thermoplastic starch and microcrystalline cellulose for packaging composites: Extrusion and hot pressing.
    Chen J; Wang X; Long Z; Wang S; Zhang J; Wang L
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2020 Dec; 165(Pt B):2295-2302. PubMed ID: 33098894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sandwich panel biocomposite of thermoplastic corn starch and bacterial cellulose.
    Santos TA; Spinacé MAS
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2021 Jan; 167():358-368. PubMed ID: 33278430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Simple green approach to reinforce natural rubber with bacterial cellulose nanofibers.
    Trovatti E; Carvalho AJ; Ribeiro SJ; Gandini A
    Biomacromolecules; 2013 Aug; 14(8):2667-74. PubMed ID: 23782026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using carboxylated cellulose nanofibers to enhance mechanical and barrier properties of collagen fiber film by electrostatic interaction.
    Wang W; Zhang X; Li C; Du G; Zhang H; Ni Y
    J Sci Food Agric; 2018 Jun; 98(8):3089-3097. PubMed ID: 29210456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fabrication of all-cellulose nanocomposites from corn stalk.
    Bian H; Tu P; Chen JY
    J Sci Food Agric; 2020 Sep; 100(12):4390-4399. PubMed ID: 32388869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Starch-based nanocomposites: a comparative performance study of cellulose whiskers and starch nanoparticles.
    Nasseri R; Mohammadi N
    Carbohydr Polym; 2014 Jun; 106():432-9. PubMed ID: 24721099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Morphology, transport characteristics and viscoelastic polymer chain confinement in nanocomposites based on thermoplastic potato starch and cellulose nanofibers from pineapple leaf.
    Balakrishnan P; Sreekala MS; Kunaver M; Huskić M; Thomas S
    Carbohydr Polym; 2017 Aug; 169():176-188. PubMed ID: 28504134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The co-plasticization effects of glycerol and small molecular sugars on starch-based nanocomposite films prepared by extrusion blowing.
    Gao W; Liu P; Li X; Qiu L; Hou H; Cui B
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2019 Jul; 133():1175-1181. PubMed ID: 31051205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 48.