670 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29730314)
1. Comparison of Infrapubic vs Penoscrotal Approaches for 3-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement: Do We Have a Winner?
Palmisano F; Boeri L; Cristini C; Antonini G; Spinelli MG; Franco G; Longo F; Gadda F; Colombo F; Montanari E
Sex Med Rev; 2018 Oct; 6(4):631-639. PubMed ID: 29730314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Following Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Urinary Diversion: Technique and Outcomes.
Loh-Doyle J; Patil MB; Sawkar H; Wayne K; Boyd SD
J Sex Med; 2018 Jun; 15(6):907-913. PubMed ID: 29452979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Infrapubic approach for placement of inflatable penile prosthesis: contemporary review of technique and implications.
Jayadevan R; Eleswarapu SV; Mills JN
Int J Impot Res; 2020 Jan; 32(1):10-17. PubMed ID: 31537910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Infrapubic surgical approach for penile prosthesis surgery: Indications and technique.
Picola Brau N; Torremadé J
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2020 Jun; 44(5):301-308. PubMed ID: 32115278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Penoscrotal versus minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a single-center matched-pair analysis.
Grande P; Antonini G; Cristini C; De Berardinis E; Gatto A; Di Lascio G; Lemma A; Gentile G; Di Pierro GB
World J Urol; 2018 Jul; 36(7):1167-1174. PubMed ID: 29492584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Following Pelvic Radiation: Technical Considerations and Contemporary Outcomes.
Loh-Doyle J; Patil MB; Nakhoda Z; Nassiri N; Yip W; Wayne K; Doumanian L; Boyd SD
J Sex Med; 2018 Jul; 15(7):1049-1054. PubMed ID: 29731428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ambicor Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis: Background and Contemporary Outcomes.
Ko OS; Bennett NE
Sex Med Rev; 2018 Apr; 6(2):319-327. PubMed ID: 28874326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subcoronal inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: indications and outcomes.
Feng CL; Langbo WA; Anderson LK; Cao D; Bajic P; Amarasekera C; Wang V; Levine LA
J Sex Med; 2023 May; 20(6):888-892. PubMed ID: 37076135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ambicor 2-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis: Who and How?
Abdelsayed GA; Levine LA
J Sex Med; 2018 Mar; 15(3):410-415. PubMed ID: 29339015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical technique to maintain penile length after insertion of an inflatable penile prosthesis via infrapubic approach.
Borges F; Hakim L; Kline C
J Sex Med; 2006 May; 3(3):550-3. PubMed ID: 16681481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The good, the bad, and the ugly about surgical approaches for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.
Otero JR; Manfredi C; Wilson SK
Int J Impot Res; 2022 Mar; 34(2):128-137. PubMed ID: 32488210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical approaches for penile prosthesis implantation: penoscrotal vs infrapubic.
Montague DK; Angermeir KW
Int J Impot Res; 2003 Oct; 15 Suppl 5():S134-5. PubMed ID: 14551592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A purely penoscrotal approach: Reservoir placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) in an orthotopic neobladder patient. Case report.
Yeşildal C; Albayrak AT; Yavuzsan AH; Ilgi M; Kireççi SL
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2019 Oct; 91(3):. PubMed ID: 31577105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Placement of Inflatable Penile Implants in Patients With Prior Radical Pelvic Surgery: A Literature Review.
Madiraju SK; Hakky TS; Perito PE; Wallen JJ
Sex Med Rev; 2019 Jan; 7(1):189-197. PubMed ID: 30503795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mid-term outcomes of minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: A single-center study and literature review.
Di Pierro GB; Di Lascio G; Lemma A; Grande P; Frisenda M; Del Giudice F; Antonini G; Nardi F; De Berardinis E; Cristini C; Franco G; Sciarra A; Salciccia S
Andrology; 2024 Mar; 12(3):624-632. PubMed ID: 37452742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Penoscrotal approach for inflatable penile prosthesis implant: why it should be preferred.
Ricapito A; Sedigh O; Rubino M; Gobbo A; Falagario UG; Annese P; Mancini V; Ferro M; Buffi N; Cormio L; Carrieri G; Busetto GM; Bettocchi C
Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2023 Dec; 75(6):711-717. PubMed ID: 38126284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Suprapubic Fat Pad Excision with Simultaneous Placement of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis.
Baumgarten AS; Beilan JA; Shah BB; Loeb A; Bickell M; Parker J; Henry GD; Carrion RE
J Sex Med; 2019 Feb; 16(2):333-337. PubMed ID: 30692027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sub-Coronal Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement With Modified No-Touch Technique: A Step-by-Step Approach With Outcomes.
Weinberg AC; Pagano MJ; Deibert CM; Valenzuela RJ
J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 26805939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Residents at the University of Maryland Medical System provide insight to learning infrapubic approach for IPP surgery: relative benefits but novel challenges exposed in first 15 cases.
Kramer A; Chason J
J Sex Med; 2010 Mar; 7(3):1298-305. PubMed ID: 19929919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: a comparison of the penoscrotal and infrapubic surgical approaches.
Candela JV; Hellstrom WJ
J La State Med Soc; 1996 Jul; 148(7):296-301. PubMed ID: 8816024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
