BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29730494)

  • 1. Brain extraction from normal and pathological images: A joint PCA/Image-Reconstruction approach.
    Han X; Kwitt R; Aylward S; Bakas S; Menze B; Asturias A; Vespa P; Van Horn J; Niethammer M
    Neuroimage; 2018 Aug; 176():431-445. PubMed ID: 29730494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robust brain extraction across datasets and comparison with publicly available methods.
    Iglesias JE; Liu CY; Thompson PM; Tu Z
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Sep; 30(9):1617-34. PubMed ID: 21880566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deep MRI brain extraction: A 3D convolutional neural network for skull stripping.
    Kleesiek J; Urban G; Hubert A; Schwarz D; Maier-Hein K; Bendszus M; Biller A
    Neuroimage; 2016 Apr; 129():460-469. PubMed ID: 26808333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robust skull stripping using multiple MR image contrasts insensitive to pathology.
    Roy S; Butman JA; Pham DL;
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():132-147. PubMed ID: 27864083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A generalizable brain extraction net (BEN) for multimodal MRI data from rodents, nonhuman primates, and humans.
    Yu Z; Han X; Xu W; Zhang J; Marr C; Shen D; Peng T; Zhang XY; Feng J
    Elife; 2022 Dec; 11():. PubMed ID: 36546674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated template-based brain localization and extraction for fetal brain MRI reconstruction.
    Tourbier S; Velasco-Annis C; Taimouri V; Hagmann P; Meuli R; Warfield SK; Bach Cuadra M; Gholipour A
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jul; 155():460-472. PubMed ID: 28408290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brain extraction based on locally linear representation-based classification.
    Huang M; Yang W; Jiang J; Wu Y; Zhang Y; Chen W; Feng Q;
    Neuroimage; 2014 May; 92():322-39. PubMed ID: 24525169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic labeling of MR brain images through extensible learning and atlas forests.
    Xu L; Liu H; Song E; Yan M; Jin R; Hung CC
    Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6329-6340. PubMed ID: 28921541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. EFFICIENT REGISTRATION OF PATHOLOGICAL IMAGES: A JOINT PCA/IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION APPROACH.
    Han X; Yang X; Aylward S; Kwitt R; Niethammer M
    Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging; 2017 Apr; 2017():10-14. PubMed ID: 29887971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An efficient and accurate method for robust inter-dataset brain extraction and comparisons with 9 other methods.
    Novosad P; Collins DL;
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Nov; 39(11):4241-4257. PubMed ID: 29972616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian convolutional neural network based MRI brain extraction on nonhuman primates.
    Zhao G; Liu F; Oler JA; Meyerand ME; Kalin NH; Birn RM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():32-44. PubMed ID: 29604454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An open, multi-vendor, multi-field-strength brain MR dataset and analysis of publicly available skull stripping methods agreement.
    Souza R; Lucena O; Garrafa J; Gobbi D; Saluzzi M; Appenzeller S; Rittner L; Frayne R; Lotufo R
    Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 170():482-494. PubMed ID: 28807870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian principal geodesic analysis for estimating intrinsic diffeomorphic image variability.
    Zhang M; Fletcher PT
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Oct; 25(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 26159890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimizing parameter choice for FSL-Brain Extraction Tool (BET) on 3D T1 images in multiple sclerosis.
    Popescu V; Battaglini M; Hoogstrate WS; Verfaillie SC; Sluimer IC; van Schijndel RA; van Dijk BW; Cover KS; Knol DL; Jenkinson M; Barkhof F; de Stefano N; Vrenken H;
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(4):1484-94. PubMed ID: 22484407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A brain extraction algorithm for infant T2 weighted magnetic resonance images based on fuzzy c-means thresholding.
    Bae I; Chae JH; Han Y
    Sci Rep; 2021 Dec; 11(1):23347. PubMed ID: 34857824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structured Sparse Principal Components Analysis With the TV-Elastic Net Penalty.
    de Pierrefeu A; Lofstedt T; Hadj-Selem F; Dubois M; Jardri R; Fovet T; Ciuciu P; Frouin V; Duchesnay E
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 Feb; 37(2):396-407. PubMed ID: 28880163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated neonatal nnU-Net brain MRI extractor trained on a large multi-institutional dataset.
    Chen JV; Li Y; Tang F; Chaudhari G; Lew C; Lee A; Rauschecker AM; Haskell-Mendoza AP; Wu YW; Calabrese E
    Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4583. PubMed ID: 38403673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An adaptive probabilistic atlas for anomalous brain segmentation in MR images.
    Martins SB; Bragantini J; Falcão AX; Yasuda CL
    Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4940-4950. PubMed ID: 31423590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. VoxResNet: Deep voxelwise residual networks for brain segmentation from 3D MR images.
    Chen H; Dou Q; Yu L; Qin J; Heng PA
    Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 170():446-455. PubMed ID: 28445774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Infant Brain Extraction in T1-Weighted MR Images Using BET and Refinement Using LCDG and MGRF Models.
    Alansary A; Ismail M; Soliman A; Khalifa F; Nitzken M; Elnakib A; Mostapha M; Black A; Stinebruner K; Casanova MF; Zurada JM; El-Baz A
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2016 May; 20(3):925-935. PubMed ID: 25823048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.