725 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29730917)
1. [Laparoscopic type C1 hysterectomy based on the anatomic landmark of the uterus deep vein and its branches for cervical cancer].
Liang MR; Han DX; Jiang W; Liu H; Li L; Zhong ML; Luo L; Zeng SY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 40(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 29730917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up.
Spirtos NM; Eisenkop SM; Schlaerth JB; Ballon SC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Aug; 187(2):340-8. PubMed ID: 12193922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer.
Gil-Moreno A; Puig O; Pérez-Benavente MA; Díaz B; Vergés R; De la Torre J; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15904613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A systematic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique in invasive cervical cancer for preserving postsurgical bladder function.
Sakuragi N; Todo Y; Kudo M; Yamamoto R; Sato T
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(2):389-97. PubMed ID: 15823132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Success Factors of Laparoscopic Nerve-sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Preserving Bladder Function in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Protocol-Based Prospective Cohort Study.
Kim HS; Kim TH; Suh DH; Kim SY; Kim MA; Jeong CW; Hong KS; Song YS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015; 22(6):1987-95. PubMed ID: 25465377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical adenocarcinoma].
Zhang YN; Li B; Wang YT; Liu SH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):600-608. PubMed ID: 32957748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.
Ramirez PT; Slomovitz BM; Soliman PT; Coleman RL; Levenback C
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Aug; 102(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 16472844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modified type IV-V radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of patients with stage III cervical carcinoma. Feasibility, technique, and clinical results.
Benedetti-Panici P; Maneschi F; Cutillo G; Greggi S; Salerno MG; Amoroso M; Scambia G; Mancuso S
Cancer; 1996 Dec; 78(11):2359-65. PubMed ID: 8941007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robot-assisted total preservation of the pelvic autonomic nerve with extended systematic lymphadenectomy as part of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Lee YS; Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1133-8. PubMed ID: 23792607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical Outcomes in Early Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Nerve Plane-sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.
Zhao D; Li B; Wang Y; Liu S; Zhang Y; Yuan G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):687-696. PubMed ID: 31075445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical parametrectomy for occult early-stage invasive cervical cancer after simple hysterectomy.
Li J; Xu H; Chen Y; Wang D; Li Y; Liang Z
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Oct; 22(8):1383-8. PubMed ID: 22964523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Less radical surgery than radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a pilot study.
Pluta M; Rob L; Charvat M; Chmel R; Halaska M; Skapa P; Robova H
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 19264352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robot versus laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a comparison of the intraoperative and perioperative results of a single surgeon's initial experience.
Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1145-9. PubMed ID: 23748178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perioperative morbidity and rate of upstaging after laparoscopic staging for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial.
Köhler C; Mustea A; Marnitz S; Schneider A; Chiantera V; Ulrich U; Scharf JP; Martus P; Vieira MA; Tsunoda A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):503.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25986030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our instruments and technique.
Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Perone C; Iuzzolino D; Rasile M; Tinelli A
Surg Oncol; 2009 Dec; 18(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 18805001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association between prognostic factors and disease-free survival of cervical cancer stage IB1 patients undergoing radical hysterectomy.
Chittithaworn S; Hanprasertpong J; Tungsinmunkong K; Geater A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2007; 8(4):530-4. PubMed ID: 18260723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combined laparoscopic and vaginal radical surgery in cervical cancer.
Renaud MC; Plante M; Roy M
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 11006032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
