108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29731127)
1. The need for triple assessment and predictors for diagnosis of breast cancer in patients <40 years of age.
Mazari FAK; Sharma N; Reid D; Horgan K
Clin Radiol; 2018 Aug; 73(8):758.e19-758.e25. PubMed ID: 29731127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast Cancers Detected at Screening MR Imaging and Mammography in Patients at High Risk: Method of Detection Reflects Tumor Histopathologic Results.
Sung JS; Stamler S; Brooks J; Kaplan J; Huang T; Dershaw DD; Lee CH; Morris EA; Comstock CE
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):716-22. PubMed ID: 27097237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Symptoms and diagnostic work-up in breast cancer].
Kroman NT; Grinsted P; Nielsen NS
Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Sep; 169(36):2980-1. PubMed ID: 17953874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast MR imaging screening in women with a history of breast conservation therapy.
Gweon HM; Cho N; Han W; Yi A; Moon HG; Noh DY; Moon WK
Radiology; 2014 Aug; 272(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 24635678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Waiting time for breast cancer surgery in Quebec.
Mayo NE; Scott SC; Shen N; Hanley J; Goldberg MS; MacDonald N
CMAJ; 2001 Apr; 164(8):1133-8. PubMed ID: 11338798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating wait times from screening to breast cancer diagnosis among women undergoing organised assessment vs usual care.
Chiarelli AM; Muradali D; Blackmore KM; Smith CR; Mirea L; Majpruz V; O'Malley FP; Quan ML; Holloway CM
Br J Cancer; 2017 May; 116(10):1254-1263. PubMed ID: 28359079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.
Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D
Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparative analysis of early diagnostic tools for breast cancer].
Shen SJ; Sun Q; Xu YL; Zhou YD; Guan JH; Mao F; Lin Y; Wang XJ; Han SM
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 34(11):877-80. PubMed ID: 23291142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of breast imaging in predicting outcome of lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) diagnosed at core needle biopsy.
Petrovecki M; Alduk AM; Jakic-Razumovic J; Stern-Padovan R; Bubic V; Prutki M
Tumori; 2016; 102(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 26350202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A modified triple test for palpable breast masses: the value of ultrasound and core needle biopsy.
Wai CJ; Al-Mubarak G; Homer MJ; Goldkamp A; Samenfeld-Specht M; Lee Y; Logvinenko T; Rothschild JG; Graham RA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):850-5. PubMed ID: 23104707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast Cancer Detected at Screening US: Survival Rates and Clinical-Pathologic and Imaging Factors Associated with Recurrence.
Kim SY; Han BK; Kim EK; Choi WJ; Choi Y; Kim HH; Moon WK
Radiology; 2017 Aug; 284(2):354-364. PubMed ID: 28387638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical decision making and factors determining a diagnosis of breast carcinoma in women presenting with nipple discharge.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Singletary SE; Stephens TW; Marcy S; Meric F; Ross MI; Babiera GV; Ames FC; Kuerer HM
J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Mar; 196(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 12648684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast: an analysis of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings in 27 concecutive cases of missed breast cancer.
Shah VI; Raju U; Chitale D; Deshpande V; Gregory N; Strand V
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(8):1824-31. PubMed ID: 12673707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk Stratification For Axillary Lymph Node Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients: What Clinicopathological and Radiological Factors of Primary Breast Cancer Can Predict Preoperatively Axillary Lymph Node Metastases?
Yun SJ; Sohn YM; Seo M
Ultrasound Q; 2017 Mar; 33(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 27428815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Replace fine needle aspiration cytology with automated core biopsy in the triple assessment of breast cancer.
Clarke D; Sudhakaran N; Gateley CA
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2001 Mar; 83(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 11320918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of age, breast density and volume on breast cancer diagnosis: a retrospective comparison of sensitivity of mammography and ultrasonography in China's rural areas.
Wang FL; Chen F; Yin H; Xu N; Wu XX; Ma JJ; Gao S; Tang JH; Lu C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(4):2277-82. PubMed ID: 23725127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound is a useful adjunct to mammography in the assessment of breast tumours in all patients.
McCavert M; O'Donnell ME; Aroori S; Badger SA; Sharif MA; Crothers JG; Spence RA
Int J Clin Pract; 2009 Nov; 63(11):1589-94. PubMed ID: 19686337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Analysis of the results of 137 subclinical breast lesions excisions. Value of ultrasonography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer].
Jacob D; Brombart JC; Muller C; Lefèbvre C; Massa F; Depoerck A
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9091540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How reassuring is a normal breast ultrasound in assessment of a screen-detected mammographic abnormality? A review of interval cancers after assessment that included ultrasound evaluation.
Bennett ML; Welman CJ; Celliers LM
Clin Radiol; 2011 Oct; 66(10):928-39. PubMed ID: 21718976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What Happens after a Diagnosis of High-Risk Breast Lesion at Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Biopsy? An Observational Study of Postdiagnosis Management and Imaging Adherence.
Gao Y; Albert M; Young Lin LL; Lewin AA; Babb JS; Heller SL; Moy L
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):423-431. PubMed ID: 29378151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
