These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29731468)

  • 1. "A New Business in the World": The Telegraph, Privacy, and the U.S. Constitution in the Nineteenth Century.
    Jepsen T
    Technol Cult; 2018; 59(1):95-125. PubMed ID: 29731468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Managing Privacy: Cryptography or Private Networks of Communication in the Nineteenth Century.
    Fava-Verde JF
    Technol Cult; 2020; 61(3):798-814. PubMed ID: 33416791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Telegraph and the Control of Material Movements: A Micro-Study about the Detachment of Communication from Transport.
    Wenzlhuemer R
    Technol Cult; 2017; 58(3):625-649. PubMed ID: 28890454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tucson Woman's Clinic v. Eden.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 2004; 379():531-57. PubMed ID: 16477726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abortion: in search of a constitutional doctrine (Part 1).
    Leyshon DJ
    Med Law; 1991; 10(2):155-83. PubMed ID: 1886465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Roe v. Wade is constitutionally unprincipled and logically incoherent: a brief in support of judicial restraint.
    Gerard JB
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):222-6. PubMed ID: 2603866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can Congress settle the abortion issue?
    Segers MC
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):20-8. PubMed ID: 7107237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. It's been a privilege: advising patients of the Tarasoff duty and its legal consequences for the federal psychotherapist-patient privilege.
    Klinka E
    Fordham Law Rev; 2009 Nov; 78(2):863-931. PubMed ID: 19938380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Privilege, confidentiality, and patient privacy: status 1980.
    Perr IN
    J Forensic Sci; 1981 Jan; 26(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 7205179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Current Legal Status of Drug Testing and Its Implications.
    Beveridge AD
    Forensic Sci Rev; 1992 Dec; 4(2):109-24. PubMed ID: 26267373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. Lawall.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 2002; 307():783-94. PubMed ID: 16477720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
    Goldman EB
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. HIPAA privacy rule and public health. Guidance from CDC and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Suppl; 2003 May; 52():1-17, 19-20. PubMed ID: 12741579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carrying guns in public: legal and public health implications.
    Vernick JS
    J Law Med Ethics; 2013 Mar; 41 Suppl 1():84-7. PubMed ID: 23590749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Doe v. City of New York.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Fed Report; 1994 Jan; 15():264-70. PubMed ID: 11648619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Plowman v. U.S. Department of the Army.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division
    Fed Suppl; 1988 Oct; 698():627-39. PubMed ID: 11648181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the privacy properties of telephone metadata.
    Mayer J; Mutchler P; Mitchell JC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 May; 113(20):5536-41. PubMed ID: 27185922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Privacy protections afforded by computer-based patient record systems.
    Amatayakul M
    Top Health Inf Manage; 1996 May; 16(4):22-7. PubMed ID: 10157658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.