These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29731571)

  • 1. A comparative assessment of bite marks in analyzing the overlay generation using styrofoam sheet and modeling wax with the dental casts as one of the adjuncts for archiving the forensic records: An
    Zainab H; Shaimaa ; Pramod J; Hugar D; Sultana A
    J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2018; 22(1):132-137. PubMed ID: 29731571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study of three commonly used two-dimensional overlay generation methods in bite mark analysis.
    Pajnigara NG; Balpande AS; Motwani MB; Choudhary A; Thakur S; Pajnigara NG
    J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2017; 21(3):442-446. PubMed ID: 29391724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study between xerographic, computer-assisted overlay generation and animated-superimposition methods in bite mark analyses.
    Tai MW; Chong ZF; Asif MK; Rahmat RA; Nambiar P
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2016 Sep; 22():42-8. PubMed ID: 27591538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-based method of bite mark analysis: A benchmark in forensic dentistry?
    Pallam NK; Boaz K; Natrajan S; Raj M; Manaktala N; Lewis AJ
    J Forensic Dent Sci; 2016; 8(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 27051221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of bite marks and teeth features using 2D and 3D methods].
    Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska D; Glapiński M; Zaba C; Łabecka M
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2011; 61(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 22390125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of time-dependent changes in Bitemarks on Styrofoam sheets.
    Parimala D; Daniel MJ; Srinivasan SV; Kumaran JV
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2015 Mar; 6(Suppl 1):S77-80. PubMed ID: 25821381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between five commonly used two-dimensional methods of human bite mark overlay production from the dental study casts.
    Maloth S; Ganapathy KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(3):493. PubMed ID: 22048597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study to evaluate the accuracy of polyether occlusal bite registration material and occlusal registration wax as a guide for occlusal reduction during tooth preparation.
    Joshi N; Shetty SN; Prasad KD
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(6):730-5. PubMed ID: 24552935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Analysis of bite marks].
    Spiessens M; Van der Velden B; Willems G
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2005; 60(3):203-19. PubMed ID: 16370436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the bite mark pattern and intercanine distance between humans and dogs.
    Kashyap B; Anand S; Reddy S; Sahukar SB; Supriya N; Pasupuleti S
    J Forensic Dent Sci; 2015; 7(3):175-9. PubMed ID: 26816456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative forensic evaluation of bite marks with the aid of a shape analysis computer program: Part 1; The development of "SCIP" and the similarity index.
    Nambiar P; Bridges TE; Brown KA
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1995 Dec; 13(2):18-25. PubMed ID: 9227070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of bite mark analysis from food substances: A comparative study.
    Daniel MJ; Pazhani A
    J Forensic Dent Sci; 2015; 7(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 26816463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Matching bite marks using modeling wax plates].
    Wagner R; Madea B; Doberentz E
    Arch Kriminol; 2017 Jan; 239(1-2):18-26. PubMed ID: 29791111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-based production of bite mark comparison overlays.
    Sweet D; Parhar M; Wood RE
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):1050-5. PubMed ID: 9729824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of bite mark overlays: a comparison of five common methods to produce exemplars from a suspect's dentition.
    Sweet D; Bowers CM
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Mar; 43(2):362-7. PubMed ID: 9544542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Seven hundred seventy eight bite marks: analysis by anatomic location, victim and biter demographics, type of crime, and legal disposition.
    Freeman AJ; Senn DR; Arendt DM
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Nov; 50(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 16382842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Presentation and Evaluation of a Modified Wax-Bite Dental Splint for Surgical Navigation in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery.
    Boeckx P; Essig H; Kokemuller H; Tavassol F; Gellrich NC; Swennen GR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 73(11):2189-95. PubMed ID: 25891659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resin dental casts as an aid in bite mark identification.
    McKinstry RE
    J Forensic Sci; 1995 Mar; 40(2):300-2. PubMed ID: 7602295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the accuracy, precision and validity of hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression material for bite mark analysis.
    Reddy SS; Rakesh N; Kaushik A; Devaraju D; Kumar BS
    EXCLI J; 2011; 10():55-61. PubMed ID: 27857665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Error rates in bite mark analysis in an in vivo animal model.
    Avon SL; Victor C; Mayhall JT; Wood RE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):45-55. PubMed ID: 20457498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.