These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29732045)

  • 1. Electroacoustic assessment of wireless remote microphone systems.
    Salehi H; Parsa V; Folkeard P
    Audiol Res; 2018 Mar; 8(1):204. PubMed ID: 29732045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using Microphone Technology to Improve Speech Perception in Noise in Children with Cochlear Implants.
    Johnstone PM; Mills KET; Humphrey E; Yeager KR; Jones E; McElligott K; Pierce A; Agrawal S; Froeling C; Little JP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Oct; 29(9):814-825. PubMed ID: 30278866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Hearing Aid Directionality and Remote Microphone on Speech Intelligibility in Complex Listening Situations.
    Wagener KC; Vormann M; Latzel M; Mülder HE
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804945. PubMed ID: 30322342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of Wireless Remote Microphone on Speech Recognition in Noise for Hearing Aid Users in China.
    Chen J; Wang Z; Dong R; Fu X; Wang Y; Wang S
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():643205. PubMed ID: 33912004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrating a remote microphone with hearing-aid processing.
    Kates JM; Arehart KH; Harvey LO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jun; 145(6):3551. PubMed ID: 31255148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An objective measure for selecting microphone modes in OMNI/DIR hearing aid circuits.
    Grant KW; Elhilali M; Shamma SA; Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT; Summers V
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 18595186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Benefit of Remote Microphones Using Four Wireless Protocols.
    Rodemerk KS; Galster JA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):724-731. PubMed ID: 26333880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Remote-Microphone Benefit in Noise and Reverberation for Children Who are Hard of Hearing.
    Lewis D; Spratford M; Stecker GC; McCreery RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jun; 33(6):330-341. PubMed ID: 36577441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of wireless remote microphone application on speech discrimination in noise in children with cochlear implants.
    Mehrkian S; Bayat Z; Javanbakht M; Emamdjomeh H; Bakhshi E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 125():192-195. PubMed ID: 31369931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress.
    Mueller HG
    Trends Amplif; 2001 Jun; 5(2):35-68. PubMed ID: 25425897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Verification Protocol for Signal Transparency Using the Cochlear Mini-Microphone 2+ and Digital Modulation Transmitter and Receiver with Cochlear Implants.
    Sousa R; Nair E; Wannagot S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):198-207. PubMed ID: 30461401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effects of FM and Hearing Aid Microphone Settings, FM Gain, and Ambient Noise Levels on SNR at the Tympanic Membrane.
    Norrix LW; Camarota K; Harris FP; Dean J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 26905531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit.
    Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):472-84. PubMed ID: 14663347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of cochlear's SCAN and wireless microphones to improve speech understanding in noise with the Nucleus6® CP900 processor.
    De Ceulaer G; Pascoal D; Vanpoucke F; Govaerts PJ
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):837-843. PubMed ID: 28695749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Cochlear™ Nucleus
    Razza S; Zaccone M; Meli A; Cristofari E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():71-75. PubMed ID: 29224769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fitting Assistive Technology for People with Hearing Loss: The Importance of Remote Microphone Systems' Electroacoustic Verification.
    Jacob RTS; Paccola ECM; Bucuvic ÉC; Salgado MH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Dec; 18(24):. PubMed ID: 34948860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
    Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.