130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29732203)
1. Is magnetic resonance imaging helpful in detecting significant prostate cancer in patients with haematospermia, normal prostate specific antigen level and digital rectal examination. A single institution, observational, and retrospective study in a United Kingdom hospital.
Turo R; Horsu S; Calinciuc A; Smolski M; Thygesen H; Doyle G; Gulur DM; Das S; Pettersson B; Awsare N
Cent European J Urol; 2018; 71(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 29732203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Haematospermia as a presenting symptom: outcomes of investigation in 300 men.
Ng YH; Seeley JP; Smith G
Surgeon; 2013 Feb; 11(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 22682581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer.
Rais-Bahrami S; Siddiqui MM; Turkbey B; Stamatakis L; Logan J; Hoang AN; Walton-Diaz A; Vourganti S; Truong H; Kruecker J; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Choyke PL; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1721-1727. PubMed ID: 23727310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of the digital rectal examination as diagnostic test for prostate cancer detection in obese patients.
Dell'Atti L
J BUON; 2015; 20(6):1601-5. PubMed ID: 26854458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Value of Endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate in Improving the Detection of Anterior Prostate Cancer.
Zugor V; Kühn R; Engelhard K; Poth S; Bernat MM; Porres D; Labanaris AP
Anticancer Res; 2016 Aug; 36(8):4279-83. PubMed ID: 27466544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].
Zuo MZ; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Zhang CY; Wen R; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Wu JF; Li X; Shen JK
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 97(47):3693-3698. PubMed ID: 29325321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate Volume Index Is Able to Differentiate between Prostatic Chronic Inflammation and Prostate Cancer in Patients with Normal Digital Rectal Examination and Prostate-Specific Antigen Values <10 ng/mL: Results of 564 Biopsy Naïve Cases.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Novella G; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Amigoni N; Rizzetto R; Shakir A; Panunzio A; De Michele M; Brunelli M; Cerruto MA; Migliorini F; Siracusano S; Artibani W
Urol Int; 2019; 103(4):415-422. PubMed ID: 31466070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility of digital rectal examination in a population with prostate cancer treated with active surveillance.
Herrera-Caceres JO; Wettstein MS; Goldberg H; Toi A; Chandrasekar T; Woon DTS; Ahmad AE; Sanmamed-Salgado N; Alhunaidi O; Ajib K; Nason G; Tan GH; Fleshner N; Klotz L
Can Urol Assoc J; 2020 Sep; 14(9):E453-E457. PubMed ID: 32223879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining Prostate Health Index density, magnetic resonance imaging and prior negative biopsy status to improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Druskin SC; Tosoian JJ; Young A; Collica S; Srivastava A; Ghabili K; Macura KJ; Carter HB; Partin AW; Sokoll LJ; Ross AE; Pavlovich CP
BJU Int; 2018 Apr; 121(4):619-626. PubMed ID: 29232037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy improves detection rates of prostate cancer in pre-biopsied patients].
Maxeiner A; Fischer T; Stephan C; Cash H; Slowinski T; Kilic E; Durmus T
Aktuelle Urol; 2014 May; 45(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 24902069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted vs. conventional transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: single-institution, matched cohort comparison.
Kim EH; Vemana G; Johnson MH; Vetter JM; Rensing AJ; Strother MC; Fowler KJ; Andriole GL
Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25655682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Usefulness of pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical variables to reduce initial prostate biopsy in men with suspected clinically localized prostate cancer.
Numao N; Yoshida S; Komai Y; Ishii C; Kagawa M; Kijima T; Yokoyama M; Ishioka J; Matsuoka Y; Koga F; Saito K; Masuda H; Fujii Y; Kawakami S; Kihara K
J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):502-8. PubMed ID: 23473904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of low free to total PSA ratio in prostate cancer screening: detection rates, clinical and pathological findings in Brazilian men with serum PSA levels <4.0 ng/mL.
Faria EF; Carvalhal GF; dos Reis RB; Tobias-Machado M; Vieira RA; Reis LO; Nogueira L; Machado RD; Freitas CH; Magnabosco WJ; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E653-7. PubMed ID: 22892057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Soligo M; De Cobelli F; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Esposito A; Brembilla G; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):594-600. PubMed ID: 31204312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Value of Transrectal Shear Wave Elastography for Prostate Cancer Detection in Peripheral Zone: Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Fu S; Tang Y; Tan S; Zhao Y; Cui L
J Endourol; 2020 May; 34(5):558-566. PubMed ID: 32164448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of risk factors for determining the need for prostate biopsy in patients with negative MRI.
Liang L; Qi F; Cheng Y; Zhang L; Cao D; Cheng G; Hua L
Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6048. PubMed ID: 33723287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
