260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29732480)
1. Patient-Focused Online Resources for Melanoma: Highly Variable Content and Quality.
Alshaikh EA; Almedimigh AF; Alruwaili AM; Almajnoni AH; Alhajiahmed A; Almalki TS; Alfaraj SZ; Pines JM
J Cancer Educ; 2019 Aug; 34(4):775-781. PubMed ID: 29732480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Readability of online patient resources for melanoma.
Ibrahim AM; Vargas CR; Koolen PG; Chuang DJ; Lin SJ; Lee BT
Melanoma Res; 2016 Feb; 26(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 26479217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Internet Websites for Chest Pain Symptoms Demonstrate Highly Variable Content and Quality.
Joury AU; Alshathri M; Alkhunaizi M; Jaleesah N; Pines JM
Acad Emerg Med; 2016 Oct; 23(10):1146-1152. PubMed ID: 27341392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The variation in quality and content of patient-focused health information on the Internet for otitis media.
Joury A; Joraid A; Alqahtani F; Alghamdi A; Batwa A; Pines JM
Child Care Health Dev; 2018 Mar; 44(2):221-226. PubMed ID: 28913967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument.
Kaicker J; Borg Debono V; Dang W; Buckley N; Thabane L
BMC Med; 2010 Oct; 8():59. PubMed ID: 20939875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing Readability and Reliability of Online Patient Information Regarding Vestibular Schwannoma.
Spiers H; Amin N; Lakhani R; Martin AJ; Patel PM
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e470-e475. PubMed ID: 28885483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.
Martin A; Stewart JR; Gaskins J; Medlin E
J Cancer Educ; 2019 Jun; 34(3):435-440. PubMed ID: 29353371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Testicular Cancer on the Web-an Appropriate Source of Patient Information in Concordance with the European Association of Urology Guidelines?
Paffenholz P; Salem J; Borgmann H; Nestler T; Pfister D; Ruf C; Tsaur I; Haferkamp A; Heidenreich A
J Cancer Educ; 2018 Dec; 33(6):1314-1322. PubMed ID: 28776306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Voice Disorders.
Dueppen AJ; Bellon-Harn ML; Radhakrishnan N; Manchaiah V
J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 29254598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uterine Artery Embolization: An Analysis of Online Patient Information Quality and Readability with Historical Comparison.
Murray TE; Mansoor T; Bowden DJ; O'Neill DC; Lee MJ
Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 29331361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and Readability of Websites on Kidney and Bladder Cancers.
Azer SA; Alghofaili MM; Alsultan RM; Alrumaih NS
J Cancer Educ; 2018 Aug; 33(4):926-944. PubMed ID: 28281091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An online readability analysis of pathology-related patient education articles: an opportunity for pathologists to educate patients.
Prabhu AV; Kim C; Crihalmeanu T; Hansberry DR; Agarwal N; DeFrances MC; Trejo Bittar HE
Hum Pathol; 2017 Jul; 65():15-20. PubMed ID: 28504209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The quality of information about sickle cell disease on the Internet for youth.
Breakey VR; Harris L; Davis O; Agarwal A; Ouellette C; Akinnawo E; Stinson J
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2017 Apr; 64(4):. PubMed ID: 27786409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diabetes websites accredited by the Health On the Net Foundation Code of Conduct: readable or not?
Kusec S; Brborovic O; Schillinger D
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 95():655-60. PubMed ID: 14664062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
