These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29732480)

  • 1. Patient-Focused Online Resources for Melanoma: Highly Variable Content and Quality.
    Alshaikh EA; Almedimigh AF; Alruwaili AM; Almajnoni AH; Alhajiahmed A; Almalki TS; Alfaraj SZ; Pines JM
    J Cancer Educ; 2019 Aug; 34(4):775-781. PubMed ID: 29732480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Readability of online patient resources for melanoma.
    Ibrahim AM; Vargas CR; Koolen PG; Chuang DJ; Lin SJ; Lee BT
    Melanoma Res; 2016 Feb; 26(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 26479217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
    Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Internet Websites for Chest Pain Symptoms Demonstrate Highly Variable Content and Quality.
    Joury AU; Alshathri M; Alkhunaizi M; Jaleesah N; Pines JM
    Acad Emerg Med; 2016 Oct; 23(10):1146-1152. PubMed ID: 27341392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
    Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The variation in quality and content of patient-focused health information on the Internet for otitis media.
    Joury A; Joraid A; Alqahtani F; Alghamdi A; Batwa A; Pines JM
    Child Care Health Dev; 2018 Mar; 44(2):221-226. PubMed ID: 28913967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument.
    Kaicker J; Borg Debono V; Dang W; Buckley N; Thabane L
    BMC Med; 2010 Oct; 8():59. PubMed ID: 20939875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
    Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing Readability and Reliability of Online Patient Information Regarding Vestibular Schwannoma.
    Spiers H; Amin N; Lakhani R; Martin AJ; Patel PM
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e470-e475. PubMed ID: 28885483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
    Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
    JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.
    Martin A; Stewart JR; Gaskins J; Medlin E
    J Cancer Educ; 2019 Jun; 34(3):435-440. PubMed ID: 29353371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy, readability, and quality of websites about metastatic renal cell carcinoma treatment.
    Shakhnazaryan N; Gima-Lange L; Desai A; Fitzgerald K; Kwon DH
    Urol Oncol; 2024 Nov; 42(11):375.e1-375.e13. PubMed ID: 38955572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testicular Cancer on the Web-an Appropriate Source of Patient Information in Concordance with the European Association of Urology Guidelines?
    Paffenholz P; Salem J; Borgmann H; Nestler T; Pfister D; Ruf C; Tsaur I; Haferkamp A; Heidenreich A
    J Cancer Educ; 2018 Dec; 33(6):1314-1322. PubMed ID: 28776306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Voice Disorders.
    Dueppen AJ; Bellon-Harn ML; Radhakrishnan N; Manchaiah V
    J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 29254598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
    O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uterine Artery Embolization: An Analysis of Online Patient Information Quality and Readability with Historical Comparison.
    Murray TE; Mansoor T; Bowden DJ; O'Neill DC; Lee MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 29331361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
    Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and Readability of Websites on Kidney and Bladder Cancers.
    Azer SA; Alghofaili MM; Alsultan RM; Alrumaih NS
    J Cancer Educ; 2018 Aug; 33(4):926-944. PubMed ID: 28281091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An online readability analysis of pathology-related patient education articles: an opportunity for pathologists to educate patients.
    Prabhu AV; Kim C; Crihalmeanu T; Hansberry DR; Agarwal N; DeFrances MC; Trejo Bittar HE
    Hum Pathol; 2017 Jul; 65():15-20. PubMed ID: 28504209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The quality of information about sickle cell disease on the Internet for youth.
    Breakey VR; Harris L; Davis O; Agarwal A; Ouellette C; Akinnawo E; Stinson J
    Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2017 Apr; 64(4):. PubMed ID: 27786409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.