These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29732482)
1. A systematic review of the measurement properties of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer In-patient Satisfaction with Care Questionnaire, the EORTC IN-PATSAT32. Neijenhuijs KI; Jansen F; Aaronson NK; Brédart A; Groenvold M; Holzner B; Terwee CB; Cuijpers P; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM Support Care Cancer; 2018 Aug; 26(8):2551-2560. PubMed ID: 29732482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer patients: systematic review of measurement properties of the EORTC QLQ-CR29. van der Hout A; Neijenhuijs KI; Jansen F; van Uden-Kraan CF; Aaronson NK; Groenvold M; Holzner B; Terwee CB; van de Poll-Franse LV; Cuijpers P; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM Support Care Cancer; 2019 Jul; 27(7):2395-2412. PubMed ID: 30982095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)-A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties. Neijenhuijs KI; Hooghiemstra N; Holtmaat K; Aaronson NK; Groenvold M; Holzner B; Terwee CB; Cuijpers P; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM J Sex Med; 2019 May; 16(5):640-660. PubMed ID: 30956110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties. Neijenhuijs KI; Holtmaat K; Aaronson NK; Holzner B; Terwee CB; Cuijpers P; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM J Sex Med; 2019 Jul; 16(7):1078-1091. PubMed ID: 31147249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32). Brédart A; Bottomley A; Blazeby JM; Conroy T; Coens C; D'Haese S; Chie WC; Hammerlid E; Arraras JI; Efficace F; Rodary C; Schraub S; Costantini M; Costantini A; Joly F; Sezer O; Razavi D; Mehlitz M; Bielska-Lasota M; Aaronson NK; Eur J Cancer; 2005 Sep; 41(14):2120-31. PubMed ID: 16182120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of satisfaction with care EORTC-in-patsat32 questionnaire among Iranian cancer patients. Pishkuhi MA; Salmaniyan S; Nedjat S; Zendedel K; Lari MA Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(23):10121-8. PubMed ID: 25556436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Health-related quality of life in osteoporosis: a systematic review of measurement properties of the QUALEFFO-41. Choo YW; Mohd Tahir NA; Mohamed Said MS; Makmor Bakry M Osteoporos Int; 2024 May; 35(5):745-757. PubMed ID: 38194151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review of the measurement properties of the Body Image Scale (BIS) in cancer patients. Melissant HC; Neijenhuijs KI; Jansen F; Aaronson NK; Groenvold M; Holzner B; Terwee CB; van Uden-Kraan CF; Cuijpers P; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM Support Care Cancer; 2018 Jun; 26(6):1715-1726. PubMed ID: 29532245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care questionnaire: EORTC IN-PATSAT32 Validation study for Spanish patients. Arraras JI; Vera R; Martínez M; Hernández B; Laínez N; Rico M; Vila M; Chicata V; Asín G Clin Transl Oncol; 2009 Apr; 11(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 19380301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient-reported outcome measures for medication treatment satisfaction: a systematic review of measure development and measurement properties. Yang M; Zhang P; Halladay J; Zou K; Choonara I; Ji X; Zhang S; Yan W; Huang L; Lu X; Wang H; Jiang Y; Liu X; Zeng L; Zhang L; Guyatt GH BMC Med; 2024 Sep; 22(1):347. PubMed ID: 39218858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of EORTC IN-PATSAT32 for Chinese cancer patients. Zhang L; Dai Z; Cheng S; Xie S; Woo SM; Luo Z; Wu J; Gao T; Liu J; Zhang K; Zhang J; Jia X; Miller AR; Wang C Support Care Cancer; 2015 Sep; 23(9):2721-30. PubMed ID: 25663542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring patient centeredness with German language Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREM)-A systematic review and qualitative analysis according to COSMIN. Mihaljevic AL; Doerr-Harim C; Kalkum E; Strunk G PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0264045. PubMed ID: 36445889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Instruments to assess self-care among healthy children: A systematic review of measurement properties. Urpí-Fernández AM; Zabaleta-Del-Olmo E; Montes-Hidalgo J; Tomás-Sábado J; Roldán-Merino JF; Lluch-Canut MT J Adv Nurs; 2017 Dec; 73(12):2832-2844. PubMed ID: 28617980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Mason SJ; Catto JWF; Downing A; Bottomley SE; Glaser AW; Wright P BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):760-773. PubMed ID: 29726085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychometric evaluation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer in-patient satisfaction with care questionnaire ('Sinhala' version) for use in a South-Asian setting. Jayasekara H; Rajapaksa L; Bredart A Int J Qual Health Care; 2008 Jun; 20(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 18339668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Assess Outpatient Postpartum Recovery: A Systematic Review. Sultan P; Sharawi N; Blake L; Ando K; Sultan E; Aghaeepour N; Carvalho B; Sadana N JAMA Netw Open; 2021 May; 4(5):e2111600. PubMed ID: 34042993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are validated outcome measures used in distal radial fractures truly valid? A critical assessment using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Kleinlugtenbelt YV; Nienhuis RW; Bhandari M; Goslings JC; Poolman RW; Scholtes VA Bone Joint Res; 2016 Apr; 5(4):153-61. PubMed ID: 27132246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adults and Adolescents With Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review of Construct Validity, Reliability, Responsiveness, and Interpretability Using the COSMIN Methodology. Hoglund LT; Scalzitti DA; Jayaseelan DJ; Bolgla LA; Wainwright SF J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2023 Aug; 53(8):460–479. PubMed ID: 37339377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures used to assess the sleep quality in adults with high prevalence chronic pain conditions: a systematic review. Phelps C; Bellon S; Hinkey M; Nash A; Boyd J; Cook CE; Garcia AN Sleep Med; 2020 Oct; 74():315-331. PubMed ID: 32890946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A systematic review evaluating the clinimetric properties of the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment (VISA) questionnaires for lower limb tendinopathy shows moderate to high-quality evidence for sufficient reliability, validity and responsiveness-part II. Korakakis V; Whiteley R; Kotsifaki A; Stefanakis M; Sotiralis Y; Thorborg K Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Sep; 29(9):2765-2788. PubMed ID: 33860806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]