These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29732748)

  • 21. In vitro evaluation of insertion and removal torques of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Pithon MM; Nojima MG; Nojima LI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 40(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 21050721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Long-term evaluation of factors affecting removal torque of microimplants.
    Kim HJ; Park HS
    Prog Orthod; 2021 Nov; 22(1):42. PubMed ID: 34778924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Placement and removal torque values of orthodontic miniscrew implants.
    Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):669-78. PubMed ID: 21536211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bone density effects on the success rate of orthodontic microimplants evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Lee MY; Park JH; Kim SC; Kang KH; Cho JH; Cho JW; Chang NY; Chae JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 26827978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dynamic simulation of the self-tapping insertion process of orthodontic microimplants into cortical bone with a 3-dimensional finite element method.
    Yu W; Park HS; Kyung HM; Kwon OW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Dec; 142(6):834-41. PubMed ID: 23195369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of bone architecture on the primary stability of different mini-implant designs.
    da Cunha AC; Marquezan M; Lima I; Lopes RT; Nojima LI; Sant'Anna EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25533071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mechanical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants of different lengths.
    Pithon MM; Figueiredo DS; Oliveira DD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 71(3):479-86. PubMed ID: 23273488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of stainless steel and titanium alloy orthodontic miniscrew implants: a mechanical and histologic analysis.
    Brown RN; Sexton BE; Gabriel Chu TM; Katona TR; Stewart KT; Kyung HM; Liu SS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 24703288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bicortical microimplant with 2 anchorage heads for mesial movement of posterior tooth in the beagle dog.
    Wu JC; Huang JN; Zhao SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 17826604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optimal force magnitude loaded to orthodontic microimplants: A finite element analysis.
    Alrbata RH; Momani MQ; Al-Tarawneh AM; Ihyasat A
    Angle Orthod; 2016 Mar; 86(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 26098865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biomechanical evaluation of an orthodontic miniimplant used with revolving (translation and rotation) temporary anchorage device by finite element analysis and experimental testing.
    Lin YS; Yu JH; Chang YZ; Lin CL
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 23303268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of surface characteristics on survival rates of mini-implants.
    Chaddad K; Ferreira AF; Geurs N; Reddy MS
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 18193961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mechanical loading of orthodontic miniscrews - significance and problems: an experimental study.
    Reicheneder C; Rottner K; Bokan I; Mai R; Lauer G; Richter G; Gedrange T; Proff P
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Oct; 53(5):242-5. PubMed ID: 18840065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Horizontal pull-out strength of orthodontic infrazygomatic mini-implant: an in vitro study.
    Chen CM; Wu JH; Lu PC; Wang HC; Lee HE; Wang CH; Du JK
    Implant Dent; 2011 Apr; 20(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 21448023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of thread shape on the pullout strength of miniscrews.
    Gracco A; Giagnorio C; Incerti Parenti S; Alessandri Bonetti G; Siciliani G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 22858327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Minor tooth movements using microimplant anchorage: case reports.
    Sohn DS; Lee JK; An KM
    Implant Dent; 2008 Mar; 17(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 18332756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Radiographic and surgical template for placement of orthodontic microimplants in interradicular areas: a technical note.
    Wu JC; Huang JN; Zhao SF; Xu XJ; Xie ZJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 16955616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of cortical thickness on the stability of mini-implants with microthreads.
    Vilani GN; Ruellas AC; Mattos CT; Fernandes DJ; Elias CN
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25627887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of autoclaving on the fracture torque of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Mattos CT; Ruellas AC; Sant'anna EF
    J Orthod; 2011 Mar; 38(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 21367824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microcomputed tomographic analysis of bone reaction at insertion of orthodontic mini-implants in sheep.
    Rebaudi A; Laffi N; Benedicenti S; Angiero F; Romanos GE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1233-40. PubMed ID: 22167428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.