These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29733673)

  • 1. Learned suppression for multiple distractors in visual search.
    Won BY; Geng JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1128-1141. PubMed ID: 29733673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.
    Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
    Kerzel D; Witzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The attentional template is shifted and asymmetrically sharpened by distractor context.
    Yu X; Geng JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):336-353. PubMed ID: 30742475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiological evidence of low salience distractor interference during visual search.
    Fortier-Gauthier U; Jolicœur P
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13068. PubMed ID: 29423999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 29309194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learned and cued distractor rejection for multiple features in visual search.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):359-376. PubMed ID: 30421366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamics of Feature-based Attentional Selection during Color-Shape Conjunction Search.
    Lee J; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ; Geng JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1773-1787. PubMed ID: 30063176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning to suppress salient distractors in the target dimension: Region-based inhibition is persistent and transfers to distractors in a nontarget dimension.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2080-2097. PubMed ID: 30688477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distractor rejection in visual search breaks down with more than a single distractor feature.
    Kerzel D; Barras C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 May; 42(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 26594882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptability and specificity of inhibition processes in distractor-induced blindness.
    Winther GN; Niedeggen M
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1882-1898. PubMed ID: 28892157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expected distractor context biases the attentional template for target shapes.
    Lerebourg M; de Lange FP; Peelen MV
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Sep; 49(9):1236-1255. PubMed ID: 37410402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distractor probability changes the shape of the attentional template.
    Geng JJ; DiQuattro NE; Helm J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1993-2007. PubMed ID: 28425732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expectations and perceptual priming in a visual search task: Evidence from eye movements and behavior.
    Shurygina O; Kristjánsson Á; Tudge L; Chetverikov A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):489-499. PubMed ID: 30816788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can templates-for-rejection suppress real-world affective objects in visual search?
    Brown CRH; Derakshan N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Aug; 31(4):1843-1855. PubMed ID: 38316718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Passive exposure attenuates distraction during visual search.
    Won BY; Geng JJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Oct; 149(10):1987-1995. PubMed ID: 32250138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence reveals the effects of trait anxiety on contingent attentional capture.
    Tsai YC; Lu HJ; Chang CF; Liang WK; Muggleton NG; Juan CH
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 17(5):973-983. PubMed ID: 28656503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.