241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29733696)
21. [What surgical treatment for femoro-acetabular impingement?].
Gauthier M; Zingg M; Hannouche D
Rev Med Suisse; 2023 Dec; 19(854):2350-2356. PubMed ID: 38088406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Hip MRI: Prevalence of articular cartilage defects and labral tears in asymptomatic volunteers. A comparison with a matched population of patients with femoroacetabular impingement.
Tresch F; Dietrich TJ; Pfirrmann CWA; Sutter R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Aug; 46(2):440-451. PubMed ID: 27981665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Measuring femoral and rotational alignment: EOS system versus computed tomography.
Folinais D; Thelen P; Delin C; Radier C; Catonne Y; Lazennec JY
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 99(5):509-16. PubMed ID: 23877073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reliability and predictability of the centre-edge angle in the assessment of pincer femoroacetabular impingement.
Kutty S; Schneider P; Faris P; Kiefer G; Frizzell B; Park R; Powell JN
Int Orthop; 2012 Mar; 36(3):505-10. PubMed ID: 21720863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can We Discriminate Symptomatic Hip Patients From Asymptomatic Volunteers Based on Anatomic Predictors? A 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Study on Cam, Pincer, and Spinopelvic Parameters.
Mascarenhas VV; Rego P; Dantas P; Caetano AP; Jans L; Sutter R; Marques RM; Ayeni OR; Consciência JG
Am J Sports Med; 2018 Nov; 46(13):3097-3110. PubMed ID: 30379583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Beyond the alpha angle: Alternative measurements for quantifying cam-type deformities in femoroacetabular impingement.
Ehrmann C; Rosskopf AB; Pfirrmann CW; Sutter R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(4):1024-31. PubMed ID: 25639986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Characterization of symptomatic hip impingement in butterfly ice hockey goalies.
Ross JR; Bedi A; Stone RM; Sibilsky Enselman E; Kelly BT; Larson CM
Arthroscopy; 2015 Apr; 31(4):635-42. PubMed ID: 25498869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of Femoral Torsion on Magnetic Resonance Imaging is More Reliable Using Axial-Oblique Sequences Compared With Standard Axial Slices in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.
Alter TD; Kunze KN; Newhouse AC; Bessa F; DeFroda S; Williams J; Nho SJ
Arthroscopy; 2022 Jun; 38(6):1857-1866. PubMed ID: 34838988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. What are the demographic and radiographic characteristics of patients with symptomatic extraarticular femoroacetabular impingement?
Ricciardi BF; Fabricant PD; Fields KG; Poultsides L; Zaltz I; Sink EL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 473(4):1299-308. PubMed ID: 25344401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Regional muscle changes in adult dysfunctional hip conditions of femoroacetabular impingement and hip dysplasia.
Chalian M; Schauwecker N; Cai A; Dessouky R; Fey N; Xi Y; Chhabra A; Wells J
Skeletal Radiol; 2020 Jan; 49(1):101-108. PubMed ID: 31254007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Best Practices: Hip Femoroacetabular Impingement.
Schmaranzer F; Kheterpal AB; Bredella MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):585-598. PubMed ID: 33474984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The prevalence of radiographic findings of structural hip deformities in female collegiate athletes.
Kapron AL; Peters CL; Aoki SK; Beckmann JT; Erickson JA; Anderson MB; Pelt CE
Am J Sports Med; 2015 Jun; 43(6):1324-30. PubMed ID: 25828079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of T2 Values in the Lateral and Medial Portions of the Weight-Bearing Cartilage of the Hip for Patients With Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement and Asymptomatic Volunteers.
Ferro FP; Ho CP; Dornan GJ; Surowiec RK; Philippon MJ
Arthroscopy; 2015 Aug; 31(8):1497-506. PubMed ID: 25896275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Radiographic comparison of surgical hip dislocation and hip arthroscopy for treatment of cam deformity in femoroacetabular impingement.
Bedi A; Zaltz I; De La Torre K; Kelly BT
Am J Sports Med; 2011 Jul; 39 Suppl():20S-8S. PubMed ID: 21709028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Femoral Torsion: Impact of Femur Position on CT and Stereoradiography Measurements.
Morvan G; Guerini H; Carré G; Vuillemin V
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):W93-W99. PubMed ID: 28570094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Incidence of greater trochanteric pain syndrome in patients suspected for femoroacetabular impingement evaluated using magnetic resonance arthrography of the hip.
Pozzi G; Lanza E; Parra CG; Merli I; Sconfienza LM; Zerbi A
Radiol Med; 2017 Mar; 122(3):208-214. PubMed ID: 27943098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Femoral and tibial torsion measurement in children and adolescents: comparison of 3D models based on low-dose biplanar radiography and low-dose CT.
Rosskopf AB; Ramseier LE; Sutter R; Pfirrmann CW; Buck FM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):W285-91. PubMed ID: 24555627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. T1ρ Hip Cartilage Mapping in Assessing Patients With Cam Morphology: How Can We Optimize the Regions of Interest?
Anwander H; Rakhra KS; Melkus G; Beaulé PE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):1066-1075. PubMed ID: 27506970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of Femoral Antetorsion With MRI: Comparison of Oblique Measurements to Standard Transverse Measurements.
Sutter R; Dietrich TJ; Zingg PO; Pfirrmann CW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jul; 205(1):130-5. PubMed ID: 26102391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Arthroscopic Management of Dysplastic Hip Deformities: Predictors of Success and Failures With Comparison to an Arthroscopic FAI Cohort.
Larson CM; Ross JR; Stone RM; Samuelson KM; Schelling EF; Giveans MR; Bedi A
Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):447-53. PubMed ID: 26620299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
