These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29733752)

  • 1. Evidence of Serial Processing in Visual Word Recognition.
    White AL; Palmer J; Boynton GM
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Jul; 29(7):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 29733752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual word recognition: Evidence for a serial bottleneck in lexical access.
    White AL; Palmer J; Boynton GM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):2000-2017. PubMed ID: 31832892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid extraction of gist from visual text and its influence on word recognition.
    Asano M; Yokosawa K
    J Gen Psychol; 2011; 138(2):127-54. PubMed ID: 21560469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Word position coding in reading is noisy.
    Snell J; Grainger J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):609-615. PubMed ID: 30798470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is there a serial bottleneck in visual object recognition?
    Popovkina DV; Palmer J; Moore CM; Boynton GM
    J Vis; 2021 Mar; 21(3):15. PubMed ID: 33704373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emotion and attention in visual word processing: an ERP study.
    Kissler J; Herbert C; Winkler I; Junghofer M
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Jan; 80(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 18439739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural Correlates of Word Recognition: A Systematic Comparison of Natural Reading and Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.
    Kornrumpf B; Niefind F; Sommer W; Dimigen O
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 28(9):1374-91. PubMed ID: 27167402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The independence of letter identity and letter doubling in reading.
    Fischer-Baum S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):873-878. PubMed ID: 27542802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective effects of knowledge on visual perception.
    Lupyan G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):794-806. PubMed ID: 28345946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval: Further data.
    Craik FIM; Eftekhari E; Binns MA
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1263-1277. PubMed ID: 29934748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: typicality effects and orthographic correlates.
    Arciuli J; Cupples L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):920-48. PubMed ID: 16608755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonological-orthographic consistency for Japanese words and its impact on visual and auditory word recognition.
    Hino Y; Kusunose Y; Miyamura S; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):126-146. PubMed ID: 27808550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual variability in the semantic processing of English compound words.
    Schmidtke D; Van Dyke JA; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Mar; 44(3):421-439. PubMed ID: 28933895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semantic information mediates visual attention during spoken word recognition in Chinese: Evidence from the printed-word version of the visual-world paradigm.
    Shen W; Qu Q; Li X
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1267-84. PubMed ID: 26993126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eye-Movement Evidence for Object-Based Attention in Chinese Reading.
    Liu Y; Reichle ED
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Feb; 29(2):278-287. PubMed ID: 29185866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Capacity limitations in visual word processing.
    Mullin PA; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):111-23. PubMed ID: 2522521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conflict resolved: On the role of spatial attention in reading and color naming tasks.
    Robidoux S; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1709-16. PubMed ID: 25862427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semantic Richness and Aging: The Effect of Number of Features in the Lexical Decision Task.
    Robert C; Rico Duarte L
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Apr; 45(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 25680348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention and eye-movement control in reading: The selective reading paradigm.
    Reingold EM; Sheridan H; Meadmore KL; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2003-2020. PubMed ID: 27643527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Severe processing capacity limits for sub-lexical features of letter strings.
    Campbell M; Oppenheimer N; White AL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Feb; 86(2):643-652. PubMed ID: 38172462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.