225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29734053)
1. The evaluation and validation of Phadebas
Wornes DJ; Speers SJ; Murakami JA
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():81-88. PubMed ID: 29734053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applicability of two commercially available kits for forensic identification of saliva stains.
Pang BC; Cheung BK
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Sep; 53(5):1117-22. PubMed ID: 18637870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The sensitivity and specificity of the RSID-saliva kit for the detection of human salivary amylase in the Forensic Science Laboratory, Dublin, Ireland.
Casey DG; Price J
Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Jan; 194(1-3):67-71. PubMed ID: 19931992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative performance of the Phadebas® Forensic Press Test at room temperature and 37 °C for the detection of saliva stains on fabric exhibits.
Woodford H; Mitchell N; Henry J
Sci Justice; 2021 Mar; 61(2):170-174. PubMed ID: 33736849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Applicability of ELISA detection of statherin for forensic identification of saliva.
Akutsu T; Watanabe K; Fujinami Y; Sakurada K
Int J Legal Med; 2010 Sep; 124(5):493-8. PubMed ID: 19953261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acid phosphatase test on Phadebas
Herman Y; Feine I; Gafny R
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():218-222. PubMed ID: 29775922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Forensic identification of urine using the DMAC test: a method validation study.
Ong SY; Wain A; Groombridge L; Grimes E
Sci Justice; 2012 Jun; 52(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 22583500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification and detection of protein markers to differentiate between forensically relevant body fluids.
de Beijer RP; de Graaf C; van Weert A; van Leeuwen TG; Aalders MCG; van Dam A
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Sep; 290():196-206. PubMed ID: 30071450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of modern techniques for saliva screening.
Myers JR; Adkins WK
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):862-7. PubMed ID: 18503523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developmental validation of RSID-saliva: a lateral flow immunochromatographic strip test for the forensic detection of saliva.
Old JB; Schweers BA; Boonlayangoor PW; Reich KA
J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jul; 54(4):866-73. PubMed ID: 19486436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics as a tool to identify biological matrices in forensic science.
Van Steendam K; De Ceuleneer M; Dhaenens M; Van Hoofstat D; Deforce D
Int J Legal Med; 2013 Mar; 127(2):287-98. PubMed ID: 22843116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Developmental validation of the ParaDNA
Blackman S; Stafford-Allen B; Hanson EK; Panasiuk M; Brooker AL; Rendell P; Ballantyne J; Wells S
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():151-161. PubMed ID: 30176437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of Polilight in the detection of seminal fluid, saliva, and bloodstains and comparison with conventional chemical-based screening tests.
Vandenberg N; van Oorschot RA
J Forensic Sci; 2006 Mar; 51(2):361-70. PubMed ID: 16566772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of latex agglutination tests for fibrin-fibrinogen degradation products in the forensic identification of menstrual blood.
Akutsu T; Watanabe K; Motani H; Iwase H; Sakurada K
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2012 Jan; 14(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 22189168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Four Saliva Detection Methods to Identify Expectorated Blood Spatter.
Park HY; Son BN; Seo YI; Lim SK
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1571-6. PubMed ID: 26212779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comprehensive study into false positive rates for 'other' biological samples using common presumptive testing methods.
Stroud A; Gamblin A; Birchall P; Harbison S; Opperman S
Sci Justice; 2023 May; 63(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 37169467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of ABAcard(®) p30 and RSID™-Semen test kits for forensic semen identification.
Boward ES; Wilson SL
J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Nov; 20(8):1126-30. PubMed ID: 24237835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of amylase testing as a tool for saliva screening of crime scene trace swabs.
Hedman J; Dalin E; Rasmusson B; Ansell R
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jun; 5(3):194-8. PubMed ID: 20457099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identification of body fluid-specific DNA methylation markers for use in forensic science.
Park JL; Kwon OH; Kim JH; Yoo HS; Lee HC; Woo KM; Kim SY; Lee SH; Kim YS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():147-53. PubMed ID: 25128690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the effect of ozone disinfection on forensic identification of blood, saliva, and semen stains.
Fejes V; Simon G; Makszin L; Sipos K; Poor VS
Sci Justice; 2024 Mar; 64(2):151-158. PubMed ID: 38431372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
