These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29734407)

  • 1. Effect of developmental stage of embryos at freezing on live birth outcomes after frozen embryo transfer.
    Zhang XJ; Lv Q; Min LH; Cao XH; Li XJ
    Cryo Letters; 2017; 38(5):399-406. PubMed ID: 29734407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neonatal health including congenital malformation risk of 1072 children born after vitrified embryo transfer.
    Belva F; Bonduelle M; Roelants M; Verheyen G; Van Landuyt L
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1610-20. PubMed ID: 27165622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perinatal outcomes of singletons following vitrification versus slow-freezing of embryos: a multicenter cohort study using propensity score analysis.
    Gu F; Li S; Zheng L; Gu J; Li T; Du H; Gao C; Ding C; Quan S; Zhou C; Li P; Xu Y
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1788-1798. PubMed ID: 31407797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos.
    Liu SY; Teng B; Fu J; Li X; Zheng Y; Sun XX
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6.
    Ferreux L; Bourdon M; Sallem A; Santulli P; Barraud-Lange V; Le Foll N; Maignien C; Chapron C; de Ziegler D; Wolf JP; Pocate-Cheriet K
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 33(3):390-398. PubMed ID: 29394365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
    Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos.
    Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; De Vos A; Haentjens P; Blockeel C; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2943-9. PubMed ID: 24014599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development.
    Wirleitner B; Schuff M; Stecher A; Murtinger M; Vanderzwalmen P
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1685-95. PubMed ID: 27270972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Male gender explains increased birthweight in children born after transfer of blastocysts.
    Kaartinen NM; Kananen KM; Rodriguez-Wallberg KA; Tomás CM; Huhtala HS; Tinkanen HI
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2312-20. PubMed ID: 26253840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Birthweight of singletons born after cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer in fresh and warming cycles.
    De Vos A; Santos-Ribeiro S; Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 29206936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT.
    Debrock S; Peeraer K; Fernandez Gallardo E; De Neubourg D; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe TM
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1820-30. PubMed ID: 26089301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The freezing method of cleavage stage embryos has no impact on the weight of the newborns.
    Kaartinen N; Kananen K; Huhtala H; Keränen S; Tinkanen H
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Mar; 33(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 26749388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Outcome of embryo vitrification compared to slow freezing process at early cleavage stages. Report of the first French birth].
    Sifer C; Sermondade N; Dupont C; Poncelet C; Cédrin-Durnerin I; Hugues JN; Benzacken B; Levy R
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Mar; 40(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22154672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neonatal outcome after vitrified day 3 embryo transfers: a preliminary study.
    Rama Raju GA; Jaya Prakash G; Murali Krishna K; Madan K
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jul; 92(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 18692781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of frozen embryo transfer outcomes at blastocyst stage according to freezing method and type of endometrial preparation].
    Pouget O; Scalici E; Hoa-Ferrieres A; Deutsch-Bringer S; Gala A; Dechaud H; Hamamah S
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Mar; 43(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 25708846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perinatal outcomes after fresh versus vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: retrospective analysis.
    Ozgur K; Berkkanoglu M; Bulut H; Humaidan P; Coetzee K
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Oct; 104(4):899-907.e3. PubMed ID: 26211882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of embryo intactness and developmental potential following slow freezing and vitrification.
    Yu L; Jia C; Lan Y; Song R; Zhou L; Li Y; Liang Y; Wang S
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2017 Oct; 63(5):285-293. PubMed ID: 28795845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Slow freezing should not be totally substituted by vitrification when applied to day 3 embryo cryopreservation: an analysis of 5613 frozen cycles.
    Zhu HY; Xue YM; Yang LY; Jiang LY; Ling C; Tong XM; Zhang SY
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Sep; 32(9):1371-7. PubMed ID: 26238389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of the type of embryo culture medium on neonatal birthweight after single embryo transfer in IVF.
    Vergouw CG; Kostelijk EH; Doejaaren E; Hompes PG; Lambalk CB; Schats R
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Sep; 27(9):2619-26. PubMed ID: 22791752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The risk of birth defects among children born after vitrified blastocyst transfers and those born after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage embryo transfers.
    Zhu Q; Wang N; Wang B; Wang Y; Kuang Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Oct; 298(4):833-840. PubMed ID: 30135993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.