These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29735101)

  • 41. Consumer Perception of Sustainability Attributes in Organic and Local Food.
    Annunziata A; Mariani A
    Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric; 2018; 9(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 29299996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Nutrition and health claims as marketing tools.
    van Buul VJ; Brouns FJ
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2015; 55(11):1552-60. PubMed ID: 24364816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The impact of front-of-pack marketing attributes versus nutrition and health information on parents' food choices.
    Georgina Russell C; Burke PF; Waller DS; Wei E
    Appetite; 2017 Sep; 116():323-338. PubMed ID: 28479408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Neurophysiological tools to investigate consumer's gender differences during the observation of TV commercials.
    Vecchiato G; Maglione AG; Cherubino P; Wasikowska B; Wawrzyniak A; Latuszynska A; Latuszynska M; Nermend K; Graziani I; Leucci MR; Trettel A; Babiloni F
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():912981. PubMed ID: 25147579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Influence of time orientation on food choice: Case study with cookie labels.
    Tórtora G; Ares G
    Food Res Int; 2018 Apr; 106():706-711. PubMed ID: 29579977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Sensory characteristics and cross-cultural consumer acceptability of Bulgogi (Korean traditional barbecued beef).
    Hong JH; Yoon EK; Chung SJ; Chung L; Cha SM; O'Mahony M; Vickers Z; Kim KO
    J Food Sci; 2011; 76(5):S306-13. PubMed ID: 22417445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. How does consumer knowledge affect environmentally sustainable choices? Evidence from a cross-country latent class analysis of food labels.
    Peschel AO; Grebitus C; Steiner B; Veeman M
    Appetite; 2016 Nov; 106():78-91. PubMed ID: 26944229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Increasing consumers' attention capture and food choice through bottom-up effects.
    Peschel AO; Orquin JL; Mueller Loose S
    Appetite; 2019 Jan; 132():1-7. PubMed ID: 30248439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Novel Food-Based Product Communication: A Neurophysiological Study.
    Russo V; Songa G; Milani Marin LE; Balzaretti CM; Tedesco DEA
    Nutrients; 2020 Jul; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 32679684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Does the Valuation of Nutritional Claims Differ among Consumers? Insights from Spain.
    Jurado F; Gracia A
    Nutrients; 2017 Feb; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 28208811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effect of health/hedonic claims on consumer hedonic and sensory perception of sugar reduction: Case study with orange/passionfruit nectars.
    Oliveira D; Ares G; Deliza R
    Food Res Int; 2018 Jun; 108():111-118. PubMed ID: 29735039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Consumer attitudes and the governance of food safety.
    Todt O; Muñoz E; González M; Ponce G; Estévez B
    Public Underst Sci; 2009 Jan; 18(1):103-14. PubMed ID: 19579538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Does front-of-pack nutrition information improve consumer ability to make healthful choices? Performance of warnings and the traffic light system in a simulated shopping experiment.
    Machín L; Aschemann-Witzel J; Curutchet MR; Giménez A; Ares G
    Appetite; 2018 Feb; 121():55-62. PubMed ID: 29102533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Bibliometric-Based Evaluation of the Neuromarketing Research Trend: 2010-2021.
    Zhu Z; Jin Y; Su Y; Jia K; Lin CL; Liu X
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():872468. PubMed ID: 35983212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Measuring salient food attitudes and food-related values. An elaborated, conflicting and interdependent system.
    Hauser M; Jonas K; Riemann R
    Appetite; 2011 Oct; 57(2):329-38. PubMed ID: 21663779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Nutrient Content Claims: How They Impact Perceived Healthfulness of Fortified Snack Foods and the Moderating Effects of Nutrition Facts Labels.
    Iles IA; Nan X; Verrill L
    Health Commun; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1308-1316. PubMed ID: 28820611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Nutritional information and health warnings on wine labels: Exploring consumer interest and preferences.
    Annunziata A; Pomarici E; Vecchio R; Mariani A
    Appetite; 2016 Nov; 106():58-69. PubMed ID: 26939529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Looking is buying. How visual attention and choice are affected by consumer preferences and properties of the supermarket shelf.
    Gidlöf K; Anikin A; Lingonblad M; Wallin A
    Appetite; 2017 Sep; 116():29-38. PubMed ID: 28433775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Consumer Neuroscience: Attentional Preferences for Wine Labeling Reflected in the Posterior Contralateral Negativity.
    Alvino L; Constantinides E; van der Lubbe RHJ
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():688713. PubMed ID: 34721140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Unlocking the Subconscious Consumer Bias: A Survey on the Past, Present, and Future of Hybrid EEG Schemes in Neuromarketing.
    Kalaganis FP; Georgiadis K; Oikonomou VP; Laskaris NA; Nikolopoulos S; Kompatsiaris I
    Front Neuroergon; 2021; 2():672982. PubMed ID: 38235255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.