BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29736104)

  • 1. Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of the Waterlow Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale.
    Charalambous C; Koulori A; Vasilopoulos A; Roupa Z
    Med Arch; 2018 Apr; 72(2):141-144. PubMed ID: 29736104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of the Waterlow pressure ulcer risk-assessment tool.
    Thompson D
    Br J Nurs; 2005 Apr 28-May 11; 14(8):455-9. PubMed ID: 15924028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Waterlow pressure sore risk scale: a systematic review.
    Kottner J; Dassen T; Tannen A
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Mar; 46(3):369-79. PubMed ID: 18986650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care: comparison of inter-rater reliability of the COMHON (Conscious level, Mobility, Haemodynamics, Oxygenation, Nutrition) Index with three scales.
    Fulbrook P; Anderson A
    J Adv Nurs; 2016 Mar; 72(3):680-92. PubMed ID: 26462998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter-rater reliability of three most commonly used pressure ulcer risk assessment scales in clinical practice.
    Wang LH; Chen HL; Yan HY; Gao JH; Wang F; Ming Y; Lu L; Ding JJ
    Int Wound J; 2015 Oct; 12(5):590-4. PubMed ID: 25224688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and reliability of the Waterlow scale for assessing pressure injury risk in critical adult patients: A multi-centre cohort study.
    Han L; Guo J; Zhang H; Lv L; Dong J; Zhang T; Yan F; Ma Y
    J Clin Nurs; 2024 May; 33(5):1875-1883. PubMed ID: 38205587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive validity of Waterlow Scale for pressure ulcer development risk in hospitalized patients.
    Serpa LF; de Gouveia Santos VL; Gomboski G; Rosado SM
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2009; 36(6):640-6. PubMed ID: 19920745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pressure injuries in surgical patients: a comparison of Norton, Braden and Waterlow risk assessment scales.
    Gurkan A; Kirtil I; Aydin YD; Kutuk G
    J Wound Care; 2022 Feb; 31(2):170-177. PubMed ID: 35148625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the predictive validity of the Braden and Waterlow scales in intensive care unit patients: A multicentre study.
    Tao H; Zhang H; Ma Y; Lv L; Pei J; Jiao Y; Han L
    J Clin Nurs; 2024 May; 33(5):1809-1819. PubMed ID: 38031387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter-rater reliability and Waterlow's pressure ulcer risk assessment tool.
    Kelly J
    Nurs Stand; 2005 Apr 20-26; 19(32):86-7, 90-2. PubMed ID: 15875591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive validity of the Braden Scale, Norton Scale, and Waterlow Scale in the Czech Republic.
    Šateková L; Žiaková K; Zeleníková R
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 27874258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating the reliability and validity of the waterlow risk assessment scale: a literature review.
    Walsh B; Dempsey L
    Clin Nurs Res; 2011 May; 20(2):197-208. PubMed ID: 21078891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Validity of the Waterlow scale for pressure ulcer risk assessment in the intensive care unit: a prospective analysis of 698 patients].
    Compton F; Strauss M; Hortig T; Frey J; Hoffmann F; Zidek W; Schäfer JH
    Pflege; 2008 Feb; 21(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 18478685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting pressure ulcer risk: comparing the predictive validity of 4 scales.
    Jalali R; Rezaie M
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2005 Mar; 18(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 15788914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive Validity of Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Tools for Elderly: A Meta-Analysis.
    Park SH; Lee YS; Kwon YM
    West J Nurs Res; 2016 Apr; 38(4):459-83. PubMed ID: 26337859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of three commonly used pressure ulcer risk assessment scales.
    O'Tuathail C; Taqi R
    Br J Nurs; 2011 Mar 24-Apr 14; 20(6):S27-8, S30, S32 Passim. PubMed ID: 21471902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing Norton, Braden and Waterlow risk assessment scales for pressure ulcers in spinal cord injuries.
    Wellard S; Lo SK
    Contemp Nurse; 2000 Jun; 9(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 11855004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers.
    Moore ZE; Cowman S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Feb; (2):CD006471. PubMed ID: 24497383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity of the Waterlow scale and risk of pressure injury in acute care.
    Webster J; Gavin N; Nicholas C; Coleman K; Gardner G
    Br J Nurs; 2010 Mar 25-Apr 7; 19(6):S14, S16, S18 passim. PubMed ID: 20335924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.