BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29736429)

  • 1. Cross-modal cueing effects of visuospatial attention on conscious somatosensory perception.
    Doruk D; Chanes L; Malavera A; Merabet LB; Valero-Cabré A; Fregni F
    Heliyon; 2018 Apr; 4(4):e00595. PubMed ID: 29736429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orienting of attention with and without cue awareness.
    Herreros L; Lambert AJ; Chica AB
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():165-171. PubMed ID: 28284987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Valid cues for auditory or somatosensory targets affect their perception: a signal detection approach.
    Van Hulle L; Van Damme S; Crombez G
    Perception; 2013; 42(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 23700960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensory and decisional components of endogenous attention are dissociable.
    Banerjee S; Grover S; Ganesh S; Sridharan D
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Oct; 122(4):1538-1554. PubMed ID: 31268805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional reorienting triggers spatial asymmetries in a search task with cross-modal spatial cueing.
    Paladini RE; Diana L; Zito GA; Nyffeler T; Wyss P; Mosimann UP; Müri RM; Nef T; Cazzoli D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190677. PubMed ID: 29293637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The cost of attentional reorienting on conscious visual perception: an MEG study.
    Spagna A; Bayle DJ; Romeo Z; Seidel-Malkinson T; Liu J; Yahia-Cherif L; Chica AB; Bartolomeo P
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 Feb; 33(5):2048-2060. PubMed ID: 35609335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How efficient is the orienting of spatial attention to pain? An experimental investigation.
    Van Damme S; Legrain V
    Pain; 2012 Jun; 153(6):1226-1231. PubMed ID: 22480802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bias corrected double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: unmasked stimuli with non-predictive and semi-predictive cues.
    Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():213-25. PubMed ID: 25130410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Occipital-parietal interactions during shifts of exogenous visuospatial attention: trial-dependent changes of effective connectivity.
    Indovina I; Macaluso E
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1477-86. PubMed ID: 15707797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of cross-modal manipulations of attention on the ability of human subjects to discriminate changes in texture.
    Zompa IC; Chapman CE
    Somatosens Mot Res; 1995; 12(2):87-102. PubMed ID: 7502607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions in humans: dissociating detection and spatial discrimination.
    Sperdin HF; Cappe C; Murray MM
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Nov; 48(13):3696-705. PubMed ID: 20833194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two Oscillatory Correlates of Attention Control in the Alpha-Band with Distinct Consequences on Perceptual Gain and Metacognition.
    Trajkovic J; Di Gregorio F; Avenanti A; Thut G; Romei V
    J Neurosci; 2023 May; 43(19):3548-3556. PubMed ID: 37019621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rethinking human visual attention: spatial cueing effects and optimality of decisions by honeybees, monkeys and humans.
    Eckstein MP; Mack SC; Liston DB; Bogush L; Menzel R; Krauzlis RJ
    Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 85():5-19. PubMed ID: 23298793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Virtual Reality-Based Multimodal Audio-Tactile Cueing in Patients With Spatial Attention Deficits: Pilot Usability Study.
    Knobel SEJ; Kaufmann BC; Geiser N; Gerber SM; Müri RM; Nef T; Nyffeler T; Cazzoli D
    JMIR Serious Games; 2022 May; 10(2):e34884. PubMed ID: 35612894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrospective auditory cues can improve detection of near-threshold visual targets.
    Rimsky-Robert D; Störmer V; Sackur J; Sergent C
    Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):18966. PubMed ID: 31831788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visuospatial information processing load and the ratio between parietal cue and target P3 amplitudes in the Attentional Network Test.
    Abramov DM; Pontes M; Pontes AT; Mourao-Junior CA; Vieira J; Quero Cunha C; Tamborino T; Galhanone PR; deAzevedo LC; Lazarev VV
    Neurosci Lett; 2017 Apr; 647():91-96. PubMed ID: 28336341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in visuospatial attention over the adult lifespan.
    Greenwood PM; Parasuraman R; Haxby JV
    Neuropsychologia; 1993 May; 31(5):471-85. PubMed ID: 8502379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of a cross-modal manipulation of attention on somatosensory cortical neuronal responses to tactile stimuli in the monkey.
    Meftah el-M; Shenasa J; Chapman CE
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Dec; 88(6):3133-49. PubMed ID: 12466436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.
    Blurton SP; Greenlee MW; Gondan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2356-76. PubMed ID: 26001381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.