These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29736560)

  • 1. Click-Evoked Auditory Efferent Activity: Rate and Level Effects.
    Boothalingam S; Kurke J; Dhar S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Aug; 19(4):421-434. PubMed ID: 29736560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The MOC reflex during active listening to speech.
    Garinis AC; Glattke T; Cone BK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 54(5):1464-76. PubMed ID: 21862678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex inhibition of human cochlear nerve responses.
    Lichtenhan JT; Wilson US; Hancock KE; Guinan JJ
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():216-224. PubMed ID: 26364824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repeatability of click-evoked otoacoustic emission-based medial olivocochlear efferent assay.
    Mishra SK; Lutman ME
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 23739244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.
    Veuillet E; Collet L; Duclaux R
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 65(3):724-35. PubMed ID: 2051201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnitude of medial olivocochlear reflex assayed by tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions: reliability and comparison with click-evoked emissions.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Pastucha M; Skarzynski H; Kochanek K
    Int J Audiol; 2024 May; 63(5):293-299. PubMed ID: 37129585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The medial olivocochlear reflex in children during active listening.
    Smith SB; Cone B
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Aug; 54(8):518-23. PubMed ID: 25735203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans: intensity effects.
    Hood LJ; Berlin CI; Hurley A; Cecola RP; Bell B
    Hear Res; 1996 Nov; 101(1-2):113-8. PubMed ID: 8951438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of the stimulus presentation rate on medial olivocochlear system assays.
    Boothalingam S; Purcell DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):724-32. PubMed ID: 25698007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs.
    Guinan JJ; Backus BC; Lilaonitkul W; Aharonson V
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2003 Dec; 4(4):521-40. PubMed ID: 12799992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Büki B; Wit HP; Avan P
    Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Contralateral modification of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions].
    Ganz M; von Specht H; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 May; 76(5):278-83. PubMed ID: 9280414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Time-Course-Based Estimation of the Human Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Function Using Clicks.
    Boothalingam S; Goodman SS; MacCrae H; Dhar S
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():746821. PubMed ID: 34776849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic stimulation of human medial olivocochlear efferents reduces stimulus-frequency and click-evoked otoacoustic emission delays: Implications for cochlear filter bandwidths.
    Francis NA; Guinan JJ
    Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 267(1-2):36-45. PubMed ID: 20430088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal suppression and augmentation of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Verhulst S; Harte JM; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 246(1-2):23-35. PubMed ID: 18926894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time-frequency decomposition of click evoked otoacoustic emissions in children.
    Mishra SK; Biswal M
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():161-178. PubMed ID: 26976693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal suppression of the click-evoked otoacoustic emission level-curve.
    Verhulst S; Harte JM; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1452-63. PubMed ID: 21428509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased medial olivocochlear reflex strength in normal-hearing, noise-exposed humans.
    Bhatt I
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184036. PubMed ID: 28886123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term stability between click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs: A comparison.
    Hoshino M; Ueda H; Nakata S
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1999; 61(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 10450050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192930. PubMed ID: 29451905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.