These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29736680)

  • 1. Same-gender distractors are not so easy to reject: ERP evidence of gender categorization.
    Rakić T; Steffens MC; Wiese H
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 18(5):825-836. PubMed ID: 29736680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What drives social in-group biases in face recognition memory? ERP evidence from the own-gender bias.
    Wolff N; Kemter K; Schweinberger SR; Wiese H
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 May; 9(5):580-90. PubMed ID: 23474824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Following the time course of face gender and expression processing: a task-dependent ERP study.
    Valdés-Conroy B; Aguado L; Fernández-Cahill M; Romero-Ferreiro V; Diéguez-Risco T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 May; 92(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 24594443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The time course from gender categorization to gender-stereotype activation.
    Zhang X; Li Q; Sun S; Zuo B
    Soc Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 13(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 27778758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological correlates of age and gender perception on human faces.
    Mouchetant-Rostaing Y; Giard MH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):900-10. PubMed ID: 14511542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gender identity relevance predicts preferential neural processing of same-gendered faces.
    Domen I; Derks B; Van Veelen R; Scheepers D
    Soc Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 15(3):334-347. PubMed ID: 31913087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between visual search and categorization of own- and other-age faces.
    Craig BM; Lipp OV
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Nov; 109(4):736-757. PubMed ID: 29536506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceiving age and gender in unfamiliar faces: brain potential evidence for implicit and explicit person categorization.
    Wiese H; Schweinberger SR; Neumann MF
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Nov; 45(6):957-69. PubMed ID: 18823419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrative processing of invariant aspects of faces: effect of gender and race processing on identity analysis.
    Zhao M; Hayward WG
    J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 23308023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological evidence of low salience distractor interference during visual search.
    Fortier-Gauthier U; Jolicœur P
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13068. PubMed ID: 29423999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional processing of multiple targets and distractors.
    Munneke J; Fait E; Mazza V
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1104-8. PubMed ID: 23902254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The activation of visual memory for facial identity is task-dependent: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2014 May; 54():124-34. PubMed ID: 24657481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural evidence that inhibition is linked to the affective devaluation of distractors that match the contents of working memory.
    De Vito D; Al-Aidroos N; Fenske MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():259-269. PubMed ID: 28341131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Race and gender on the brain: electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals.
    Ito TA; Urland GR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Oct; 85(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 14561116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. N250r and N400 ERP correlates of immediate famous face repetition are independent of perceptual load.
    Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1239():181-90. PubMed ID: 18793621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional bias to affective faces and complex IAPS images in early visual cortex follows emotional cue extraction.
    Bekhtereva V; Craddock M; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 112():254-266. PubMed ID: 25818682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Similar distraction, but differential suppression, for faces and non-face objects: Evidence from behaviour and event-related potentials.
    Neumann MF; Viska CG; van Huis S; Palermo R
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Nov; 139():39-46. PubMed ID: 30292783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implicit and explicit categorization of natural scenes.
    Codispoti M; Ferrari V; De Cesarei A; Cardinale R
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 156():53-65. PubMed ID: 17015074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.