These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29738167)
1. [A novel disposable circumcision device versus conventional surgery in the treatment of redundant prepuce and phimosis]. Zhao YJ; Zhan PC; Chen Q; Cheng W; Ye FZ; Wang YS; Wang JJ; Li JH; Tang ZM Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2017 Nov; 23(11):1007-1013. PubMed ID: 29738167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A novel disposable ring versus the suture device in circumcision]. Zhao YJ; Zhan PC; Chen Q; Cheng W; Ye FZ; Wang YS; Wang JJ; Tang ZM Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2017 Dec; 23(12):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 29738180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Shang Ring versus disposable circumcision suture device in the treatment of phimosis or redundant prepuce]. Wang SX; Zhang ZB; Yang SF; Yang EM; Pan DS; Xie XQ; Lin XH; Yang MY Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2016 Jun; 22(6):534-537. PubMed ID: 28963844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Shang Ring scissor circumcision versus electrotome circumcision for redundant prepuce]. Tang XH; Zhang P; Ding H; Zhao JH; Tang LL; Fang Q Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2016 Oct; 22(10):877-881. PubMed ID: 29278467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical effect of circumcision stapler in the treatment of phimosis and redundant prepuce]. Huo ZC; Liu G; Wang W; He DG; Yu H; Fan WJ; Zhong Z Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2015 Apr; 21(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 26027100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Surgical plane positioning with a disposable circumcision suture device for the treatment of phimosis and redundant prepuce]. Han YF; Jiang HS; Wang JL; Chong W; Chen H; Xu ZP; Chen Y Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2018 May; 24(5):404-408. PubMed ID: 30171754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A comparative study of three different circumcision devices for redundant prepuce and phimosis]. Zhang M; Wei LJ Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2021 Aug; 27(8):729-732. PubMed ID: 34914246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Shang Ring circumcision by transverse incision in the distal penis foreskin and pull-up of the interior board for short frenulum praeputii]. Liu C; Liu XJ; Mu JG; Liu D; Ren YS; Zhang CL Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 20(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 24873159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative efficacy and safety of different circumcisions for patients with redundant prepuce or phimosis: A network meta-analysis. Huang C; Song P; Xu C; Wang R; Wei L; Zhao X Int J Surg; 2017 Jul; 43():17-25. PubMed ID: 28522221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of a novel disposable suture device in circumcision: a prospective non-randomized controlled study. Zhang Z; Yang B; Yu W; Han Y; Xu Z; Chen H; Chen Y; Dai Y Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Apr; 48(4):465-73. PubMed ID: 26797875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical application of the disposable circumcision suture device in male circumcision]. Li S; Zhang L; Wang DW; Yang S; Mu HQ; Nan CJ; Wu TL; Zhu SJ; Chen YH Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Sep; 20(9):816-9. PubMed ID: 25306810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Outward versus inward placement in Shang Ring circumcision for phimosis and redundant prepuce in adult men: analysis of 527 cases]. Xie ST; Chen GY; Wei QH; Liu XT; Jiao L; Tang Y Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 20(4):325-8. PubMed ID: 24873158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative analysis on the outcomes in circumcising children using modified Chinese ShangRing and conventional surgical circumcision. Zhang Q; Gao L; Liu D; Song G; Gao P; Zhang S; Zhang J; Xu Y; Han D; Xu Y Pediatr Surg Int; 2022 Dec; 39(1):59. PubMed ID: 36550318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Modified circumcision with a disposable suture device]. Ren Y; Yan JJ Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2015 Jun; 21(6):541-4. PubMed ID: 26242046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Shang Ring, sleeve and conventional circumcisions for redundant prepuce and phimosis: A comparative study of 918 cases]. Wang R; Chen WJ; Shi WH; Xue YF Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Apr; 19(4):332-6. PubMed ID: 23678713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of the disposable circumcision stapler, disposable prepuce ligator and traditional surgical method in circumcision]. Peng L; Han YF; Chen D; Lai B; Huang HC Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2020 Dec; 26(12):1101-1104. PubMed ID: 34898085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of a disposable circumcision suture device versus conventional circumcision: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Huo ZC; Liu G; Li XY; Liu F; Fan WJ; Guan RH; Li PF; Mo DY; He YZ Asian J Androl; 2017; 19(3):362-367. PubMed ID: 26975486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Frenulum identification positioning with a disposable suture device in circumcision to prevent postoperative penile frenulum malposition]. Huang YQ; Zheng J; Zhou XX; Yao ZM; Zhang T; Shao QF; Wu ZG Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2017 May; 23(5):422-426. PubMed ID: 29717832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical effects of the circumcision stapler, foreskin cerclage, and traditional circumcision: A comparative study]. Miao HD; Lu JW; Lu FN; Shen F; Yuan XL; Liu HY Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2015 Apr; 21(4):334-7. PubMed ID: 26027101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Shang Ring circumcision versus conventional circumcision for redundant prepuce or phimosis: a meta analysis]. Xiao EL; Ding H; Li YQ; Wang ZP Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Oct; 19(10):935-9. PubMed ID: 24218951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]