These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29738603)

  • 1. A powerful approach to the study of moderate effect modification in observational studies.
    Lee K; Small DS; Rosenbaum PR
    Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1161-1170. PubMed ID: 29738603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An exact test with high power and robustness to unmeasured confounding effects.
    Shauly-Aharonov M
    Stat Med; 2020 Apr; 39(8):1041-1053. PubMed ID: 31907979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A statistic with demonstrated insensitivity to unmeasured bias for 2 × 2 × S tables in observational studies.
    Rosenbaum PR
    Stat Med; 2022 Aug; 41(19):3758-3771. PubMed ID: 35607846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian nonparametric generative models for causal inference with missing at random covariates.
    Roy J; Lum KJ; Zeldow B; Dworkin JD; Re VL; Daniels MJ
    Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1193-1202. PubMed ID: 29579341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Model assisted sensitivity analyses for hidden bias with binary outcomes.
    Nattino G; Lu B
    Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1141-1149. PubMed ID: 29992547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of methods to estimate the survivor average causal effect in the presence of missing data: a simulation study.
    McGuinness MB; Kasza J; Karahalios A; Guymer RH; Finger RP; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):223. PubMed ID: 31795945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing causal treatment effect estimation when using large observational datasets.
    John ER; Abrams KR; Brightling CE; Sheehan NA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):207. PubMed ID: 31726969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing causal effects in observational survival data using propensity score matching design.
    Lu B; Cai D; Tong X
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(11):1846-1858. PubMed ID: 29399833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Instrumental variable methods for causal inference.
    Baiocchi M; Cheng J; Small DS
    Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(13):2297-340. PubMed ID: 24599889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Sensitivity analysis method for unmeasured confounding interference in observational study].
    Wang DH; You DF; Huang LL; Zhao Y
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 40(11):1470-1475. PubMed ID: 31838823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Doubly robust matching estimators for high dimensional confounding adjustment.
    Antonelli J; Cefalu M; Palmer N; Agniel D
    Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1171-1179. PubMed ID: 29750844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.
    Schuler MS; Rose S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 185(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 27941068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of Bayesian and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding.
    McCandless LC; Gustafson P
    Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(18):2887-2901. PubMed ID: 28386994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accounting for Confounding in Observational Studies.
    D'Onofrio BM; Sjölander A; Lahey BB; Lichtenstein P; Öberg AS
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2020 May; 16():25-48. PubMed ID: 32384000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accounting for uncertainty in confounder and effect modifier selection when estimating average causal effects in generalized linear models.
    Wang C; Dominici F; Parmigiani G; Zigler CM
    Biometrics; 2015 Sep; 71(3):654-65. PubMed ID: 25899155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new u-statistic with superior design sensitivity in matched observational studies.
    Rosenbaum PR
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):1017-27. PubMed ID: 21175557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An adaptive Mantel-Haenszel test for sensitivity analysis in observational studies.
    Rosenbaum PR; Small DS
    Biometrics; 2017 Jun; 73(2):422-430. PubMed ID: 27704529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Causal inference accounting for unobserved confounding after outcome regression and doubly robust estimation.
    Genbäck M; de Luna X
    Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):506-515. PubMed ID: 30430543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs.
    Colditz GA
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2010; 50 Suppl 1(s1):10-2. PubMed ID: 21132580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.