These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29738757)

  • 1. Centralizing Esophagectomy to Improve Outcomes and Enhance Clinical Research: Invited Expert Review.
    Chang AC
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2018 Sep; 106(3):916-923. PubMed ID: 29738757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Traveling to a High-volume Center is Associated With Improved Survival for Patients With Esophageal Cancer.
    Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Wang X; Hartwig MG; D'Amico TA; Berry MF
    Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):743-749. PubMed ID: 28266965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Volume- or outcome-based referral to improve quality of care for esophageal cancer surgery in The Netherlands.
    Wouters MW; Krijnen P; Le Cessie S; Gooiker GA; Guicherit OR; Marinelli AW; Kievit J; Tollenaar RA
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):481-7. PubMed ID: 19466737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation.
    Merkow RP; Bilimoria KY; McCarter MD; Phillips JD; DeCamp MM; Sherman KL; Ko CY; Bentrem DJ
    Arch Surg; 2012 Nov; 147(11):1009-16. PubMed ID: 23165615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is It Time to Centralize High-risk Cancer Care in the United States? Comparison of Outcomes of Esophagectomy Between England and the United States.
    Munasinghe A; Markar SR; Mamidanna R; Darzi AW; Faiz OD; Hanna GB; Low DE
    Ann Surg; 2015 Jul; 262(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 24979602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of partial versus total esophagectomy in the United States.
    Jafari MD; Halabi WJ; Smith BR; Nguyen VQ; Phelan MJ; Stamos MJ; Nguyen NT
    Ann Surg; 2013 Sep; 258(3):450-8. PubMed ID: 24022437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Better survival in patients with esophageal cancer after surgical treatment in university hospitals: a plea for performance by surgical oncologists.
    Verhoef C; van de Weyer R; Schaapveld M; Bastiaannet E; Plukker JT
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 14(5):1678-87. PubMed ID: 17294070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Volume-outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000-2011.
    Markar SR; Karthikesalingam A; Thrumurthy S; Low DE
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 May; 16(5):1055-63. PubMed ID: 22089950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.
    Fuchs HF; Harnsberger CR; Broderick RC; Chang DC; Sandler BJ; Jacobsen GR; Bouvet M; Horgan S
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jun; 31(6):2491-2497. PubMed ID: 27660245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality Improvement in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Outcome Improvement Through Data Review.
    Lorimer PD; Motz BM; Boselli DM; Reames MK; Hill JS; Salo JC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jan; 26(1):177-187. PubMed ID: 30382434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Esophagectomy outcomes at low-volume hospitals: the association between systems characteristics and mortality.
    Funk LM; Gawande AA; Semel ME; Lipsitz SR; Berry WR; Zinner MJ; Jha AK
    Ann Surg; 2011 May; 253(5):912-7. PubMed ID: 21422913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hospital esophageal cancer resection volume does not predict patient mortality risk.
    Kozower BD; Stukenborg GJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 May; 93(5):1690-6; discussion 1696-8. PubMed ID: 22541199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic Transthoracic Esophagectomy in High-Volume Centers: Improving Outcome and Extending Indications.
    van Hillegersberg R
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Aug; 66(5):360-361. PubMed ID: 30092602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Esophagectomy for cancer: clinical concerns support centralizing operations within the larger hospitals.
    Fujita H; Ozawa S; Kuwano H; Ueda Y; Hattori S; Yanagawa T;
    Dis Esophagus; 2010 Feb; 23(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 19515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The dilemma of T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma.
    Molena D; DeMeester SR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 May; 153(5):1206-1207. PubMed ID: 28314532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Centralization of esophagectomy: how far should we go?
    Henneman D; Dikken JL; Putter H; Lemmens VE; Van der Geest LG; van Hillegersberg R; Verheij M; van de Velde CJ; Wouters MW
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Dec; 21(13):4068-74. PubMed ID: 25005073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The volume-performance relationship in esophagectomy.
    Chang AC; Birkmeyer JD
    Thorac Surg Clin; 2006 Feb; 16(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 16696286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Centralization of esophageal cancer surgery: does it improve clinical outcome?
    Wouters MW; Karim-Kos HE; le Cessie S; Wijnhoven BP; Stassen LP; Steup WH; Tilanus HW; Tollenaar RA
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):1789-98. PubMed ID: 19370377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regionalization of care: centralizing complex surgical procedures.
    Hollenbeck BK; Miller DC; Wei JT; Montie JE
    Nat Clin Pract Urol; 2005 Oct; 2(10):461. PubMed ID: 16474601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England.
    Lazzarino AI; Nagpal K; Bottle A; Faiz O; Moorthy K; Aylin P
    Ann Surg; 2010 Aug; 252(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 20622666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.