These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29739262)

  • 1. Comparison of prostaglandin and mechanical cervical ripening in the setting of small for gestational age neonates.
    Rossi RM; Warshak CR; Masters HR; Regan JK; Kritzer SA; Magner KP
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3841-3846. PubMed ID: 29739262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association of Prostaglandin Use for Cervical Ripening with Mode of Delivery in Small for Gestational Age versus Non-Small for Gestational Age Neonates.
    Bridges AG; Allshouse AA; Canfield DR; Grover BW; Son SL; Einerson BD; Silver RM; Haas DM; Grobman WA; Simhan HN; Day RC; Blue NR
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e456-e464. PubMed ID: 35863371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transcervical Foley Balloon Plus Vaginal Misoprostol versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Obese Women: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.
    Viteri OA; Tabsh KK; Alrais MA; Salazar XC; Lopez JM; Fok RY; Chauhan SP; Sibai BM
    Am J Perinatol; 2021 Aug; 38(S 01):e123-e128. PubMed ID: 32299108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of misoprostol for cervical ripening.
    Katz VL; Farmer RM; Dean CA; Carpenter ME
    South Med J; 2000 Sep; 93(9):881-4. PubMed ID: 11005347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of obstetrical outcomes with labor induction agents used at term.
    Aghideh FK; Mullin PM; Ingles S; Ouzounian JG; Opper N; Wilson ML; Miller DA; Lee RH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Apr; 27(6):592-6. PubMed ID: 23919802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Labor Induction Outcomes with Outpatient Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening among Low-Risk Women.
    Kandahari N; Schneider AN; Tucker LS; Raine-Bennett TR; Mohta VJ
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e818-e826. PubMed ID: 36130669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
    Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Labor outcomes of obese patients undergoing induction of labor with misoprostol compared to dinoprostone.
    Suidan RS; Rondon KC; Apuzzio JJ; Williams SF
    Am J Perinatol; 2015 Feb; 30(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 24915563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by late fetal growth restriction undergoing induction of labor with dinoprostone compared with cervical balloon: A retrospective, international study.
    Di Mascio D; Villalain C; Rizzo G; Morales‐Rosello J; Sileo FG; Maruotti GM; Prefumo F; Galindo A; D'Antonio F;
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Jul; 100(7):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 33792924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does Induction with Misoprostol Impact the Small for Gestational Age Neonate?
    Foeller ME; Cruz MO; Kominiarek MA; Hibbard JU
    Am J Perinatol; 2015 Dec; 32(14):1311-7. PubMed ID: 26352682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour.
    Chen W; Xue J; Peprah MK; Wen SW; Walker M; Gao Y; Tang Y
    BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 26538408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety of misoprostol for near-term and term induction in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies compared to dinoprostone and primary cesarean section: results of a retrospective cohort study.
    Steetskamp J; Bachmann E; Hasenburg A; Battista MJ
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Dec; 302(6):1369-1374. PubMed ID: 32761274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adverse intrapartum outcome in pregnancies complicated by small for gestational age and late fetal growth restriction undergoing induction of labor with Dinoprostone, Misoprostol or mechanical methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Familiari A; Khalil A; Rizzo G; Odibo A; Vergani P; Buca D; Hidaka N; Di Mascio D; Nwabuobi C; Simeone S; Mecacci F; Visentin S; Cosmi E; Liberati M; D'Amico A; Flacco ME; Martellucci CA; Manzoli L; Nappi L; Iacovella C; Bahlmann F; Melchiorre K; Scambia G; Berghella V; D'Antonio F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Sep; 252():455-467. PubMed ID: 32738675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prostaglandin versus mechanical dilation and the effect of maternal obesity on failure to achieve active labor: a cohort study.
    Beckwith L; Magner K; Kritzer S; Warshak CR
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Jul; 30(13):1621-1626. PubMed ID: 27560557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of two different doses of misoprostol suppositories with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Khoury AN; Zhou QP; Gorenberg DM; Nies BM; Manley GE; Mecklenburg FE
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun; 10(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 11444788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of dinoprostone versus cook cervical ripening balloon on induction in pregnancies complicated by small-for-gestational-age fetuses at term.
    Yan M; Li L; Wang J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2024 Dec; 37(1):2381584. PubMed ID: 39034273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Misoprostol With Foley Bulb Compared With Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Al-Ibraheemi Z; Brustman L; Bimson BE; Porat N; Rosenn B
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 29215514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pregnancy outcomes after failed cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 followed by Foley balloon catheter.
    Mizrachi Y; Levy M; Weiner E; Bar J; Barda G; Kovo M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Oct; 29(19):3229-33. PubMed ID: 26572735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
    Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: a randomized trial of 3 techniques.
    Barrilleaux PS; Bofill JA; Terrone DA; Magann EF; May WL; Morrison JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 186(6):1124-9. PubMed ID: 12066084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.