BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29739463)

  • 41. Public Mistrust of the U.S. Health Care System's Profit Motives: Mixed-Methods Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Richmond J; Powell W; Maurer M; Mangrum R; Gold MR; Pathak-Sen E; Yang M; Carman KL
    J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Dec; 32(12):1396-1402. PubMed ID: 28875447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Public engagement in priority-setting: results from a pan-Canadian survey of decision-makers in cancer control.
    Regier DA; Bentley C; Mitton C; Bryan S; Burgess MM; Chesney E; Coldman A; Gibson J; Hoch J; Rahman S; Sabharwal M; Sawka C; Schuckel V; Peacock SJ
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Dec; 122():130-9. PubMed ID: 25441325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. European perspective on the costs and cost-effectiveness of cancer therapies.
    Drummond MF; Mason AR
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Jan; 25(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 17210939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Getting the cat back in the bag: reforming the way provinces manage drug expenditures to make them manageable.
    Levy AR; Gagnon YM
    Healthc Pap; 2002; 3(1):32-7; discussion 87-94. PubMed ID: 12811108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Centralized drug review processes: are they fair?
    Mitton CR; McMahon M; Morgan S; Gibson J
    Soc Sci Med; 2006 Jul; 63(1):200-11. PubMed ID: 16427728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Citizens' Perspectives on Disinvestment from Publicly Funded Pathology Tests: A Deliberative Forum.
    Street JM; Callaghan P; Braunack-Mayer AJ; Hiller JE
    Value Health; 2015 Dec; 18(8):1050-6. PubMed ID: 26686790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Seniors' prescription drug cost inflation and cost containment: evidence from British Columbia.
    Morgan SG; Agnew JD; Barer ML
    Health Policy; 2004 Jun; 68(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 15113641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluating reference-based pricing: initial findings and prospects.
    Narine L; Senathirajah M; Smith T
    CMAJ; 1999 Aug; 161(3):286-8. PubMed ID: 10463052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate.
    Secko DM; Preto N; Niemeyer S; Burgess MM
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(4):781-9. PubMed ID: 19095337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Can Severity Outweigh Smaller Numbers? A Deliberative Perspective from Canada.
    Magalhaes M
    Value Health; 2018 May; 21(5):532-537. PubMed ID: 29753349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Pricing and Paying for Cancer Drugs: Policy Options for Fixing A Broken System.
    Hyman DA; Silver C
    Cancer J; 2020; 26(4):298-303. PubMed ID: 32732672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Psychogeriatric care: building rural community capacity.
    Morrow MH; Hemingway D; Grant J; Jamer B
    Rural Remote Health; 2012; 12():1971. PubMed ID: 22650617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Priority setting in the provincial health services authority: survey of key decision makers.
    Teng F; Mitton C; Mackenzie J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 7():84. PubMed ID: 17565691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Continental Divide? The attitudes of US and Canadian oncologists on the costs, cost-effectiveness, and health policies associated with new cancer drugs.
    Berry SR; Bell CM; Ubel PA; Evans WK; Nadler E; Strevel EL; Neumann PJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Sep; 28(27):4149-53. PubMed ID: 20697077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Generic drug prices and policy in Australia: room for improvement? a comparative analysis with England.
    Mansfield SJ
    Aust Health Rev; 2014 Feb; 38(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 24480618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Bedside rationing by general practitioners: a postal survey in the Danish public healthcare system.
    Lauridsen SM; Norup M; Rossel P
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Sep; 8():192. PubMed ID: 18808694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Factors affecting engagement between academic faculty and decision-makers: learnings and priorities for a school of public health.
    Jessani NS; Siddiqi SM; Babcock C; Davey-Rothwell M; Ho S; Holtgrave DR
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Jul; 16(1):65. PubMed ID: 30045730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Health technology adoption and the politics of governance in the UK.
    Milewa T
    Soc Sci Med; 2006 Dec; 63(12):3102-12. PubMed ID: 16982120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. How do cost-effectiveness analyses inform reimbursement decisions for oncology medicines in Canada? The example of sunitinib for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
    Chabot I; Rocchi A
    Value Health; 2010; 13(6):837-45. PubMed ID: 20561332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The costs of change: direct medical costs of solid organ transplantation in British Columbia, Canada, 1995-2003.
    Levy AR; Sobolev B; James D; Barrable W; Clarke-Richardson P; Sullivan SD; Keown PA; Chung S; Straatman L; Levy RD
    Value Health; 2009; 12(2):282-92. PubMed ID: 18783395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.