These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29739767)
41. What has been the impact so far? Bellizzi JJ Med Times; 1974 Sep; 102(9):201-2 passim. PubMed ID: 4855414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Control of drugs and dependence. Bewley TH Med Leg J; 1969; 37(1):7-22. PubMed ID: 4886949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Drug effects, performativity and the law. Race K Int J Drug Policy; 2011 Nov; 22(6):410-2. PubMed ID: 22056290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. New drug law: The missing link in substance use and its control? Ming LC; Lee KS Res Social Adm Pharm; 2016; 12(6):1035-1037. PubMed ID: 27311382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Drug abuse related to prescribing practices. JAMA; 1982 Feb; 247(6):864-6. PubMed ID: 7057570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Restricting the sale of pseudoephedrine to prevent methamphetamine production. Colker AC NCSL Legisbrief; 2005 Feb; 13(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 15726724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Misuse of drugs act 1971. Cahal DA Br Med J; 1974 Jan; 1(5897):70-2. PubMed ID: 4855858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Forfeiture of the proceeds of drug trafficking. Nagler N Bull Narc; 1984; 36(4):21-30. PubMed ID: 6570696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Mental disorder and crime. Taylor PJ Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14(2 Suppl):S31-6. PubMed ID: 23570122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The Illinois experience in achieving the medical/regulatory balance required to control prescription drug diversion. Bishop MT; Vlasty RJ NIDA Res Monogr; 1993; 131():159-75. PubMed ID: 8413527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. [Drug abuse and legislators. Methods and possibilities of an optimal control of drug and pharmaceutical abuse]. von Wartburg WP Experientia Suppl; 1974; 21():1-474. PubMed ID: 4426361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Why the U.S. Government is not contributing to the resolution of the nation's drug problem. Chambliss WJ Int J Health Serv; 1994; 24(4):675-90. PubMed ID: 7896469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Socio-economic aspects of drug control and related United Nations action. Noll A Bull Narc; 1978; 30(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 248290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Change of heart perhaps, but not of legislation. Marwick C JAMA; 1994 Jun; 271(21):1635. PubMed ID: 8182822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Should drugs be decriminalised? Prohibition is an ideologically driven failure. Rolles SA BMJ; 2007 Nov; 335(7629):1060. PubMed ID: 18033892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The role of the federal government in the development of narcotic antagonists. Green AI Adv Biochem Psychopharmacol; 1973; 8(0):576-7. PubMed ID: 4795123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. [Physicians and the law of December 31, 1970 relative to prevention of drug addiction]. Doll PJ Presse Med (1893); 1971 Apr; 79(19):877-9. PubMed ID: 5576503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Recent changes in Danish law on drugs and drug offences. Jepsen J; Laursen L Eur Addict Res; 1998 Sep; 4(3):113-27. PubMed ID: 9742273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Counter-attack on cocaine trafficking: the strategy of drug law enforcement. Caffrey RJ Bull Narc; 1984; 36(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 6569822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Abuse to hypnotics. McKim TR Int Z Klin Pharmakol Ther Toxikol; 1968 Jul; 1(5):381-3. PubMed ID: 5750142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]