These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29741390)

  • 1. The independent statistician model: How well is it working?
    DeMets D
    Clin Trials; 2018 Aug; 15(4):329-334. PubMed ID: 29741390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to construct an optimal interim report: What the data monitoring committee does and doesn't need to know.
    Neaton JD; Grund B; Wentworth D
    Clin Trials; 2018 Aug; 15(4):359-365. PubMed ID: 29552920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recommendations for data monitoring committees from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative.
    Calis KA; Archdeacon P; Bain R; DeMets D; Donohue M; Elzarrad MK; Forrest A; McEachern J; Pencina MJ; Perlmutter J; Lewis RJ
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):342-348. PubMed ID: 28503947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding the functions and operations of data monitoring committees: Survey and focus group findings.
    Calis KA; Archdeacon P; Bain RP; Forrest A; Perlmutter J; DeMets DL
    Clin Trials; 2017 Feb; 14(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 27885056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should statisticians reporting to data monitoring committees be independent of the trial sponsor and leadership?
    Ellenberg SS; George SL
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(10):1503-5. PubMed ID: 15122727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The independent statistician for data monitoring committees.
    DeMets DL; Fleming TR
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(10):1513-7. PubMed ID: 15122729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A major trial needs three statisticians: why, how and who?
    Pocock SJ
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(10):1535-9. PubMed ID: 15122734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Data monitoring committees: Promoting best practices to address emerging challenges.
    Fleming TR; DeMets DL; Roe MT; Wittes J; Calis KA; Vora AN; Meisel A; Bain RP; Konstam MA; Pencina MJ; Gordon DJ; Mahaffey KW; Hennekens CH; Neaton JD; Pearson GD; Andersson TL; Pfeffer MA; Ellenberg SS
    Clin Trials; 2017 Apr; 14(2):115-123. PubMed ID: 28359194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Data monitoring committees for pragmatic clinical trials.
    Ellenberg SS; Culbertson R; Gillen DL; Goodman S; Schrandt S; Zirkle M
    Clin Trials; 2015 Oct; 12(5):530-6. PubMed ID: 26374679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Independence of the statistician who analyses unblinded data.
    Siegel JP; O'Neill RT; Temple R; Campbell G; Foulkes MA
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(10):1527-9. PubMed ID: 15122732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC).
    Wilhelmsen L
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(19):2823-9. PubMed ID: 12325098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Issues in regulatory guidelines for data monitoring committees.
    DeMets D; Califf R; Dixon D; Ellenberg S; Fleming T; Held P; Julian D; Kaplan R; Levine R; Neaton J; Packer M; Pocock S; Rockhold F; Seto B; Siegel J; Snapinn S; Stump D; Temple R; Whitley R
    Clin Trials; 2004; 1(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 16281888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What is the appropriate role of the trial statistician in preparing and presenting interim findings to an independent Data Monitoring Committee in the U.S. Cancer Cooperative Group setting?
    Bryant J
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(10):1507-11. PubMed ID: 15122728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regulatory perspectives on data monitoring.
    O'Neill RT
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(19):2831-42. PubMed ID: 12325099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Data and safety monitoring board deliberations resulting in the early termination of the Monoclonal Antibody Cytomegalovirus Retinitis Trial.
    Gilpin AM; Holbrook JT; Jabs DA; Meinert CL;
    Control Clin Trials; 2003 Feb; 24(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 12559647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A model for the interim analysis process: a case study.
    Delgado-Herrera L; Anbar D
    Control Clin Trials; 2003 Feb; 24(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 12559642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical issues arising when interim data in clinical trials is restricted to independent data monitoring committees.
    Wells RJ; Gartside PS; McHenry CL
    IRB; 2000 Jan; 22(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 12546010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Independent data monitoring committees: an update and overview.
    Sartor O; Halabi S
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 25631301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board in a clinical trial: the CRISIS study.
    Holubkov R; Casper TC; Dean JM; Anand KJ; Zimmerman J; Meert KL; Newth CJ; Berger J; Harrison R; Willson DF; Nicholson C;
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2013 May; 14(4):374-83. PubMed ID: 23392377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Playing safe and preserving integrity: making the FDA model work.
    Wittes J
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(10):1523-5. PubMed ID: 15122731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.