148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29742692)
1. Five common tumor biomarkers and CEA for diagnosing early gastric cancer: A protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
Shen M; Wang H; Wei K; Zhang J; You C
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 May; 97(19):e0577. PubMed ID: 29742692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of five common tumour biomarkers and CA19-9 for pancreatic cancer: a protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
Ge L; Pan B; Song F; Ma J; Zeraatkar D; Zhou J; Tian J
BMJ Open; 2017 Dec; 7(12):e018175. PubMed ID: 29282264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CT, MRI, and F-18 FDG PET for the detection of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
Zhang Y; Ni J; Wei K; Tian J; Sun S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Sep; 97(38):e12387. PubMed ID: 30235705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. F-18 FDG PET, CT, and MRI for detecting the malignant potential in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
Wei K; Pan B; Yang H; Lu C; Ge L; Cao N
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Apr; 97(16):e0389. PubMed ID: 29668594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic and prognostic value of CEA, CA19-9, AFP and CA125 for early gastric cancer.
Feng F; Tian Y; Xu G; Liu Z; Liu S; Zheng G; Guo M; Lian X; Fan D; Zhang H
BMC Cancer; 2017 Nov; 17(1):737. PubMed ID: 29121872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value of Combined Detection of Serum CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9, CA15-3 and CA12-5 in the Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer.
Chen C; Chen Q; Zhao Q; Liu M; Guo J
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2017 May; 47(3):260-263. PubMed ID: 28667025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of serum and gastric juice levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19.9 and CA72.4 in patients with gastric cancer.
Tocchi A; Costa G; Lepre L; Liotta G; Mazzoni G; Cianetti A; Vannini P
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 1998; 124(8):450-5. PubMed ID: 9750022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic performance of biomarkers for ovarian cancer: Protocol for an overview, evidence mapping, and adjusted indirect comparisons.
Hua J; Liu J; Hua M; Cai R; Li M; Wang J; Wang J;
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 May; 98(18):e15508. PubMed ID: 31045839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of Combined Detection of Serum CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9 and TSGF in the Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer.
Yin LK; Sun XQ; Mou DZ
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(9):3867-70. PubMed ID: 25987051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomarkers for detecting prostate cancer: Protocol for an umbrella review with integrated network meta-analysis.
Jia J; Sun Y; Ren J; Li M; Wang J; Li H;
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jul; 98(30):e16517. PubMed ID: 31348264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CA72-4 combined with CEA, CA125 and CAl9-9 improves the sensitivity for the early diagnosis of gastric cancer.
Yang AP; Liu J; Lei HY; Zhang QW; Zhao L; Yang GH
Clin Chim Acta; 2014 Nov; 437():183-6. PubMed ID: 25086284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical Evaluation of Serum Tumor Markers in the Diagnosis of Gastric Adenocarcinoma Staging and Grading.
Ghaderi B; Moghbel H; Daneshkhah N; Babahajian A; Sheikhesmaeili F
J Gastrointest Cancer; 2019 Sep; 50(3):525-529. PubMed ID: 29806060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical assessment and prognostic evaluation of tumor markers in patients with gastric cancer.
Jiexian J; Xiaoqin X; Lili D; Baoguo T; Ting S; Xianwen Z; Cunzhi H
Int J Biol Markers; 2013 Jun; 28(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 23787496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and validation of a serum microRNA biomarker panel for detecting gastric cancer in a high-risk population.
So JBY; Kapoor R; Zhu F; Koh C; Zhou L; Zou R; Tang YC; Goo PCK; Rha SY; Chung HC; Yoong J; Yap CT; Rao J; Chia CK; Tsao S; Shabbir A; Lee J; Lam KP; Hartman M; Yong WP; Too HP; Yeoh KG
Gut; 2021 May; 70(5):829-837. PubMed ID: 33028667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Significance of Serum p53 Antibody in the Early Detection and Poor Prognosis of Gastric Cancer.
Kunizaki M; Fukuda A; Wakata K; Tominaga T; Nonaka T; Miyazaki T; Matsumoto K; Sumida Y; Hidaka S; Yasutake T; Sawai T; Hamamoto R; Nanashima A; Nagayasu T
Anticancer Res; 2017 Apr; 37(4):1979-1984. PubMed ID: 28373470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen, alpha fetoprotein, carbohydrate antigen 125 and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms].
Chen L; Zhang Y; Chen M; Chen J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Sep; 20(9):1002-1008. PubMed ID: 28900990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical significance and prognostic value of CA72-4 compared with CEA and CA19-9 in patients with gastric cancer.
Ychou M; Duffour J; Kramar A; Gourgou S; Grenier J
Dis Markers; 2000; 16(3-4):105-10. PubMed ID: 11381189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of carcinoembryonic and carbohydrate antigens as cancer biomarkers to monitor palliative chemotherapy in advanced stage gastric cancer.
Abbas M; Ahmed A; Khan GJ; Baig MMFA; Naveed M; Mikrani R; Cao T; Naeem S; Shi M; Dingding C
Curr Probl Cancer; 2019 Feb; 43(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 30172422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.
Gao Y; Zhang K; Xi H; Cai A; Wu X; Cui J; Li J; Qiao Z; Wei B; Chen L
Oncotarget; 2017 Jan; 8(4):6330-6340. PubMed ID: 28009985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of different imaging methods in the diagnosis of breast cancer: A protocol for network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
Zhang M; Lian R; Zhang R; Hong Y; Feng W; Feng S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 May; 100(19):e25803. PubMed ID: 34106617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
