BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29743065)

  • 1. Rationing cancer treatment: a qualitative study of perceptions of legitimate limit-setting.
    Feiring E; Wang H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 May; 18(1):342. PubMed ID: 29743065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of priority setting decisions for new cancer drugs on medical oncologists' practice in Ontario: a qualitative study.
    Berry SR; Hubay S; Soibelman H; Martin DK
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Nov; 7():193. PubMed ID: 18042302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can clinical ethics committees be legitimate actors in bedside rationing?
    Magelssen M; Bærøe K
    BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):97. PubMed ID: 31856803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [High-cost medicine--do we lack open and legitimate procedures for prioritising?].
    Johansson KA; Miljeteig I; Norheim OF
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Jan; 129(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 19119291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conceptualizations of fairness and legitimacy in the context of Ethiopian health priority setting: Reflections on the applicability of accountability for reasonableness.
    Petricca K; Bekele A
    Dev World Bioeth; 2018 Dec; 18(4):357-364. PubMed ID: 28544136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antimicrobial stewardship: a qualitative study of the development of national guidelines for antibiotic use in hospitals.
    Feiring E; Walter AB
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Nov; 17(1):747. PubMed ID: 29157244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Public participation: healthcare rationing in the newspaper media.
    Brendbekken A; Robberstad B; Norheim OF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Mar; 22(1):407. PubMed ID: 35346177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decentralized health care priority-setting in Tanzania: evaluating against the accountability for reasonableness framework.
    Maluka S; Kamuzora P; San Sebastiån M; Byskov J; Olsen ØE; Shayo E; Ndawi B; Hurtig AK
    Soc Sci Med; 2010 Aug; 71(4):751-9. PubMed ID: 20554365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 'There is no such thing as getting sick justly or unjustly' - a qualitative study of clinicians' beliefs on the relevance of personal responsibility as a basis for health prioritisation.
    Traina G; Feiring E
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Jun; 20(1):497. PubMed ID: 32493300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Priority setting and cardiac surgery: a qualitative case study.
    Walton NA; Martin DK; Peter EH; Pringle DM; Singer PA
    Health Policy; 2007 Mar; 80(3):444-58. PubMed ID: 16757057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Priority setting in developing countries health care institutions: the case of a Ugandan hospital.
    Kapiriri L; Martin DK
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Oct; 6():127. PubMed ID: 17026761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strengthening fairness, transparency and accountability in health care priority setting at district level in Tanzania.
    Maluka SO
    Glob Health Action; 2011; 4():. PubMed ID: 22072991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-responsibility, rationing and treatment decision making - managing moral narratives alongside fiscal reality in the obesity surgery clinic.
    Owen-Smith A; Coast J; Donovan JL
    Health Expect; 2018 Jun; 21(3):606-614. PubMed ID: 29349856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Justice and procedure: how does "accountability for reasonableness" result in fair limit-setting decisions?
    Rid A
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jan; 35(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 19103936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. To accept, or not to accept, that is the question: citizen reactions to rationing.
    Broqvist M; Garpenby P
    Health Expect; 2014 Feb; 17(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 22032636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers.
    Martin DK; Giacomini M; Singer PA
    Health Policy; 2002 Sep; 61(3):279-90. PubMed ID: 12098521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Priority setting in kidney transplantation: a qualitative study evaluating Swedish practices.
    Omar F; Tinghög G; Carlsson P; Omnell-Persson M; Welin S
    Scand J Public Health; 2013 Mar; 41(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 23287398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advancing methods for health priority setting practice through the contribution of systems theory: Lessons from a case study in Ethiopia.
    Petricca K; Bekele A; Berta W; Gibson J; Pain C
    Soc Sci Med; 2018 Feb; 198():165-174. PubMed ID: 29367105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making?
    Kapiriri L; Norheim OF; Martin DK
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(4):766-73. PubMed ID: 19070414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What do district health planners in Tanzania think about improving priority setting using 'Accountability for reasonableness'?
    Mshana S; Shemilu H; Ndawi B; Momburi R; Olsen OE; Byskov J; Martin DK
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Nov; 7():180. PubMed ID: 17997824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.