88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29743175)
1. Genomic Model with Correlation Between Additive and Dominance Effects.
Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
Genetics; 2018 Jul; 209(3):711-723. PubMed ID: 29743175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. GVCBLUP: a computer package for genomic prediction and variance component estimation of additive and dominance effects.
Wang C; Prakapenka D; Wang S; Pulugurta S; Runesha HB; Da Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Aug; 15(1):270. PubMed ID: 25107495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating dominance genetic variances for growth traits in American Angus males using genomic models.
Garcia-Baccino CA; Lourenco DAL; Miller S; Cantet RJC; Vitezica ZG
J Anim Sci; 2020 Jan; 98(1):. PubMed ID: 31867623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of a Bayesian dominance model improves power in quantitative trait genome-wide association analysis.
Bennewitz J; Edel C; Fries R; Meuwissen TH; Wellmann R
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):7. PubMed ID: 28088170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of prior specifications in a shrinkage-inducing Bayesian model for quantitative trait mapping and genomic prediction.
Knürr T; Läärä E; Sillanpää MJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):24. PubMed ID: 23834140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. polyGBLUP: a modified genomic best linear unbiased prediction improved the genomic prediction efficiency for autopolyploid species.
Song H; Zhang Q; Hu H
Brief Bioinform; 2024 Jan; 25(2):. PubMed ID: 38517695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novel Bayesian Networks for Genomic Prediction of Developmental Traits in Biomass Sorghum.
Dos Santos JPR; Fernandes SB; McCoy S; Lozano R; Brown PJ; Leakey ADB; Buckler ES; Garcia AAF; Gore MA
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Feb; 10(2):769-781. PubMed ID: 31852730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. GbyE: an integrated tool for genome widely association study and genome selection based on genetic by environmental interaction.
Liu X; Wang M; Qin J; Liu Y; Wang S; Wu S; Zhang M; Zhong J; Wang J
BMC Genomics; 2024 Apr; 25(1):386. PubMed ID: 38641604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parametric and nonparametric statistical methods for genomic selection of traits with additive and epistatic genetic architectures.
Howard R; Carriquiry AL; Beavis WD
G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Apr; 4(6):1027-46. PubMed ID: 24727289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic Variance Partitioning and Genome-Wide Prediction with Allele Dosage Information in Autotetraploid Potato.
Endelman JB; Carley CAS; Bethke PC; Coombs JJ; Clough ME; da Silva WL; De Jong WS; Douches DS; Frederick CM; Haynes KG; Holm DG; Miller JC; Muñoz PR; Navarro FM; Novy RG; Palta JP; Porter GA; Rak KT; Sathuvalli VR; Thompson AL; Yencho GC
Genetics; 2018 May; 209(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 29514860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic-assisted prediction of genetic value with semiparametric procedures.
Gianola D; Fernando RL; Stella A
Genetics; 2006 Jul; 173(3):1761-76. PubMed ID: 16648593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An alternative covariance estimator to investigate genetic heterogeneity in populations.
Heslot N; Jannink JL
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():93. PubMed ID: 26612537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic breeding value prediction and QTL mapping of QTLMAS2011 data using Bayesian and GBLUP methods.
Zeng J; Pszczola M; Wolc A; Strabel T; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
BMC Proc; 2012 May; 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7. PubMed ID: 22640755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving multi-population genomic prediction accuracy using multi-trait GBLUP models which incorporate global or local genetic correlation information.
Teng J; Zhai T; Zhang X; Zhao C; Wang W; Tang H; Wang D; Shang Y; Ning C; Zhang Q
Brief Bioinform; 2024 May; 25(4):. PubMed ID: 38856170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A marker weighting approach for enhancing within-family accuracy in genomic prediction.
Montesinos-López OA; Crespo-Herrera L; Xavier A; Godwa M; Beyene Y; Pierre CS; de la Rosa-Santamaria R; Salinas-Ruiz J; Gerard G; Vitale P; Dreisigacker S; Lillemo M; Grignola F; Sarinelli M; Pozzo E; Quiroga M; Montesinos-López A; Crossa J
G3 (Bethesda); 2024 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 38079160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using encrypted genotypes and phenotypes for collaborative genomic analyses to maintain data confidentiality.
Zhao T; Wang F; Mott R; Dekkers J; Cheng H
Genetics; 2024 Mar; 226(3):. PubMed ID: 38085098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefits of Dominance over Additive Models for the Estimation of Average Effects in the Presence of Dominance.
Duenk P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P
G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Oct; 7(10):3405-3414. PubMed ID: 28842396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reinventing quantitative genetics for plant breeding: something old, something new, something borrowed, something BLUE.
Bernardo R
Heredity (Edinb); 2020 Dec; 125(6):375-385. PubMed ID: 32296132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative genetics of genomic imprinting: a comparison of simple variance derivations, the effects of inbreeding, and response to selection.
Santure AW; Spencer HG
G3 (Bethesda); 2011 Jul; 1(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 22384325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. BGGE: A New Package for Genomic-Enabled Prediction Incorporating Genotype × Environment Interaction Models.
Granato I; Cuevas J; Luna-Vázquez F; Crossa J; Montesinos-López O; Burgueño J; Fritsche-Neto R
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Aug; 8(9):3039-3047. PubMed ID: 30049744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
