154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29744160)
21. Abutments with reduced diameter for both cement and screw retentions: analysis of failure modes and misfit of abutment-crown-connections after cyclic loading.
Moris IC; Faria AC; Ribeiro RF; Rodrigues RC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Apr; 28(4):432-436. PubMed ID: 26923302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the residual cement on custom computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing titanium and zirconia abutments: A preliminary cohort study.
Hsu KW; Liang CH; Peng YC; Hsiao CC
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):618-624. PubMed ID: 34521506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations.
Wadhwani C; Chung KH
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of a shape memory implant abutment system: An up to 6-month pilot clinical study.
Shah KC; Linsley CS; Wu BM
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):257-263. PubMed ID: 31227233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A novel method of 3D printing locating guide for abutment screw removal in cement-retained implant-supported prostheses.
Yu J; Chen Y; Liu X; Islam R; Alam MK
J Dent Sci; 2022 Oct; 17(4):1665-1668. PubMed ID: 36299312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implants with Zirconia Crown Restorations: Conventional Cement-Retained vs. Cementless Screw-Retained.
Lee JH; Jang HY; Lee SY
Materials (Basel); 2021 May; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 34069608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fracture Resistance of Single-Unit Implant-Supported Crowns: Effects of Prosthetic Design and Restorative Material.
Donmez MB; Diken Turksayar AA; Olcay EO; Sahmali SM
J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 34383979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The distribution of marginal excess cement of implant-supported vented and non-vented zirconia crowns with and without cleaning procedures.
Wang F; Li Q; Chen L; Liu H; Chen L; Dong H
J Prosthodont; 2024 Mar; 33(3):266-272. PubMed ID: 36951153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Strain analysis of 9 different abutments for cement-retained crowns on an internal hexagonal implant.
Salaita LG; Yilmaz B; Seidt JD; Clelland NL; Chien HH; McGlumphy EA
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Aug; 118(2):166-171. PubMed ID: 28126354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of venting and seating techniques on the cementation of complete coverage restorations.
Cruz MA; Sorenson JA; Johnson WK
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 19051863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The cross-pin retained implant supported restoration: a study of gasket placement and leakage.
Sambrook RJ; Judge RB
Aust Dent J; 2012 Dec; 57(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 23186564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mechanical integrity of cement- and screw-retained zirconium-lithium silicate glass-ceramic crowns to Morse taper implants.
Vahey BR; Sordi MB; Stanley K; Magini RS; Novaes de Oliveira AP; Fredel MC; Henriques B; Souza JCM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):721-731. PubMed ID: 30093122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of abutment modification and cement type on retention of cement-retained implant supported crowns.
Farzin M; Torabi K; Ahangari AH; Derafshi R
J Dent (Tehran); 2014 May; 11(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 25628660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prospective assessment of CAD/CAM zirconia abutment and lithium disilicate crown restorations: 2.4 year results.
Cooper LF; Stanford C; Feine J; McGuire M
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jul; 116(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 26831919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of abutment neck taper and cement types on the amount of remnant cement in cement-retained implant restorations: an
Park YH; Kim KA; Lee JJ; Kwon TM; Seo JM
J Adv Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 14(3):162-172. PubMed ID: 35855317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Effect of Cement and Screw on the Resistance of an Implant Crown Telescopically Engaged to a Hexagonal Shaped Abutment Under Compressive Dynamic Cyclic Fatigue Loading.
Kwan JC; Kwan N
Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 0(0):. PubMed ID: 37824120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The influence of the cementation margin position on the amount of undetected cement. A prospective clinical study.
Linkevicius T; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L; Maslova N; Puriene A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jan; 24(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 22487018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The ability to screw-retain single implant-supported restorations in the anterior maxilla: A CBCT analysis.
Edmondson EK; Trejo PM; Soldatos N; Weltman RL
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):443-449. PubMed ID: 33610330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
