154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29744160)
41. Effect of Restoration Design on the Removal Torque Loss of Implant-supported Crowns after Cyclic Loading.
Jongsiri S; Arksornnukit M; Homsiang W; Kamonkhantikul K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Dec; 24(12):951-956. PubMed ID: 38317392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Influence of collar height of definitive restoration and type of luting cement on the amount of residual cement in implant restorations: A clinical study.
Ayyadanveettil P; Thavakkara V; Koodakkadavath S; Thavakkal A
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):109-115. PubMed ID: 34116840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Influence of abutment height and convergence angle on the retrievability of cement-retained implant prostheses with a lingual slot.
Choi KH; Son K; Lee DH; Lee KB
J Adv Prosthodont; 2018 Oct; 10(5):381-387. PubMed ID: 30370030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The effect of venting on pulpward pressure transmission and seating on crown cementation: a laboratory study.
Yuen TW; Wilson PR
J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Nov; 27(11):958-66. PubMed ID: 11106987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants.
Hanes B; Feitosa S; Phasuk K; Levon JA; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):441-446. PubMed ID: 34632673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. In Vitro Examination of the Use of Er:YAG Laser to Retrieve Lithium Disilicate Crowns from Titanium Implant Abutments.
Grzech-Leśniak K; Bencharit S; Dalal N; Mroczka K; Deeb JG
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jul; 28(6):672-676. PubMed ID: 31125150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparing effectiveness of rubber dam and gingival displacement cord with copy abutment in reducing residual cement in cement-retained implant crowns: A crossover RCT.
Andrijauskas P; Zukauskas S; Alkimavicius J; Peciuliene V; Linkevicius T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 May; 32(5):549-558. PubMed ID: 33595848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants.
Sheets JL; Wilcox C; Wilwerding T
J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 17971122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Cement-associated peri-implantitis: a retrospective clinical observational study of fixed implant-supported restorations using a methacrylate cement.
Korsch M; Obst U; Walther W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):797-802. PubMed ID: 23600620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effects of crown retrieval on implants and the surrounding bone: a finite element analysis.
Ozkir SE; Unal SM; Yurekli E; Güven S
J Adv Prosthodont; 2016 Apr; 8(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 27141257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Evaluation of the success rate of cone beam computed tomography in determining the location and direction of screw access holes in cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: An in vitro study.
Neshandar Asli H; Dalili Kajan Z; Gholizade F
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):220-224. PubMed ID: 29475756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface.
Hjerppe J; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104121. PubMed ID: 35395344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns.
Covey DA; Kent DK; St Germain HA; Koka S
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 10709044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. An esthetic solution to the screw-retained implant restoration: introduction to the implant crown adhesive plug: clinical report.
Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Avots J
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 21649826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Implant-abutment fit influences the mechanical performance of single-crown prostheses.
Ramalho IS; Bergamo ETP; Witek L; Coelho PG; Lopes ACO; Bonfante EA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Feb; 102():103506. PubMed ID: 31877515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effect of abutment finish lines on the mechanical behavior and marginal fit of screw-retained implant crowns: An in vitro study.
García-González M; González-González I; García-García I; Blasón-González S; Lamela-Rey MJ; Fernández-Canteli A; Álvarez-Arenal Á
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Feb; 127(2):318.e1-318.e10. PubMed ID: 34657727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Additively manufactured implant abutment screw-access guide to remove a cement-retained implant crown: A technique.
Revilla-León M; Abaei DS; Tittle A; Zandinejad A
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Feb; 127(2):219-222. PubMed ID: 33423818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections.
Piattelli A; Scarano A; Paolantonio M; Assenza B; Leghissa GC; Di Bonaventura G; Catamo G; Piccolomini R
J Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 72(9):1146-50. PubMed ID: 11577944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Compressive and tensile zones in the cement interface of full crowns: a technical note on the concept of resistance.
Wiskott HW; Krebs C; Scherrer SS; Botsis J; Belser UC
J Prosthodont; 1999 Jun; 8(2):80-91. PubMed ID: 10740506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Biomechanical evaluation of screw- and cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
Silva GC; Cornacchia TM; de Magalhães CS; Bueno AC; Moreira AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1479-88. PubMed ID: 25062583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]