BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29744160)

  • 61. Peri-implant soft-tissue health surrounding cement- and screw-retained implant restorations: a multi-center, 3-year prospective study.
    Weber HP; Kim DM; Ng MW; Hwang JW; Fiorellini JP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Aug; 17(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 16907767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Influence of lubricant on screw preload and stresses in a finite element model for a dental implant.
    Jörn D; Kohorst P; Besdo S; Rücker M; Stiesch M; Borchers L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):340-8. PubMed ID: 24529658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Experimental study on the influence of various dental luting cements on the crown elevation during cementation].
    Satoh K
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1989 Aug; 89(8):1317-37. PubMed ID: 2641195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Acrylic resin guide for locating the abutment screw access channel of cement-retained implant prostheses.
    Ahmed A; Maroulakos G; Garaicoa J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 May; 115(5):560-3. PubMed ID: 26794698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The peri-implant sulcus compared with internal implant and suprastructure components: a microbiological analysis.
    Cosyn J; Van Aelst L; Collaert B; Persson GR; De Bruyn H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):286-95. PubMed ID: 19673920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A screwless and cementless technique for the restoration of single-tooth implants: a retrospective cohort study.
    Urdaneta RA; Marincola M; Weed M; Chuang SK
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):562-71. PubMed ID: 18761575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Cemented CeraOne and porcelain fused to TiAdapt abutment single-implant crown restorations: a 10-year comparative follow-up study.
    Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 18783414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.
    Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Rocha EP; Silva NR; Marotta L; Coelho PG
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 119(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21726295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Excess cement and the risk of peri-implant disease - a systematic review.
    Staubli N; Walter C; Schmidt JC; Weiger R; Zitzmann NU
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Oct; 28(10):1278-1290. PubMed ID: 27647536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Predictors of excess cement and tissue response to fixed implant-supported dentures after cementation.
    Korsch M; Robra BP; Walther W
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 17 Suppl 1():e45-53. PubMed ID: 23879821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. New abutment for a screw-retained, implant-supported crown.
    Prisco R; Morgano SM; D'amato S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 11174675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Influence of cement film thickness on the retention of implant-retained crowns.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Steiner M; Vollrath O; Kern M
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Dec; 22(8):618-25. PubMed ID: 23915027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Technique for cementing screwmentable implant crowns to prevent misalignment.
    Ryser AS; Kim K; Sabol JV; Handel S
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38279677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Microstructure of titanium-cement-lithium disilicate interface in CAD-CAM dental implant crowns: a three-dimensional profilometric analysis.
    Cresti S; Itri A; Rebaudi A; Diaspro A; Salerno M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 17 Suppl 1():e97-e106. PubMed ID: 23968260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Zirconia abutments for single-tooth implant restorations: a retrospective and clinical follow-up study.
    Ekfeldt A; Fürst B; Carlsson GE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1308-14. PubMed ID: 21382085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. To vent or not to vent?
    Wilson PR
    Aust Prosthodont J; 1992; 6():47-52. PubMed ID: 1300133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Finite element analysis of ceramic abutment-restoration combinations for osseointegrated implants.
    Papavasiliou G; Tripodakis AP; Kamposiora P; Strub JR; Bayne SC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 8957860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The distribution of marginal excess cement of implant-supported vented and non-vented zirconia crowns with and without cleaning procedures.
    Wang F; Li Q; Chen L; Liu H; Chen L; Dong H
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Mar; 33(3):266-272. PubMed ID: 36951153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Influence of implant abutment angulations on the fracture resistance of overlaying CAM-milled zirconia single crowns.
    Ellakwa A; Raj T; Deeb S; Ronaghi G; Martin FE; Klineberg I
    Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 21623803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.