155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29744160)
81. The effects of crown venting or pre-cementing of CAD/CAM-constructed all-ceramic crowns luted on YTZ implants on marginal cement excess.
Zaugg LK; Zehnder I; Rohr N; Fischer J; Zitzmann NU
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 29044723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. A clinical study of the efficacy of gold-tite square abutment screws in cement-retained implant restorations.
Drago CJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 12705307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Accuracy of a CAD/CAM-guided template for locating abutment screws for cement-retained implant-supported restorations.
Lee DH; Mai HN; Li LJ; Lee KW
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jul; 116(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 26868962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Three-dimensional location of the retaining screw axis for a cemented single tooth implant restoration.
Wicks R; Shintaku WH; Johnson A
J Prosthodont; 2012 Aug; 21(6):491-3. PubMed ID: 22823426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. A bioactive dental luting cement--its retentive properties and 3-year clinical findings.
Jefferies SR; Pameijer CH; Appleby DC; Boston D; Lööf J
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Feb; 34 Spec No 1():2-9. PubMed ID: 23577551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Effect of seating force, margin design, and cement on marginal seal and retention of complete metal crowns.
Piemjai M
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):412-6. PubMed ID: 12066634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
Mansour A; Ercoli C; Graser G; Tallents R; Moss M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Using a porcelain furnace to debond cement-retained implant crown from the abutment after screw fracture: a clinical report.
Saponaro PC; Heshmati RH; Lee DJ
J Prosthodont; 2015 Apr; 24(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 25316610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Interim restoration using dynamic abutments to re-treat a single-implant crown with a labial angulation: A clinical report.
Gómez-Polo M; Gómez-Polo C; Celemín A; Ortega R
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):791-795. PubMed ID: 29807738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Clinical Factors Influencing Removal of the Cement Excess in Implant-Supported Restorations.
Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Maslova N; Linkeviciene L; Peciuliene V; Linkevicius T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 17(4):771-8. PubMed ID: 24224895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. A comparison of the porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained and cement-retained implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns.
Torrado E; Ercoli C; Al Mardini M; Graser GN; Tallents RH; Cordaro L
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 15211294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Should the vent hole of posterior implant crowns be placed on the lateral surface? An in vitro study of the hydrodynamic feature of cement extrusion and retention ability.
Ye S; Zhou H; Lyu X; Feng H; Liu M; Wen C
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0276198. PubMed ID: 36264869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Effects of the Screw-Access Hole Diameter on the Biomechanical Behaviors of 4 Types of Cement-Retained Implant Prosthodontic Systems and Their Surrounding Cortical Bones: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Du L; Li Z; Chang X; Rahhal O; Qin B; Wen X; Zhou D
Implant Dent; 2018 Oct; 27(5):555-563. PubMed ID: 30134266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Influence of occlusal forces on stress distribution in preloaded dental implant screws.
Alkan I; Sertgöz A; Ekici B
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 15116032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Torque loss of different abutment sizes before and after cyclic loading.
Moris IC; Faria AC; Ribeiro RF; Rodrigues RC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1256-61. PubMed ID: 26574850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Effects of tightening torque on screw stress and formation of implant-abutment microgaps: A finite element analysis.
Honório Tonin BS; He Y; Ye N; Chew HP; Fok A
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):882-889. PubMed ID: 33472752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Stress distribution and microgap formation in angulated zirconia abutments with a titanium base in narrow diameter implants: A 3D finite element analysis.
Zhang Y; Yu P; Yu H
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2022 Jul; 38(7):e3610. PubMed ID: 35490303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. A Newly Designed Screw- and Cement-Retained Prosthesis and Its Abutments.
Heo YK; Lim YJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(6):612-4. PubMed ID: 26523721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
