These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29744245)

  • 21. Stroke Volume and Arterial Pressure Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Elevated Stroke Volume Variation Undergoing Major Vascular Surgery: A Prospective Intervention Study.
    Fischer A; Menger J; Mouhieddine M; Seidel M; Edlinger-Stanger M; Bevilacqua M; Brugger J; Hiesmayr M; Dworschak M
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2023 Mar; 37(3):407-414. PubMed ID: 36529634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The value of passive leg raising test in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction].
    Xiang S; Muyun H; Juan C; Bin O; Minying C; Changjie C; Jianfeng W; Zimeng L; Yongjun L; Shunwei H; Lifen L; Xiangdong G
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Sep; 27(9):729-34. PubMed ID: 26955698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A systematic review of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac and thoracic surgery.
    Piccioni F; Bernasconi F; Tramontano GTA; Langer M
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):677-684. PubMed ID: 27306799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.
    Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predicting stroke volume and arterial pressure fluid responsiveness in liver cirrhosis patients using dynamic preload variables: A prospective study of diagnostic accuracy.
    Wu CY; Cheng YJ; Liu YJ; Wu TT; Chien CT; Chan KC;
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2016 Sep; 33(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 27167058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tidal volume challenge to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room: An observational study.
    Messina A; Montagnini C; Cammarota G; De Rosa S; Giuliani F; Muratore L; Della Corte F; Navalesi P; Cecconi M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 36(8):583-591. PubMed ID: 31021879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of tidal volume on pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during experimental intra-abdominal hypertension.
    Díaz F; Erranz B; Donoso A; Salomon T; Cruces P
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 Sep; 15():127. PubMed ID: 26395001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prediction of fluid responsiveness by a continuous non-invasive assessment of arterial pressure in critically ill patients: comparison with four other dynamic indices.
    Monnet X; Dres M; Ferré A; Le Teuff G; Jozwiak M; Bleibtreu A; Le Deley MC; Chemla D; Richard C; Teboul JL
    Br J Anaesth; 2012 Sep; 109(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 22735299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation.
    Jun IJ; Chung MH; Kim JE; Lee HS; Son JM; Choi EM
    Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(12):2589-2598. PubMed ID: 34104090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing protective one-lung ventilation.
    Fu Q; Duan M; Zhao F; Mi W
    Drug Discov Ther; 2015 Aug; 9(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 26370528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
    de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of VTILVOT variation rate on the assessment of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients.
    Wang J; Zhou D; Gao Y; Wu Z; Wang X; Lv C
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Nov; 99(47):e22702. PubMed ID: 33217793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dynamic changes of pulse pressure but not of pulse pressure variation during passive leg raising predict preload responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneous breathing activity.
    Shi R; Moretto F; Prat D; Jacobs F; Teboul JL; Hamzaoui O
    J Crit Care; 2022 Dec; 72():154141. PubMed ID: 36116288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Predictive values of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation for fluid responsiveness in patients with pneumoperitoneum.
    Zlicar M; Novak-Jankovic V; Blagus R; Cecconi M
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Oct; 32(5):825-832. PubMed ID: 29149433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dynamic preload markers to predict fluid responsiveness during and after major gastrointestinal surgery: an observational substudy of the OPTIMISE trial.
    MacDonald N; Ahmad T; Mohr O; Kirk-Bayley J; Moppett I; Hinds CJ; Pearse RM
    Br J Anaesth; 2015 Apr; 114(4):598-604. PubMed ID: 25500941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of Noninvasive Dynamic Indices of Fluid Responsiveness Among Different Ventilation Modes in Dogs Recovering from Experimental Cardiac Surgery.
    Sasaki K; Mutoh T; Yamamoto S; Taki Y; Kawashima R
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 Oct; 24():7736-7741. PubMed ID: 30372425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness in Prone Neurosurgical Patients Undergoing Protective Ventilation: Role of Dynamic Indices, Tidal Volume Challenge, and End-Expiratory Occlusion Test.
    Messina A; Montagnini C; Cammarota G; Giuliani F; Muratore L; Baggiani M; Bennett V; Della Corte F; Navalesi P; Cecconi M
    Anesth Analg; 2020 Mar; 130(3):752-761. PubMed ID: 31651455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [End-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure to assess the value of passive leg-raising test in predicting volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
    Liu Y; Tang W; Xiao D
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2022 Feb; 34(2):133-137. PubMed ID: 35387717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison Between Changes in Systolic-Pressure Variation and Pulse-Pressure Variation After Passive Leg Raising to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Postoperative Critically Ill Patients.
    Xie J; Xu L; Peng K; Chen J; Wan J
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2024 Feb; 38(2):459-465. PubMed ID: 38114373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators.
    Preisman S; Kogan S; Berkenstadt H; Perel A
    Br J Anaesth; 2005 Dec; 95(6):746-55. PubMed ID: 16286349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.