171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29744724)
1. Comparative evaluation of three obturation techniques in primary incisors using digital intra-oral receptor and C.B.C.T-an in vitro study.
Akhil JEJ; Prashant B; Shashibushan KK
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb; 23(2):689-696. PubMed ID: 29744724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Different Root Canal Obturation Methods in Primary Teeth Using Cone Beam Computerized Tomography.
Singh R; Chaudhary S; Manuja N; Chaitra TR; Sinha AA
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(5):462-9. PubMed ID: 26551371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparative Analysis of Voids and Sealing Ability of Different Obturating Techniques Using CBCT.
Singh A; Anand S; Prakash R; Ahmed A; Dhawan J
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Oct; 23(10):1021-1025. PubMed ID: 37073916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of different obturation techniques for primary molars by digital radiography.
Memarpour M; Shahidi S; Meshki R
Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 23756307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Volumetric evaluation of various obturation techniques in primary teeth using cone beam computed tomography - An
Nagaveni NB; Yadav S; Poornima P; Bharath KP; Mathew MG; Naveen Kumar PG
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(3):244-248. PubMed ID: 28762351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Comparative Volumetric Evaluation of Four Obturating Techniques in Primary Teeth Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Singh A; Gupta N; Agarwal N; Kumar D; Anand A
Pediatr Dent; 2017 Mar; 39(2):11-16. PubMed ID: 28390451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Volumetric Evaluation of Different Obturation Techniques in Primary Teeth Using Spiral Computed Tomography.
Nagaveni NB; Yadav S; Poornima P; Reddy VS; Roshan NM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 28052215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative Evaluation of Three Obturating Techniques in Primary Molars: An
Ellana Jermiah J; Rao A; Srikant N; Rao A; Suprabha BS
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 43(6):372-375. PubMed ID: 31657988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Root canal obturation materials and filling techniques for primary teeth: In vitro evaluation in polymer-based prototyped incisors.
Aragão AC; Pintor AVB; Marceliano-Alves M; Primo LG; Silva ASS; Lopes RT; Neves AA
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2020 May; 30(3):381-389. PubMed ID: 31811738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Obturation Techniques in Deciduous Teeth Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography: An
Nezam S; Mukherjee CG; Shukla JN; Jha A; Khan SA; Tanwar AS
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021; 14(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 34326588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of endodontic pressure syringe, insulin syringe, jiffy tube, and local anesthetic syringe in obturation of primary teeth: An in vitro study.
Hiremath MC; Srivastava P
J Nat Sci Biol Med; 2016; 7(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 27433062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital Radiographic Evaluation of the Quality of Different Root Canal Obturation Techniques in Deciduous Mandibular Molars after Preparation with Rotary Technique.
Jafarzadeh M; Saatchi M; Jafarnejadi P; Gooran M
J Dent (Shiraz); 2019 Sep; 20(3):152-158. PubMed ID: 31579688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro comparison of three delivery techniques for obturation of root canals in primary molars.
Walia T; Ghanbari AH; Mathew S; Ziadlou AH
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2017 Feb; 18(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 27885586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative volumetric analysis of three different obturating materials in primary molars under cone beam computed tomography: an in-vitro study.
Pandey A; K P; Avinash A; Pathivada L; Kumar B; Kapur D
Minerva Dent Oral Sci; 2023 Feb; 72(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 36197278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pulpectomies in primary incisors using three delivery systems: an in vitro study.
Guelmann M; McEachern M; Turner C
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2004; 28(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 15366621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Evaluation of Obturating Techniques in Primary Teeth: An in vivo Study.
Vashista K; Sandhu M; Sachdev V
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 8(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 26628851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative assessment of different techniques for obturation with endoflas in primary molars: An
Pandranki J; Chitturi RR; Vanga NR; Chandrabhatla SK
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(1):44-48. PubMed ID: 28393816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary Molar Pulpectomy Using Two Different Obturation Techniques: A Clinical Study.
Nagarathna C; Vishwanathan S; Krishnamurthy NH; Bhat PK
Contemp Clin Dent; 2018; 9(2):231-236. PubMed ID: 29875566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical efficacy of various root canal obturating methods in primary teeth: a comparative study.
Grover R; Mehra M; Pandit IK; Srivastava N; Gugnani N; Gupta M
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jun; 14(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 23758458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of Root Canal Obturation Quality in Deciduous Molars with Different Obturation Materials: An
Orhan AI; Tatli EC
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():6567161. PubMed ID: 34307660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
