These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29744967)

  • 1. Measuring digit lengths with 3D digital stereophotogrammetry: A comparison across methods.
    Gremba A; Weinberg SM
    Am J Hum Biol; 2018 Jul; 30(4):e23133. PubMed ID: 29744967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and reliability of 3D stereophotogrammetry: A comparison to direct anthropometry and 2D photogrammetry.
    Dindaroğlu F; Kutlu P; Duran GS; Görgülü S; Aslan E
    Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 26267357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of Periocular Anthropometry: A Comparison of Direct, 2-Dimensional, and 3-Dimensional Techniques.
    Guo Y; Hou X; Rokohl AC; Jia R; Heindl LM
    Dermatol Surg; 2020 Sep; 46(9):e23-e31. PubMed ID: 31809350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Facial Anthropometry Using Three-Dimensional Photogrammetry and Direct Measuring Techniques.
    Düppe K; Becker M; Schönmeyr B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 29(5):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 29608484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the Genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
    Weinberg SM; Naidoo S; Govier DP; Martin RA; Kane AA; Marazita ML
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 May; 17(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 16770184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In a clinimetric analysis, 3D stereophotogrammetry was found to be reliable and valid for measuring scar volume in clinical research.
    Stekelenburg CM; Jaspers ME; Niessen FB; Knol DL; van der Wal MB; de Vet HC; van Zuijlen PP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):782-7. PubMed ID: 25817943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Photocopies yield lower digit ratios (2D:4D) than direct finger measurements.
    Manning JT; Fink B; Neave N; Caswell N
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Jun; 34(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 15971015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of periocular anthropometry using three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry.
    Guo Y; Rokohl AC; Schaub F; Hou X; Liu J; Ruan Y; Jia R; Koch KR; Heindl LM
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 257(11):2517-2531. PubMed ID: 31407036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protocol Establishment and Reliability Verification of Three-Dimensional Digital Stereophotogrammetry in Lower Eyelid Anthropometry.
    Chi Y; Yang Y; Jin L; Chong Y; Huang J; Yu N; Long X
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2024 Apr; 48(7):1276-1287. PubMed ID: 37792022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study of digit ratios (2D:4D and other) and novel measures of relative finger length: testing magnitude and consistency of sex differences across samples.
    Voracek M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Feb; 108(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 19425449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraobserver error associated with measurements of the hand.
    Weinberg SM; Scott NM; Neiswanger K; Marazita ML
    Am J Hum Biol; 2005; 17(3):368-71. PubMed ID: 15849702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digit ratios (2D:4D) determined by computer-assisted analysis are more reliable than those using physical measurements, photocopies, and printed scans.
    Allaway HC; Bloski TG; Pierson RA; Lujan ME
    Am J Hum Biol; 2009; 21(3):365-70. PubMed ID: 19263413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anthropometric Study of Three-Dimensional Facial Morphology in Malay Adults.
    Othman SA; Majawit LP; Wan Hassan WN; Wey MC; Mohd Razi R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164180. PubMed ID: 27706220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry: Comparison of the 3dMD and Bellus3D facial scanning systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
    Liu J; Zhang C; Cai R; Yao Y; Zhao Z; Liao W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Dec; 160(6):862-871. PubMed ID: 34814981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
    Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human 2D (index) and 4D (ring) digit lengths: their variation and relationships during the menstrual cycle.
    Mayhew TM; Gillam L; McDonald R; Ebling FJ
    J Anat; 2007 Nov; 211(5):630-8. PubMed ID: 17764524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Picture perfect? Reliability of craniofacial anthropometry using three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry.
    Heike CL; Cunningham ML; Hing AV; Stuhaug E; Starr JR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Oct; 124(4):1261-1272. PubMed ID: 19935311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Perioral Evaluation Method Using Three-Dimensional Stereophotogrammetry.
    Yang Y; Chi Y; Jin L; Chong Y; Long X; Zeng A; Yu N; Wang X
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Dec; 47(6):2389-2400. PubMed ID: 37430012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digit ratios (2D:4D and other) and relative thumb length: a test of developmental stability.
    Voracek M; Offenmüller D
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Aug; 105(1):143-52. PubMed ID: 17918557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system.
    Weinberg SM; Scott NM; Neiswanger K; Brandon CA; Marazita ML
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Sep; 41(5):507-18. PubMed ID: 15352857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.